• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施和维护用于移动电话的 SARS-CoV-2 接触者通知应用程序:芬兰的经验。

Implementing and Maintaining a SARS-CoV-2 Exposure Notification Application for Mobile Phones: The Finnish Experience.

机构信息

Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.

Gofore Oyj, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jul 13;9:e46563. doi: 10.2196/46563.

DOI:10.2196/46563
PMID:37440286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10375279/
Abstract

Exposure notification applications (ENAs) or digital proximity tracing apps were used in several countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this viewpoint, we share our experience of implementing and running the Finnish ENA (Koronavilkku), one of the national ENAs with the highest proportion of users during the pandemic. With the aim of strengthening public trust and increasing app uptake, there was a strong prioritization of privacy and data security for the end user throughout the ENA development. This, in turn, limited the use of the app as a tool for health care professionals and deeper insight into its potential effectiveness. The ENA was designed to supplement conventional contact tracing, rather than replace it, and to serve as an early warning system and a trigger for action for the user in case of potential exposure. The predefined target of 40% uptake in the population was achieved within 3 months of the ENA launch. We consider easy-to-understand information produced together with communication experts crucial during the changing pandemic situation. This information educated people about the app as one component in mitigating the pandemic. As the pandemic and its mitigation evolved, the ENA also needed adapting and updating. A few months after its launch, Finland joined European interoperability, which allowed the ENA to share information with ENAs of other countries. We added automatic token issuing to the ENA as of mid-2021. If added earlier and more comprehensively, automatization could have more effectively saved resources in health care services and prevented overburdening contact tracing teams, while also notifying potentially exposed individuals quicker and more reliably. In the spring of 2021, the number of active apps started to gradually decline. Quarantine and testing practices for asymptomatic vaccinated individuals following exposure to the virus were eased and home tests became more common, eventually replacing laboratory testing for much of the population. Taken together, this led to decreased token issuance, which weakened the potential public health usefulness of the app. A self-service option for token issuance would likely have prolonged the lifespan of the app. The ENA was discontinued in mid-2022. Regularly conducted surveys would have helped gain timely knowledge on the use and effectiveness of the app for better responding to the changing needs during the pandemic.

摘要

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,有几个国家使用了接触者暴露通知应用程序(ENA)或数字近距离追踪应用程序。在这篇观点文章中,我们分享了在大流行期间,我们实施和运行芬兰 ENA(Koronavilkku)的经验,该应用程序是用户比例最高的全国 ENA 之一。为了增强公众信任并提高应用程序的采用率,在整个 ENA 开发过程中,始终将最终用户的隐私和数据安全作为首要任务。这反过来又限制了该应用程序作为医疗保健专业人员的工具,并限制了对其潜在效果的深入了解。ENA 的设计目的是补充传统的接触者追踪,而不是替代它,并作为用户在潜在暴露情况下的预警系统和采取行动的触发因素。ENA 推出后 3 个月内,就达到了在人群中达到 40%采用率的预定目标。我们认为,在不断变化的大流行情况下,与传播专家一起制作易于理解的信息至关重要。这些信息使人们了解到该应用程序是减轻大流行的一个组成部分。随着大流行及其缓解措施的发展,ENA 也需要进行调整和更新。ENA 推出几个月后,芬兰加入了欧洲互操作性,这使得 ENA 能够与其他国家的 ENA 共享信息。自 2021 年年中以来,我们已向 ENA 添加了自动令牌颁发功能。如果更早且更全面地实现自动化,那么它可以更有效地为医疗保健服务节省资源,并防止接触者追踪团队负担过重,同时更快、更可靠地通知潜在暴露者。2021 年春季,活跃应用程序的数量开始逐渐减少。对接触病毒后无症状接种疫苗个体的隔离和检测措施变得更加宽松,家庭检测变得更加普遍,最终为大多数人取代了实验室检测。所有这些都导致令牌发行数量减少,削弱了该应用程序在公共卫生方面的潜在作用。自动令牌发行的自助选项可能会延长该应用程序的寿命。ENA 于 2022 年年中停止使用。定期进行调查将有助于及时了解应用程序的使用和效果,以便更好地应对大流行期间不断变化的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d30/10375279/e274237b8f78/publichealth_v9i1e46563_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d30/10375279/9a21d384ccf2/publichealth_v9i1e46563_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d30/10375279/2c60f4212578/publichealth_v9i1e46563_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d30/10375279/95d44a1a749e/publichealth_v9i1e46563_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d30/10375279/e274237b8f78/publichealth_v9i1e46563_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d30/10375279/9a21d384ccf2/publichealth_v9i1e46563_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d30/10375279/2c60f4212578/publichealth_v9i1e46563_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d30/10375279/95d44a1a749e/publichealth_v9i1e46563_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d30/10375279/e274237b8f78/publichealth_v9i1e46563_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementing and Maintaining a SARS-CoV-2 Exposure Notification Application for Mobile Phones: The Finnish Experience.实施和维护用于移动电话的 SARS-CoV-2 接触者通知应用程序:芬兰的经验。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jul 13;9:e46563. doi: 10.2196/46563.
2
Performance of the Swiss Digital Contact-Tracing App Over Various SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Waves: Repeated Cross-sectional Analyses.瑞士数字化接触者追踪应用在不同 SARS-CoV-2 大流行波次中的表现:重复横断面分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Nov 11;8(11):e41004. doi: 10.2196/41004.
3
Individual-Level Evaluation of the Exposure Notification Cascade in the SwissCovid Digital Proximity Tracing App: Observational Study.瑞士新冠数字接触追踪应用程序中暴露通知级联的个体水平评估:观察性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 May 19;8(5):e35653. doi: 10.2196/35653.
4
Using Venn Diagrams to Evaluate Digital Contact Tracing: Panel Survey Analysis.使用文氏图评估数字接触者追踪:面板调查分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Dec 6;7(12):e30004. doi: 10.2196/30004.
5
Challenges for Nontechnical Implementation of Digital Proximity Tracing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Media Analysis of the SwissCovid App.新冠疫情期间数字接触追踪的非技术实施挑战:瑞士新冠追踪应用的媒体分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 26;9(2):e25345. doi: 10.2196/25345.
6
A Data-Driven Simulation of the Exposure Notification Cascade for Digital Contact Tracing of SARS-CoV-2 in Zurich, Switzerland.基于数据的瑞士苏黎世 SARS-CoV-2 数字接触者追踪中暴露通知级联的仿真。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e218184. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8184.
7
Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature.数字接触者追踪应用程序的最佳实践指南:文献的跨学科综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 7;9(6):e27753. doi: 10.2196/27753.
8
The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.一般健康状况和与 COVID-19 的接近程度在接触者追踪应用程序使用中的作用:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892.
9
Adaptation and Utilization of a Postmarket Evaluation Model for Digital Contact Tracing Mobile Health Tools in the United States: Observational Cross-sectional Study.美国数字接触者追踪移动健康工具的上市后评估模型的调整和利用:观察性横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Mar 22;9:e38633. doi: 10.2196/38633.
10
Factors Associated With Using the COVID-19 Mobile Contact-Tracing App Among Individuals Diagnosed With SARS-CoV-2 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Observational Study.与在荷兰阿姆斯特丹被诊断患有 SARS-CoV-2 的个体使用 COVID-19 移动接触者追踪应用程序相关的因素:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 24;10(8):e31099. doi: 10.2196/31099.

