• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用生态有效性模型对英国循证问题解决干预措施进行文化调适,以支持有自杀行为风险的波兰囚犯:一项横断面调查。

Cultural adaptation of a UK evidence-based problem-solving intervention to support Polish prisoners at risk of suicidal behaviour: a cross-sectional survey using an Ecological Validity Model.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK

The Academy of Justice, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 9;13(7):e069252. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069252.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069252
PMID:37423634
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10335472/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To complete a cultural adaptation of a UK evidence-based problem-solving intervention to support Polish prisoners at risk of suicidal behaviour.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey participatory design using an Ecological Validity Model.

SETTING

The study was a collaboration between: the Academy of Justice, in Warsaw, the University of Lodz, two Polish prisons (ZK Raciborz and ZK Klodzko) and the University of York (UK).

METHODS

The adaptation process included an examination of the use of language, metaphors and content (ie, culturally appropriate and syntonic language), the changing of case study scenarios (relevance and acceptability) and maintenance of the theoretical underpinning of the problem-solving model (intervention comprehensibility and completeness). Four stages used: (1) a targeted demonstration for Polish prison staff, (2) a wider audit of the skills with Polish prison staff and students, (3) forward and back-translation of the adapted package, and (4) two iterative consultations with participants from stages (1) and (2) and prison officers from two Polish prisons.

PARTICIPANTS

Self-selecting volunteer participants included: targeted prison staff (n=10), prison staff from the wider Polish penitentiary system (n=39), students from the University of Lodz (n=28) and prison officers from two Polish prisons (n=12).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Acceptability and feasibility of the training package, reported in a series of knowledge user surveys.

RESULTS

The recognised benefits of using the skills within the training package included: enhancing communication, reflective development, collaborative working, changing behaviour, empowering decision-making, relevance to crisis management situations and use of open-ended questions. The skills were endorsed to be used as part of future penitentiary training for prison officers in Poland.

CONCLUSIONS

The skills had widespread appeal for use across the Polish penitentiary system. The materials were deemed relevant while adhering to the comprehensibility of the intervention. Further evaluation of the intervention should be explored using a randomised controlled trial design.

摘要

目的

完成一项针对英国循证问题解决干预措施的文化适应性调整,以支持有自杀行为风险的波兰囚犯。

设计

使用生态有效性模型的横断面调查参与式设计。

地点

该研究是在以下机构之间的合作:华沙司法学院、罗兹大学、两所波兰监狱(ZK Raciborz 和 ZK Klodzko)和约克大学(英国)。

方法

适应过程包括检查语言、隐喻和内容(即,文化上适当和协调的语言)、改变案例研究场景(相关性和可接受性)以及维护问题解决模型的理论基础(干预可理解性和完整性)。使用了四个阶段:(1)为波兰监狱工作人员进行有针对性的演示,(2)对波兰监狱工作人员和学生的技能进行更广泛的审核,(3)对适应后的方案进行前后翻译,以及(4)与来自阶段(1)和(2)的参与者以及来自两所波兰监狱的监狱官员进行两次迭代协商。

参与者

自我选择的志愿者参与者包括:目标监狱工作人员(n=10)、更广泛的波兰监狱系统的监狱工作人员(n=39)、罗兹大学的学生(n=28)和两所波兰监狱的监狱官员(n=12)。

主要结果和措施

培训包的可接受性和可行性,在一系列知识用户调查中报告。

结果

使用培训包中的技能的公认好处包括:增强沟通、反思性发展、协作工作、改变行为、增强决策能力、与危机管理情况相关以及使用开放式问题。这些技能被认可为波兰监狱官员未来监狱培训的一部分。

