Freeman J M
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):285-96. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-285.
Standard ethical approaches to decision-making which are based on rights, duties, obligations, beneficence, or best interests often seem inadequate or insufficient when applied to the individual infant, as in the case of Baby Jane Doe. A process approach which takes account of moral theory, but which allows tolerance, within limits, for a possible range of decisions, would appear to offer more reasonable decisions. However, any decision must be based on good facts and accurate prognosis. Pending the availability of medical records on Baby Jane Doe, judgment of the decisions made at Stony Brook must be suspended.
基于权利、义务、责任、善行或最大利益的标准伦理决策方法，在应用于个体婴儿时，比如“无名女婴简”的案例，往往显得不充分或不足。一种考虑到道德理论，但在一定限度内允许对一系列可能的决策持宽容态度的过程方法，似乎能提供更合理的决策。然而，任何决策都必须基于充分的事实和准确的预后情况。在获得“无名女婴简”的病历之前，必须暂停对石溪分校所做决策的评判。