引用本文的文献

1
Contact tracing strategies for infectious diseases: A systematic literature review.传染病接触者追踪策略:一项系统文献综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 9;5(5):e0004579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004579. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and effectiveness of case isolation and quarantine during a growing phase of the COVID-19 epidemic in Finland.在 COVID-19 疫情增长阶段,芬兰实施病例隔离和检疫的效果和效力。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 6;13(1):298. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27227-2.
2
Smartphone apps in the COVID-19 pandemic.智能手机应用在新冠疫情中的应用
Nat Biotechnol. 2022 Jul;40(7):1013-1022. doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01350-x. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
3
A Brief History of Exposure Notification During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States, 2020-2021.美国 2020-2021 年 COVID-19 大流行期间的接触者通知简史。
Public Health Rep. 2022 Nov-Dec;137(2_suppl):23S-28S. doi: 10.1177/00333549221099533. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
4
Public Perspectives on Exposure Notification Apps: A Patient and Citizen Co-Designed Study.公众对暴露通知应用程序的看法:一项患者与公民共同设计的研究
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 30;12(5):729. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050729.
5
: Factors Influencing the Adoption of Exposure Notification Apps Among Canadian Residents.影响加拿大居民采用暴露通知应用程序的因素
Front Digit Health. 2022 Mar 11;4:842661. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.842661. eCollection 2022.
6
​The SwissCovid Digital Proximity Tracing App after one year: Were expectations fulfilled?瑞士新冠数字近距离追踪应用程序运行一年后:期望达成了吗?
Swiss Med Wkly. 2021 Sep 8;151(35-36). doi: 10.4414/SMW.2021.w30031.
7
Use and Users of the Web-Based Omaolo Covid-19 Symptom Self-Assesment Tool in Finland Since March 16, 2020.自 2020 年 3 月 16 日起,芬兰使用和用户 Omaolo COVID-19 症状自我评估工具的情况。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27;281:739-743. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210270.
8
Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature.数字接触者追踪应用程序的最佳实践指南:文献的跨学科综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 7;9(6):e27753. doi: 10.2196/27753.
9
Learning about COVID-19-related stigma, quarantine and isolation experiences in Finland.了解芬兰与 COVID-19 相关的污名、隔离和隔离体验。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0247962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247962. eCollection 2021.
10
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.