结论

这些技能在波兰监狱系统中得到了广泛的应用。这些材料被认为是相关的,同时坚持干预措施的可理解性。应探索使用随机对照试验设计进一步评估该干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7992/10335472/d8a81af87ef2/bmjopen-2022-069252f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7992/10335472/d8a81af87ef2/bmjopen-2022-069252f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7992/10335472/d8a81af87ef2/bmjopen-2022-069252f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Cultural adaptation of a UK evidence-based problem-solving intervention to support Polish prisoners at risk of suicidal behaviour: a cross-sectional survey using an Ecological Validity Model.采用生态有效性模型对英国循证问题解决干预措施进行文化调适,以支持有自杀行为风险的波兰囚犯:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 9;13(7):e069252. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069252.
2
Problem-solving training: assessing the feasibility and acceptability of delivering and evaluating a problem-solving training model for front-line prison staff and prisoners who self-harm.解决问题培训:评估为一线监狱工作人员和有自残行为的囚犯提供并评估一种解决问题培训模式的可行性和可接受性。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 3;9(10):e026095. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026095.
3
Implementation of a problem-solving training initiative to reduce self-harm in prisons: a qualitative perspective of prison staff, field researchers and prisoners at risk of self-harm.实施一项解决问题的培训计划以减少监狱中的自残行为:对监狱工作人员、实地研究人员和有自残风险的囚犯的定性研究
Health Justice. 2019 Jul 31;7(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40352-019-0094-9.
4
The effect of a peer-led problem-support mentor intervention on self-harm and violence in prison: An interrupted time series analysis using routinely collected prison data.同伴主导的问题支持导师干预对监狱中自残和暴力行为的影响:使用常规收集的监狱数据进行的中断时间序列分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jan 15;32:100702. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100702. eCollection 2021 Feb.
5
Working with women prisoners who seriously harm themselves: ratings of staff expressed emotion (EE).与严重自我伤害的女囚犯合作:工作人员表露情绪(EE)的评级
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2011 Feb;21(1):63-74. doi: 10.1002/cbm.795. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
6
[Suicidal behaviour in Belgian prisons: an overview and integrated prevention model].[比利时监狱中的自杀行为:概述与综合预防模式]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2022;64(3):166-172.
7
Suicidal ideation while incarcerated: Prevalence and correlates in a large sample of male prisoners in Flanders, Belgium.监禁期间的自杀意念:比利时弗拉芒大区大量男性囚犯样本中的患病率及相关因素
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2017 Nov-Dec;55:19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
8
Prison officers' attitudes towards self-harm in prisoners.监狱工作人员对囚犯自残行为的态度。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Sep-Oct;66:101490. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101490. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
9
Intensity of perceived stress and control of anger, anxiety and depression of people staying in Polish penitentiary institutions.波兰监狱机构中人员感知到的压力强度以及愤怒、焦虑和抑郁的控制情况。
Int J Prison Health. 2022 Jan 25;18(1):83-96. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-12-2020-0103. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
10
Prison staff and women prisoner's views on self-harm; their implications for service delivery and development: A qualitative study.监狱工作人员与女性囚犯对自我伤害的看法;其对服务提供与发展的影响:一项定性研究。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2010 Oct;20(4):274-84. doi: 10.1002/cbm.777.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence and risk factors for suicide attempts in prison.监狱中自杀未遂的发生率和危险因素。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2022 Nov;97:102190. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102190. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
2
Interventions to reduce suicidal thoughts and behaviours among people in contact with the criminal justice system: A global systematic review.减少与刑事司法系统有接触者自杀念头和行为的干预措施:一项全球系统评价。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Jan 14;44:101266. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101266. eCollection 2022 Feb.
3
Adherence is a key factor for interpreting the results of exercise interventions.
依从性是解释运动干预结果的关键因素。
Physiotherapy. 2021 Dec;113:8-11. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
4
The effect of a peer-led problem-support mentor intervention on self-harm and violence in prison: An interrupted time series analysis using routinely collected prison data.同伴主导的问题支持导师干预对监狱中自残和暴力行为的影响:使用常规收集的监狱数据进行的中断时间序列分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jan 15;32:100702. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100702. eCollection 2021 Feb.
5
Factors associated with the transition from suicidal ideation to suicide attempt in prison.与监狱中从自杀意念到自杀企图转变相关的因素。
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 13;63(1):e101. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.101.
6
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年 369 种疾病和伤害导致的全球负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
7
Risk factors for self-harm in prison: a systematic review and meta-analysis.监狱中自我伤害的风险因素:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;7(8):682-691. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30190-5.
8
Self-harm in prisons: what do we know and how can we move forwards?监狱中的自残行为:我们了解什么以及如何向前推进?
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;7(8):649-650. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30298-4.
9
Mental disorders and risk of suicide attempt in prisoners.精神障碍与囚犯自杀企图的风险。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;55(9):1145-1155. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01851-7. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
10
Translation and back-translation methodology in health research - a critique.健康研究中的翻译和回译方法——批判。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Feb;20(1):69-77. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1734453. Epub 2020 Feb 28.