• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估苏丹·本·阿卜杜勒阿齐兹人道主义城(SBAHC)护士电子交接班工具的心理测量特性。

Evaluating Psychometric Properties of the Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Humanitarian City (SBAHC) Nurses' Electronic Handover Tool.

作者信息

Al Baker Ahmad S, Ibrahim Fatima, Obaid Lina M, Obdamen Febee Rose, Dimaocor Ashraff

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Humanitarian City, Riyadh, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jun 6;15(6):e40026. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40026. eCollection 2023 Jun.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.40026
PMID:37425565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10323703/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Handover is crucial during the transfer of patient care between healthcare professionals.Successful handover maintains patients' safety and high-quality care. The electronic handover of patients' information is achievable, feasible, and potentially improves the quality of patient care. However, the introduction of the electronic handover is relatively recent and challenging for healthcare providers, especially nurses.

OBJECTIVES

Since Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Humanitarian City (SBAHC) has recently implemented an electronic handover system among nurses, the main aim of the current study was to develop a tool to assess the perception and barriers to electronic handover systems among nurses working at SBAHC and evaluate its psychometric properties.

METHODS

The tool content and face validity were assessed by the content validity ratio (CVR). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used as validity methods, while the test-retest and inter-item consistency were used as reliability measures. The sample size was planned as five times the number of questions and a total of 200 nurses participated in the study.

RESULTS

The criteria required for factor analysis were met as indicated by the results of the Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin test and Bartlett's test of sphericity. The reliability results showed a Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranging from 0.858 to 0.910 for the perception subscale and from 0.564 to 0.789 for the barrier subscale, and an overall interclass correlation of 0.986, p<0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed SBAHC electronic handover tool was valid and reliable, and it is advisable to consider it at the initial stages of implanting an electronic handover system to identify obstacles that are faced by the staff to be considered and addressed by the higher management.

摘要

引言

在医护人员之间进行患者护理交接时,交接工作至关重要。成功的交接可维护患者安全并提供高质量护理。患者信息的电子交接是可行的,并且有可能提高患者护理质量。然而,电子交接的引入相对较新,对医护人员,尤其是护士来说具有挑战性。

目的

由于苏丹·本·阿卜杜勒阿齐兹人道主义城(SBAHC)最近在护士中实施了电子交接系统,本研究的主要目的是开发一种工具,以评估在SBAHC工作的护士对电子交接系统的认知和障碍,并评估其心理测量特性。

方法

通过内容效度比(CVR)评估工具内容和表面效度。探索性和验证性因素分析用作效度方法,而重测法和项目间一致性用作信度测量方法。样本量计划为问题数量的五倍,共有200名护士参与了该研究。

结果

凯泽-迈耶-奥尔金检验和巴特利特球形度检验结果表明,满足了因素分析所需的标准。信度结果显示,认知子量表的克朗巴赫α系数在0.858至0.910之间,障碍子量表的克朗巴赫α系数在0.564至0.789之间,总体组内相关系数为0.986,p<0.001。

