Suppr超能文献

三维打印生物陶瓷支架采用直接喷墨书写技术用于颅颌面骨再生。

Three-Dimensional Printing Bioceramic Scaffolds Using Direct-Ink-Writing for Craniomaxillofacial Bone Regeneration.

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2023 Jul;29(7):332-345. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2023.0082.

Abstract

Defects characterized as large osseous voids in bone, in certain circumstances, are difficult to treat, requiring extensive treatments which lead to an increased financial burden, pain, and prolonged hospital stays. Grafts exist to aid in bone tissue regeneration (BTR), among which ceramic-based grafts have become increasingly popular due to their biocompatibility and resorbability. BTR using bioceramic materials such as β-tricalcium phosphate has seen tremendous progress and has been extensively used in the fabrication of biomimetic scaffolds through the three-dimensional printing (3DP) workflow. 3DP has hence revolutionized BTR by offering unparalleled potential for the creation of complex, patient, and anatomic location-specific structures. More importantly, it has enabled the production of biomimetic scaffolds with porous structures that mimic the natural extracellular matrix while allowing for cell growth-a critical factor in determining the overall success of the BTR modality. While the concept of 3DP bioceramic bone tissue scaffolds for human applications is nascent, numerous studies have highlighted its potential in restoring both form and function of critically sized defects in a wide variety of translational models. In this review, we summarize these recent advancements and present a review of the engineering principles and methodologies that are vital for using 3DP technology for craniomaxillofacial reconstructive applications. Moreover, we highlight future advances in the field of dynamic 3D printed constructs via shape-memory effect, and comment on pharmacological manipulation and bioactive molecules required to treat a wider range of boney defects.

摘要

在某些情况下,特征为大的骨腔隙的缺陷难以治疗,需要广泛的治疗,这会导致增加经济负担、疼痛和延长住院时间。移植物用于帮助骨组织再生(BTR),其中陶瓷基移植物由于其生物相容性和可吸收性而变得越来越流行。使用生物陶瓷材料(如β-磷酸三钙)进行 BTR 取得了巨大进展,并已广泛用于通过三维打印(3DP)工作流程制造仿生支架。3DP 通过为创建复杂、个体化和解剖位置特定的结构提供无与伦比的潜力,从而彻底改变了 BTR。更重要的是,它能够生产具有多孔结构的仿生支架,这些支架模仿天然细胞外基质,同时允许细胞生长——这是决定 BTR 方式整体成功的关键因素。虽然用于人类应用的 3DP 生物陶瓷骨组织支架的概念还处于起步阶段,但许多研究已经强调了其在恢复各种转化模型中临界尺寸缺陷的形态和功能方面的潜力。在这篇综述中,我们总结了这些最新进展,并介绍了对于使用 3DP 技术进行颅颌面重建应用至关重要的工程原理和方法。此外,我们强调了通过形状记忆效应实现动态 3D 打印构建的未来进展,并评论了治疗更广泛骨缺陷所需的药理学处理和生物活性分子。

相似文献

1
Three-Dimensional Printing Bioceramic Scaffolds Using Direct-Ink-Writing for Craniomaxillofacial Bone Regeneration.
Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2023 Jul;29(7):332-345. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2023.0082.
2
Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair.
Acta Biomater. 2019 Jan 15;84:16-33. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.039. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
3
3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds: From bone tissue engineering to tumor therapy.
Acta Biomater. 2018 Oct 1;79:37-59. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.026. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
4
Support-less ceramic 3D printing of bioceramic structures using a hydrogel bath.
Biofabrication. 2023 Apr 12;15(3). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/acc903.
5
3D printing of sponge spicules-inspired flexible bioceramic-based scaffolds.
Biofabrication. 2022 Apr 22;14(3). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac66ff.
7
Recent Advances in 3D Printing of Smart Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering and Regeneration.
Adv Mater. 2024 Aug;36(34):e2403641. doi: 10.1002/adma.202403641. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
8
Three-Dimensional Printing of Hollow-Struts-Packed Bioceramic Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015 Nov 4;7(43):24377-83. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b08911. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of Bone Defects and Nonunion via Novel Delivery Mechanisms, Growth Factors, and Stem Cells: A Review.
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2024 Dec 9;10(12):7314-7336. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01279. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
2
Personalized bioceramic grafts for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration.
Int J Oral Sci. 2024 Oct 31;16(1):62. doi: 10.1038/s41368-024-00327-7.
3
Biomimetic Tissue Engineering Strategies for Craniofacial Applications.
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 Oct 18;9(10):636. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9100636.
7
3D Printing Applications for Craniomaxillofacial Reconstruction: A Sweeping Review.
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2023 Dec 11;9(12):6586-6609. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01171. Epub 2023 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Engineering 3D Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds to Reconstruct Critical-Sized Calvaria Defects in a Skeletally Immature Pig Model.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Aug 1;152(2):270e-280e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010258. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
Manufacturing artificial bone allografts: a perspective.
Biomater Transl. 2022 Mar 28;3(1):65-80. doi: 10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.01.007. eCollection 2022.
3
The presence of 3D printing in orthopedics: A clinical and material review.
J Orthop Res. 2023 Mar;41(3):601-613. doi: 10.1002/jor.25388. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
5
Transforming the Degradation Rate of β-tricalcium Phosphate Bone Replacement Using 3-Dimensional Printing.
Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Dec 1;87(6):e153-e162. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002965.
6
A dual-ink 3D printing strategy to engineer pre-vascularized bone scaffolds in-vitro.
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021 Apr;123:111976. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.111976. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
8
Three-Dimensionally-Printed Bioactive Ceramic Scaffolds: Construct Effects on Bone Regeneration.
J Craniofac Surg. 2021 May 1;32(3):1177-1181. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007146.
9
Three-Dimensional Printing for Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering.
Tissue Eng Part A. 2020 Dec;26(23-24):1303-1311. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0186. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
10
3D printing of ceramic-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: an overview.
J Mater Chem B. 2018 Jul 21;6(27):4397-4412. doi: 10.1039/c8tb00677f. Epub 2018 Jul 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验