• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喀拉拉邦普通人群中一个代表性子集的面部人体测量分析:一项初步研究。

Facial Anthropometric Analysis of a Representative Subset in an Average Kerala Population: A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Chitta Madhavi, Malathi Lekshmi

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Indian J Plast Surg. 2023 Feb 21;56(3):238-244. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761596. eCollection 2023 Jun.

DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1761596
PMID:37435342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10332907/
Abstract

The Neoclassical canons, originally framed based on the Renaissance artworks, vary across genders, races, and ages. This has been proved in multiple studies conducted on the Western population, but minimal studies exist on the Eastern population and lesser so on the Indian population. This study aims to define the standard Keralite face and assess its variation from the canons.  A total of 250 people of Kerala origin aged 18 to 40 years were studied over a period of 1 year in our institute. Standardized frontal and profile photographs of the subjects were taken. Twenty anthropometric measurements were taken and analyzed for variation between genders, from published Indian standards and their conformity to the Neoclassical canons.  Compared to the Keralite men, there were significant differences in 14 of 19 measurements in Keralite women. The men had wider and longer faces than women. Five of 10 measurements in females and 6 of 10 measurements in males significantly differed from the published Indian norms. The average Keralite face was wider, longer, and rounder. None of the facial proportions fit the Neoclassical canons.  The average Keralite face significantly differed from the Neoclassical canons and there were some significant variations between genders. This study highlights the need for a larger population-based study with more representation from various regions across India.

摘要

新古典主义标准最初是根据文艺复兴时期的艺术品制定的,存在性别、种族和年龄差异。这在针对西方人群进行的多项研究中得到了证实,但针对东方人群的研究较少,针对印度人群的研究更少。本研究旨在定义标准的喀拉拉邦人脸,并评估其与这些标准的差异。

在我们研究所,对250名年龄在18至40岁之间的喀拉拉邦人进行了为期1年的研究。拍摄了受试者标准化的正面和侧面照片。进行了20项人体测量,并分析了性别之间的差异、与已公布的印度标准的差异以及他们与新古典主义标准的符合程度。

与喀拉拉邦男性相比,喀拉拉邦女性的19项测量中有14项存在显著差异。男性的脸比女性更宽更长。女性的10项测量中有5项、男性的10项测量中有6项与已公布的印度规范有显著差异。喀拉拉邦人的平均脸更宽、更长、更圆。面部比例均不符合新古典主义标准。

喀拉拉邦人的平均脸与新古典主义标准有显著差异,性别之间也存在一些显著差异。本研究强调需要进行更大规模的基于人群的研究,印度各地区要有更多代表性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/10332907/593890278a1d/10-1055-s-0043-1761596-i2231697-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/10332907/3aaf9a3e5b84/10-1055-s-0043-1761596-i2231697-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/10332907/ca30cbc90c47/10-1055-s-0043-1761596-i2231697-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/10332907/bf0c87abf333/10-1055-s-0043-1761596-i2231697-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/10332907/60ffb272f7d8/10-1055-s-0043-1761596-i2231697-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/10332907/c093d3652c9f/10-1055-s-0043-1761596-i2231697-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/10332907/593890278a1d/10-1055-s-0043-1761596-i2231697-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/10332907/3aaf9a3e5b84/10-1055-s-0043-1761596-i2231697-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/10332907/ca30cbc90c47/10-1055-s-0043-1761596-i2231697-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/10332907/bf0c87abf333/10-1055-s-0043-1761596-i2231697-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/10332907/60ffb272f7d8/10-1055-s-0043-1761596-i2231697-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/10332907/c093d3652c9f/10-1055-s-0043-1761596-i2231697-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/10332907/593890278a1d/10-1055-s-0043-1761596-i2231697-6.jpg

