Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Centre for Accident Research & Road Safety-Queensland (CARRS-Q), School of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Health, 130 Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia; Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI), School of Public Health and Social Work Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Faculty of Health, 60 Musk Ave, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia.
Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Centre for Accident Research & Road Safety-Queensland (CARRS-Q), School of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Health, 130 Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia.
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Oct;191:107190. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107190. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
Professional driver education and training has traditionally been used to improve the driving skills of young people with the expectation that they will drive more safely and therefore be less likely to crash. Despite this, much research has failed to find such an effect. The Goals for Driver Education (GDE) is a theoretical framework developed to improve the effectiveness of driver education. The GDE seeks to draw attention to a broader array of factors that may influence the driving of young people and hence increase the scope of what is included in driver education and training. Within the GDE, factors affecting driving and driver education are grouped into combinations of four hierarchical levels that represent influences on driving at increasing levels of abstraction (GDE level 1: Vehicle manoeuvring; GDE level 2: Mastery of traffic situations; GDE level 3: Goals and contexts of driving; GDE level 4: Goals for life and skills for living) and three types of individual competencies (Knowledge and skills; Risk-increasing factors; Self-evaluation skills). However, to date there have been few, if any, attempts to operationalise the GDE in a quantitative way. In response, the Perceptions of Driver Education Scale (PDES) was developed to gain an understanding of what two important stakeholder groups in the driver education and training ecosystem perceived to be important to be taught to novice drivers. Understanding these perceptions may lead to greater acceptance of the driver education and training that is designed and make it more effective. Following rigorous scale development procedures, thirty-five items were developed a priori using expert opinion and deployed, via an online survey, to a sample of parents of novice drivers (N = 518) and a separate sample of novice drivers (N = 247), both from Queensland, Australia. Exploratory Factor Analysis was performed on the parent responses and Confirmatory Factor Analysis was performed using the novice driver responses. A 29-item 9 factor solution was judged to be the best fit with the overall scale and each of the factors displaying strong levels of internal consistency. The 9 factors cover most hierarchical level and competency combinations, although removal of items meant that there is no representation concerning perceptions of Self-evaluation skills related to Level 3: Goals and contexts of driving within the PDES. Overall, the PDES is a valid and reliable instrument for investigating the aspects of driver education and training that are perceived as important by novice drivers and parents. The scale may also be applicable for use with other stakeholder groups and could also be used to evaluate pre-existing driver education and training programs.
专业驾驶员教育和培训传统上用于提高年轻人的驾驶技能,期望他们更安全地驾驶,从而降低发生事故的可能性。尽管如此,许多研究都未能发现这种效果。驾驶员教育目标 (GDE) 是一个理论框架,旨在提高驾驶员教育的有效性。GDE 旨在引起人们对可能影响年轻人驾驶的更广泛因素的关注,从而扩大驾驶员教育和培训的范围。在 GDE 中,影响驾驶和驾驶员教育的因素分为四个层次结构水平的组合,这些水平结构代表了对驾驶的影响程度越来越抽象(GDE 水平 1:车辆操纵;GDE 水平 2:掌握交通情况;GDE 水平 3:驾驶目标和背景;GDE 水平 4:生活目标和生活技能)和三种类型的个人能力(知识和技能;增加风险的因素;自我评估技能)。然而,迄今为止,很少有(如果有的话)尝试以定量方式实施 GDE。有鉴于此,开发了驾驶员教育感知量表 (PDES),以了解驾驶员教育和培训生态系统中的两个重要利益相关者群体认为向新手驾驶员传授什么内容很重要。了解这些看法可能会导致人们更接受设计的驾驶员教育和培训,并使其更有效。在严格的量表开发程序之后,使用专家意见预先开发了 35 个项目,并通过在线调查将其部署到来自澳大利亚昆士兰州的新手驾驶员的父母样本(N=518)和新手驾驶员的单独样本(N=247)。对父母的回应进行了探索性因素分析,对新手驾驶员的回应进行了验证性因素分析。判断 29 项 9 因素解决方案最适合整体量表,每个因素都显示出较强的内部一致性水平。这 9 个因素涵盖了大多数层次结构和能力组合,尽管项目的删除意味着 PDES 中没有与 3 级:目标和背景相关的自我评估技能的感知代表。总体而言,PDES 是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于调查新手驾驶员和家长认为驾驶员教育和培训重要的方面。该量表也可能适用于其他利益相关者群体,也可用于评估现有的驾驶员教育和培训计划。