• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科姑息治疗中终末期患儿的尊严:家长和医护人员的观点。

The dignity of terminally ill children in pediatric palliative care: perspectives of parents and healthcare providers.

机构信息

Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based Medicine, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China.

School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, 10 Xitoutiao, Youanmen Wai, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, China.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jul 5;22(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01206-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-023-01206-4
PMID:37407969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10320906/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Chochinov Dignity Model was developed based on a cohort of adult patients with advanced cancer, but its role among dying children is not clear. This study aims to develop a model of dignity for children receiving pediatric palliative care based on the Chochinov Dignity Model.

METHODS

This is a descriptive qualitative study. Participants included a total of 11 parents and 14 healthcare providers who were recruited from a tertiary children's hospital in Beijing and the Pediatric Palliative Care Subspecialty Group of the Pediatrics Society of the Chinese Medical Association using purposive sampling. Thematic framework analysis was used to analyze data.

RESULTS

The themes of the empirical Dignity Model were broadly supported in this study, but some themes were interpreted differently in the child population. Compared with the original model, some child-specific themes were identified including acknowledging regret, a sense of security, the company of important loved ones, realizing unfinished wishes, decent and dignified death, resolving family disputes, and fairness.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study on Dignity Model for terminal children. Knowledge of children's dignity can promote reflection of healthcare providers and caregivers regarding the values underlying their performance in pediatric palliative care, and develop certain practical interventions to strengthen children and their families' sense of dignity at end of life.

摘要

背景

Chochinov 尊严模型是基于一组晚期癌症成年患者开发的,但它在临终儿童中的作用尚不清楚。本研究旨在基于 Chochinov 尊严模型为接受儿科姑息治疗的儿童开发尊严模型。

方法

这是一项描述性的定性研究。参与者包括总共 11 名父母和 14 名医疗保健提供者,他们是通过目的抽样从北京的一家三级儿童医院和中华医学会儿科学会儿科姑息治疗专业组招募的。采用主题框架分析法对数据进行分析。

结果

本研究广泛支持尊严模型的实证主题,但在儿童群体中对某些主题的解释有所不同。与原始模型相比,确定了一些特定于儿童的主题,包括承认遗憾、安全感、重要亲人的陪伴、实现未完成的愿望、体面而有尊严的死亡、解决家庭纠纷和公平。

结论

这是首个关于终末期儿童尊严模型的研究。对儿童尊严的认识可以促进医疗保健提供者和护理人员反思他们在儿科姑息治疗中表现背后的价值观,并制定某些切实可行的干预措施,以加强儿童及其家庭在生命末期的尊严感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8506/10320906/6cda8a6e354c/12904_2023_1206_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8506/10320906/6cda8a6e354c/12904_2023_1206_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8506/10320906/6cda8a6e354c/12904_2023_1206_Figa_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The dignity of terminally ill children in pediatric palliative care: perspectives of parents and healthcare providers.儿科姑息治疗中终末期患儿的尊严:家长和医护人员的观点。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jul 5;22(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01206-4.
2
[Dignity in the care of terminal ill and dying patients. Definitions and supportive interventions in palliative care].[临终关怀与濒死患者的尊严。姑息治疗中的定义与支持性干预措施]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2006 Nov;49(11):1087-96. doi: 10.1007/s00103-006-0069-6.
3
Development and evaluation of the Dignity Talk question framework for palliative patients and their families: A mixed-methods study.尊严谈话问题框架的开发和评估:一项针对姑息治疗患者及其家属的混合方法研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):195-205. doi: 10.1177/0269216317734696. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
4
Healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医疗保健使用者就患有危及生命疾病的儿童与医疗保健专业人员沟通的经历:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):33-42. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2413.
5
Living and dying with dignity in Chinese society: perspectives of older palliative care patients in Hong Kong.在中国人的社会中尊严地生活和死亡:香港老年姑息治疗患者的观点。
Age Ageing. 2013 Jul;42(4):455-61. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft003. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
6
Characterization, conservation and loss of dignity at the end-of- life in the emergency department. A qualitative protocol.在急诊科临终关怀中对尊严的特征、保护和丧失的研究。一个定性研究方案。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Jun;74(6):1392-1401. doi: 10.1111/jan.13536. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
7
Exploring the meaning of dignity at end of life for Chinese Canadians caregivers: A qualitative cross-cultural study.探索加拿大华裔临终关怀照顾者尊严的意义:一项定性的跨文化研究。
Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;35(1):142-150. doi: 10.1177/0269216320956809. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
8
Dignity at the end of life in traditional Chinese culture: Perspectives of advanced cancer patients and family members.传统中国文化中的生命末期尊严:晚期癌症患者和家属的观点。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Oct;54:102017. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102017. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
9
The Health Care Providers' Perspectives on End-of-Life Patients' Sense of Dignity. A Comparison Among Four Different Professionals' Categories.卫生保健提供者对临终患者尊严感的看法。四个不同专业类别之间的比较。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Dec;35(6):1184-1192. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01577-4.
10
Relationship between symptom burden, distress, and sense of dignity in terminally ill cancer patients.晚期癌症患者的症状负担、痛苦与尊严感之间的关系。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Sep;48(3):313-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.10.022. Epub 2014 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
End of life care in paediatric settings: UK national survey.儿科环境中的临终关怀:英国全国性调查。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2025 Feb 26;15(2):221-230. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004673.
2
Language to Support Dignity for Children With Advanced Cancer and Their Families.支持晚期癌症儿童及其家庭尊严的语言。
Pediatrics. 2024 Aug 1;154(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-065559.
3
Differences in the knowledge, attitudes, and needs of caregivers and healthcare providers regarding palliative care: a cross-sectional investigation in pediatric settings in China.