结论

所开发的SBAHC电子交接工具有效且可靠,在植入电子交接系统的初始阶段,建议考虑使用该工具,以识别工作人员面临的障碍,供高层管理人员考虑和解决。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeac/10323703/51f250a69414/cureus-0015-00000040026-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeac/10323703/4baac4c09b01/cureus-0015-00000040026-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeac/10323703/51f250a69414/cureus-0015-00000040026-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeac/10323703/4baac4c09b01/cureus-0015-00000040026-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeac/10323703/51f250a69414/cureus-0015-00000040026-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating Psychometric Properties of the Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Humanitarian City (SBAHC) Nurses' Electronic Handover Tool.评估苏丹·本·阿卜杜勒阿齐兹人道主义城(SBAHC)护士电子交接班工具的心理测量特性。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 6;15(6):e40026. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40026. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Measuring Nurses' Transition to Electronic Handover: Validation of the Perception and Adaptation Readiness of Electronic Handover Systems Scales.测量护士向电子交接班的过渡:电子交接班系统感知和适应准备量表的验证。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2021 May 3;39(11):644-653. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000721.
3
The Turkish version of the Handover Evaluation Scale: A validity and reliability study.《交接评估量表的土耳其语版本:效度与信度研究》
Int J Nurs Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):e12787. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12787. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
4
Designing and psychometric evaluation of disease-related fear scale (D-RFS) in adults with epilepsy: A sequential exploratory mixed methods design.成人癫痫患者疾病相关恐惧量表(D-RFS)的设计和心理计量学评估:序贯探索性混合方法设计。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Sep;110:107169. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107169. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
5
Development and Testing of the Psychometric Properties of the Attitude Towards Medical Device-related Pressure Ulcers/Injuries Questionnaire.医疗设备相关压疮/损伤态度问卷心理测量学特性的开发与测试
Wound Manag Prev. 2021 Mar;67(3):30-35.
6
Validity and Reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale in Turkey.土耳其新生儿姑息治疗态度量表的效度和信度
Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2021 Jun 1;29(2):212-220. doi: 10.5152/FNJN.2021.20041. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Reliability and Construct Validity of the Nurses' Intention to Use Deep Vein Thrombosis Preventive Measures Questionnaire.护士使用深静脉血栓预防措施问卷的信度和结构效度
J Nurs Meas. 2022 Mar 1;30(1):124-134. doi: 10.1891/JNM-D-20-00061. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
8
Construct validity and reliability of the Handover Evaluation Scale.交接班评估量表的结构效度和信度
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Feb;23(3-4):560-70. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12189. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
9
Disabled woman attitude scale: Reliability and validity study.残疾女性态度量表:信效度研究。
North Clin Istanb. 2021 Oct 28;8(5):454-463. doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.57701. eCollection 2021.
10
Development and psychometric testing of the patient participation in bedside handover survey.患者参与床边交接班调查的编制和心理测量学测试。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2492-2502. doi: 10.1111/hex.13569. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

本文引用的文献

1
How effective are electronic medication systems in reducing medication error rates and associated harm among hospital inpatients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.电子药物系统在降低医院住院患者用药错误率及相关伤害方面的效果如何?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jan 15;28(1):167-176. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa230.
2
Development and implementation of electronic medical handovers across psychiatric hospitals: quality improvement initiative.跨精神病医院电子医疗交接的开发与实施:质量改进举措
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Nov 18;8(4):e000630. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000630. eCollection 2019.
3
The NORSe: changing the way we communicate.
北方之星研究伦理委员会:改变我们的沟通方式。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Mar;100(3):161-164. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0020.
4
Implementing an electronic clinical handover system in a university teaching hospital.在一家大学教学医院实施电子临床交接班系统。
Ir J Med Sci. 2018 May;187(2):309-312. doi: 10.1007/s11845-017-1699-4. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
5
Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Standardized Handoff Protocols on Patient, Provider, and Organizational Outcomes.标准化交接班协议对患者、医护人员及组织结果影响的荟萃分析
Hum Factors. 2016 Dec;58(8):1187-1205. doi: 10.1177/0018720816672309. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
6
Implementing electronic handover: interventions to improve efficiency, safety and sustainability.实施电子交接班:提高效率、安全性和可持续性的干预措施。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Oct;28(5):608-614. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw082. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
7
Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.有序数据的验证性因子分析:稳健极大似然法与对角加权最小二乘法的比较
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):936-49. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7.
8
Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient handover in surgery: A systematic review.改善手术患者交接的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价。
Surgery. 2015 Jul;158(1):85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.017. Epub 2015 May 18.
9
How does nursing staff perceive the use of electronic handover reports? A questionnaire-based study.护理人员如何看待电子交接班报告的使用?一项基于问卷调查的研究。
Int J Telemed Appl. 2011;2011:505426. doi: 10.1155/2011/505426. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
10
Determination and quantification of content validity.内容效度的确定与量化。
Nurs Res. 1986 Nov-Dec;35(6):382-5.