Suppr超能文献

为严重残疾新生儿做决策。

Making decisions for the severely handicapped newborn.

作者信息

Freeman J M

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):285-96. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-285.

Abstract

Standard ethical approaches to decision-making which are based on rights, duties, obligations, beneficence, or best interests often seem inadequate or insufficient when applied to the individual infant, as in the case of Baby Jane Doe. A process approach which takes account of moral theory, but which allows tolerance, within limits, for a possible range of decisions, would appear to offer more reasonable decisions. However, any decision must be based on good facts and accurate prognosis. Pending the availability of medical records on Baby Jane Doe, judgment of the decisions made at Stony Brook must be suspended.

摘要

基于权利、义务、责任、善行或最大利益的标准伦理决策方法,在应用于个体婴儿时,比如“无名女婴简”的案例,往往显得不充分或不足。一种考虑到道德理论,但在一定限度内允许对一系列可能的决策持宽容态度的过程方法,似乎能提供更合理的决策。然而,任何决策都必须基于充分的事实和准确的预后情况。在获得“无名女婴简”的病历之前,必须暂停对石溪分校所做决策的评判。

相似文献

1
Making decisions for the severely handicapped newborn.为严重残疾新生儿做决策。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):285-96. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-285.
2
The antiabortion movement and Baby Jane Doe.反堕胎运动与无名女婴简
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):255-69. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-255.
3
Reponse to Freeman: the Stony Brook perspective.对弗里曼的回应:石溪分校的观点。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):295-6. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-295.
4
Survival at what cost? Origins and effects of the modern controversy on treating severely handicapped newborns.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):199-213. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-199.
5
The case of Baby Jane Doe. 2. Baby Jane Doe in the courts.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1984 Feb;14(1):13-9.
6
Legal aspects of withholding treatment from handicapped newborns: substantive issues.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):215-30. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-215.
7
Government intercedes in "Baby Jane Doe".
Science. 1983 Nov 25;222(4626):908. doi: 10.1126/science.6227081.
9
Civil rights and regulatory wrongs: the Reagan administration and the medical treatment of handicapped infants.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):231-54. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-231.
10
Weber v. Stony Brook Hospital.韦伯诉石溪医院案
North East Rep Second Ser. 1983 Oct 23;456:1186-8.

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验