Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
The University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct 10;41(29):4643-4651. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02525. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is a newly established standard treatment for rectal adenocarcinoma. Current methods to communicate magnitudes of regression during TNT are subjective and imprecise. Magnetic resonance tumor regression grade (MR-TRG) is an existing, but rarely used, regression grading system. Prospective validation of MR-TRG correlation with pathologic response in patients undergoing TNT is lacking. Utility of adding diffusion-weighted imaging to MR-TRG is also unknown.
We conducted a multi-institutional prospective imaging substudy within NRG-GI002 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02921256) examining the ability of MR-based imaging to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) and correlate MR-TRG with the pathologic neoadjuvant response score (NAR). Serial MRIs were needed from 110 patients. Three radiologists independently, then collectively, reviewed each MRI for complete response (mriCR), which was tested for positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity with pCR. MR-TRG was examined for association with the pathologic NAR score. All team members were blinded to pathologic data.
A total of 121 patients from 71 institutions met criteria: 28% were female (n = 34), 84% White (n = 101), and median age was 55 (24-78 years). Kappa scores for T- and N-stage after TNT were 0.38 and 0.88, reflecting fair agreement and near-perfect agreement, respectively. Calling an mriCR resulted in a kappa score of 0.82 after chemotherapy and 0.56 after TNT reflected near-perfect agreement and moderate agreement, respectively. MR-TRG scores were associated with pCR ( < .01) and NAR ( < .0001), PPV for pCR was 40% (95% CI, 26 to 53), and NPV was 84% (95% CI, 75 to 94).
MRI alone is a poor tool to distinguish pCR in rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing TNT. However, the MR-TRG score presents a now validated method, correlated with pathologic NAR, which can objectively measure regression magnitude during TNT.
全新辅助治疗(TNT)是直肠腺癌的一种新确立的标准治疗方法。目前,用于在 TNT 期间交流消退程度的方法是主观且不精确的。磁共振肿瘤消退分级(MR-TRG)是一种现有的但很少使用的消退分级系统。缺乏对 TNT 患者中 MR-TRG 与病理反应之间相关性的前瞻性验证。添加扩散加权成像对 MR-TRG 的效用也尚不清楚。
我们在 NRG-GI002 中进行了一项多机构前瞻性成像子研究(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02921256),研究了基于磁共振的成像预测病理完全缓解(pCR)的能力,并将 MR-TRG 与病理新辅助反应评分(NAR)相关联。需要从 110 名患者中获得连续的 MRI。三位放射科医生独立地、然后集体地对每例 MRI 进行完全缓解(mriCR)评估,并用 pCR 对其进行阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、敏感性和特异性的测试。检查了 MR-TRG 与病理 NAR 评分的相关性。所有团队成员均对病理数据进行了盲法处理。
来自 71 个机构的 121 名患者符合标准:28%为女性(n=34),84%为白人(n=101),中位年龄为 55 岁(24-78 岁)。T 期和 N 期在 TNT 后的 Kappa 评分分别为 0.38 和 0.88,反映出公平的一致性和近乎完美的一致性。化疗后 mriCR 的 Kappa 评分为 0.82,TNT 后为 0.56,分别反映出近乎完美的一致性和中度一致性。MR-TRG 评分与 pCR 相关(<.01)和 NAR 相关(<.0001),pCR 的 PPV 为 40%(95%CI,26-53),NPV 为 84%(95%CI,75-94)。
单独使用 MRI 是一种较差的工具,无法区分在接受 TNT 的直肠腺癌中是否发生 pCR。然而,MR-TRG 评分提供了一种现已得到验证的方法,与病理 NAR 相关,可客观测量 TNT 期间的消退程度。