Suppr超能文献

基于国际创伤访谈的难民临床样本中 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍的结构。

The structure of ICD-11 post traumatic stress disorder in a clinical sample of refugees based on the International Trauma Interview.

机构信息

Competence Centre for Transcultural Psychiatry, Mental Health Centre Ballerup, Copenhagen University Hospital - Mental Health Services CPH, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Public Health and Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2023 Sep;148(3):302-309. doi: 10.1111/acps.13592. Epub 2023 Jul 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ICD-11 proposes fundamental changes to the PTSD diagnostic criteria, prompting thorough validation. While this is ideally carried out based on diagnostic interviews, most-and in the case of transcultural psychiatry all-studies have relied on self-reported measures. In this study, we used the International Trauma Interview (ITI) to assess the factor structure of ICD-11 PTSD symptoms in a sample of trauma-affected refugees.

METHOD

The ITI was administered with a sample of refugees (n = 198), originating mainly from the Greater Middle East. The symptom ratings were subjected to a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), comparing the ICD-11 concordant three-factor model with alternative two- and one-factor models.

RESULTS

The overall fit was adequate for both the two- and three-factor models, but favored the two-factor model. Results for both models indicated local misspecifications and that item 5, hypervigilance, displayed a suboptimal loading.

CONCLUSION

The results generally support the use of the ITI in a severely trauma-affected refugee population, albeit with particular attention needed in the administration of item 5. The superior fit of a two-factor model warrants further testing across populations.

摘要

背景

ICD-11 对 PTSD 的诊断标准提出了根本性的改变,这需要进行彻底的验证。虽然这理想情况下是基于诊断访谈进行的,但大多数——在跨文化精神病学的情况下,所有研究都依赖于自我报告的测量。在这项研究中,我们使用国际创伤访谈(ITI)在受创伤影响的难民样本中评估 ICD-11 PTSD 症状的因素结构。

方法

ITI 被用于一个难民样本(n=198),他们主要来自大中东地区。症状评分进行了验证性因素分析(CFA),比较了 ICD-11 一致的三因素模型与替代的两因素和一因素模型。

结果

两种模型的整体拟合度都足够,但更倾向于两因素模型。两种模型的结果都表明存在局部指定不当的情况,且第 5 项(警觉过度)的负荷表现不佳。

结论

结果总体上支持在严重受创伤影响的难民群体中使用 ITI,但在管理第 5 项时需要特别注意。两因素模型的更好拟合度需要在不同人群中进一步测试。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验