相似文献

1
Facial Anthropometric Analysis of a Representative Subset in an Average Kerala Population: A Pilot Study.喀拉拉邦普通人群中一个代表性子集的面部人体测量分析:一项初步研究。
Indian J Plast Surg. 2023 Feb 21;56(3):238-244. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761596. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Analysis of Neoclassical Canons in Adult Kenyans of Indian Descent.对印度裔成年肯尼亚人的新古典主义标准的分析。
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2023 Mar;16(1):55-61. doi: 10.1177/19433875221077005. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
3
Are neoclassical canons valid for southern Chinese faces?南方人脸型适合新古典主义美学标准吗?
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052593. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
4
Historical Tools of Anthropometric Facial Assessment: A Systematic Raw Data Analysis on the Applicability of the Neoclassical Canons and Golden Ratio.历史上的人体测量面部评估工具:对新古典主义规范和黄金比例适用性的原始数据系统分析。
Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Jan 1;42(1):NP1-NP10. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab339.
5
Neoclassical facial canons in young adults.年轻人的新古典主义面部标准。
J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Nov;23(6):1693-8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826b816b.
6
Three-dimensional facial analyses of Indian and Malaysian women.印度和马来西亚女性的三维面部分析。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Jul-Sep;6(3):332-6. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.161872.
7
The validity of eight neoclassical facial canons in the Turkish adults.八种新古典面部标准在土耳其成年人中的有效性。
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2016;75(4):512-517. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2016.0028. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
8
The average African American male face: an anthropometric analysis.非裔美国男性平均面部特征:一项人体测量学分析。
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004 Mar-Apr;6(2):78-81. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.6.2.78.
9
The validity of three neo-classical facial canons in young adults originating from the Arabian Peninsula.源自阿拉伯半岛的三种新古典主义面部标准在年轻人中的有效性。
Head Face Med. 2015 Mar 13;11:4. doi: 10.1186/s13005-015-0064-y.
10
Neoclassical canons of facial beauty: Do we see the deviations?新古典主义面部美的标准:我们能看出偏差吗?
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 May;45(5):741-747. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.029. Epub 2017 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Anthropometric Analysis of Indian Faces: A Systematic Review.印度人脸型的人体测量分析:一项系统综述
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Jun;23(3):451-461. doi: 10.1007/s12663-024-02185-6. Epub 2024 Apr 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Marquardt's Facial Golden Decagon Mask and Its Fitness with South Indian Facial Traits.马夸特面部黄金十边形面具及其与南印度面部特征的适配性。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Apr;10(4):ZC49-52. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16791.7593. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
2
Three-dimensional facial analyses of Indian and Malaysian women.印度和马来西亚女性的三维面部分析。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Jul-Sep;6(3):332-6. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.161872.
3
[Morphometric analysis of nasal shapes and angles in young adults].[青年成年人鼻形和鼻角的形态计量学分析]
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Sep-Oct;80(5):397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
4
Assessment of Facial Golden Proportions among North Maharashtri-an Population.马哈拉施特拉邦北部人群面部黄金比例的评估
J Int Oral Health. 2013 Jun;5(3):48-54. Epub 2013 Jun 23.
5
Facial indices of north and South Indian adults: reliability in stature estimation and sexual dimorphism.印度南北部成年人群面部指数:身高估计中的可靠性及两性差异
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Aug;7(8):1540-2. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5497.3204. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
6
A systematic review of interethnic variability in facial dimensions.一项关于面部维度的民族间可变性的系统评价。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):874-881. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318200afdb.
7
Anthropometric and aesthetic analysis of the Indian American woman's face.印度裔美国女性面部的人体测量学和美学分析。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Nov;63(11):1825-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.10.032. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
8
International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races.不同种族/民族面部形态的国际人体测量学研究。
J Craniofac Surg. 2005 Jul;16(4):615-46. doi: 10.1097/01.scs.0000171847.58031.9e.
9
The Korean American woman's face: anthropometric measurements and quantitative analysis of facial aesthetics.韩裔美国女性的面部:人体测量与面部美学的定量分析
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004 Jul-Aug;6(4):244-52. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.6.4.244.
10
Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: revision of neoclassical canons.北美年轻成年白种人面部的垂直和水平比例:新古典主义准则的修订
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985 Mar;75(3):328-38. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198503000-00005.