Medical Research and Education Center of Lomonosov, Moscow State University, 27/10 Lomonosov Prospect, Moscow, 119192, Russia.
Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 27/1 Lomonosov Prospect, Moscow, 119192, Russia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09493-6.
BACKGROUND: To date, no opinion surveys has been conducted among Russian physicians to study their awareness about artificial intelligence. With a survey, we aimed to evaluate the attitudes of stakeholders to the usage of technologies employing AI in the field of medicine and healthcare and identify challenges and perspectives to introducing AI. METHODS: We conducted a 12-question online survey using Google Forms. The survey consisted of questions related to the recognition of AI and attitudes towards it, the direction of development of AI in medicine and the possible risks of using AI in medicine. RESULTS: 301 doctors took part in the survey. 107 (35.6%) responded that they are familiar with AI. The vast majority of participants considered AI useful in the medical field (85%). The advantage of AI was associated with the ability to analyze huge volumes of clinically relevant data in real time (79%). Respondents highlighted areas where AI would be most useful-organizational optimization (74%), biopharmaceutical research (67%), and disease diagnosis (52%). Among the possible problems when using AI, they noted the lack of flexibility and limited application on controversial issues (64% and 60% of respondents). 56% believe that AI decision making will be difficult if inadequate information is presented for analysis. A third of doctors fear that specialists with little experience took part in the development of AI, and 89% of respondents believe that doctors should participate in the development of AI for medicine and healthcare. Only 20 participants (6.6%) responded that they agree that AI can replace them at work. At the same time, 76% of respondents believe that in the future, doctors using AI will replace those who do not. CONCLUSIONS: Russian doctors are for AI in medicine. Most of the respondents believe that AI will not replace them in the future and will become a useful tool. First of all, for optimizing organizational processes, research and diagnostics of diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the Lomonosov Moscow State University Medical Research and Education Center (IRB00010587).
背景：迄今为止，尚无针对俄罗斯医生的意见调查，以了解他们对人工智能的认知。通过调查，我们旨在评估利益相关者对在医学和医疗保健领域使用采用人工智能技术的态度，并确定引入人工智能的挑战和前景。
方法：我们使用 Google 表单进行了一项 12 个问题的在线调查。该调查包括与人工智能的识别及其态度相关的问题、医学中人工智能的发展方向以及在医学中使用人工智能的可能风险。
结果：301 名医生参加了调查。其中 107 人（35.6％）表示熟悉 AI。绝大多数参与者认为 AI 在医学领域有用（85％）。AI 的优势与实时分析大量与临床相关数据的能力有关（79％）。受访者强调了 AI 最有用的领域-组织优化（74％），生物制药研究（67％）和疾病诊断（52％）。在使用 AI 时可能出现的问题中，他们指出了缺乏灵活性和在有争议的问题上的应用有限（64％和 60％的受访者）。56％的人认为，如果提供的分析信息不足，AI 的决策将很困难。三分之一的医生担心很少有经验的专家参与了 AI 的开发，而 89％的受访者认为医生应该参与医学和医疗保健领域的 AI 开发。只有 20 名参与者（6.6％）表示同意 AI 可以代替他们工作。同时，76％的受访者认为，将来，使用 AI 的医生将取代那些不使用 AI 的医生。
结论：俄罗斯医生支持医学中的 AI。大多数受访者认为，在未来，AI 不会取代他们，而将成为有用的工具。首先，用于优化组织流程，研究和诊断疾病。
试验注册：这项研究得到了莫斯科国立罗蒙诺索夫大学医学研究与教育中心的地方伦理委员会的批准（IRB00010587）。
J Med Internet Res. 2019-3-25
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021-10-9
J Med Internet Res. 2023-4-4
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022-5-25
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2022-6
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024-10-8
Am J Clin Pathol. 2021-5-18
Lab Med. 2020-11-2
J Med Internet Res. 2020-5-14
J Med Internet Res. 2019-3-25
Zotero 插件