本文引用的文献

1
International Standards for Pediatric Palliative Care: From IMPaCCT to GO-PPaCS.《儿科姑息治疗国际标准:从IMPaCCT到GO-PPaCS》
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 May;63(5):e529-e543. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.031. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
2
Dignity Therapy in Pediatrics: A Case Series.儿科尊严疗法:病例系列
Palliat Med Rep. 2020 Aug 6;1(1):156-160. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2020.0015. eCollection 2020.
3
Towards advance care planning in pediatrics: a qualitative study on envisioning the future as parents of a seriously ill child.
中国儿科环境中照顾者与医疗服务提供者在姑息治疗方面的知识、态度及需求差异:一项横断面调查
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 6;23(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02052-2.
4
It's about living a normal life: parents' quality of life when their child has a life-threatening or life-limiting condition - a qualitative study.这是关于过正常生活的问题:当孩子患有危及生命或生命有限的疾病时,父母的生活质量——一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Apr 9;23(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01417-3.
迈向儿科的预立医疗照护计划:一项关于作为重症患儿父母对未来设想的定性研究
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Sep;179(9):1461-1468. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03627-2. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
4
Spiritual needs and communicating about death in nonreligious theistic families in pediatric palliative care: A qualitative study.儿科姑息治疗中非宗教有神论家庭的精神需求和死亡沟通:一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2020 Apr;34(4):533-540. doi: 10.1177/0269216319896747. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
5
Adapting the Portuguese dignity question framework for adolescents: ages 10-18.适应 10-18 岁青少年的葡萄牙尊严问题框架。
Palliat Support Care. 2020 Apr;18(2):199-205. doi: 10.1017/S1478951519000798.
6
Shared decision-making across the specialties: Much potential but many challenges.跨专业的共同决策:潜力巨大,但挑战不少。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1050-1054. doi: 10.1111/jep.13276. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
7
Dignity in life and care: the perspectives of Swedish patients in a palliative care context.生命与照护中的尊严:瑞典姑息治疗背景下患者的观点
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2019 Apr 2;25(4):193-201. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2019.25.4.193.
8
The History and the Future of the Psychology of Filial Piety: Chinese Norms to Contextualized Personality Construct.孝道心理学的历史与未来:从中国规范到情境化人格建构
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 30;10:100. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00100. eCollection 2019.
9
Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review.儿科共享决策的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2019 Jan 18;14(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0851-5.
10
"Will You Remember Me?": Talking with Adolescents About Death and Dying.《你会记得我吗?》:与青少年谈论死亡
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2018 Oct;27(4):511-526. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 Jul 31.