Morizet-Davis Jonathan, Marting Vidaurre Nirvana A, Reinmuth Evelyn, Rezaei-Chiyaneh Esmaeil, Schlecht Valentin, Schmidt Susanne, Singh Kripal, Vargas-Carpintero Ricardo, Wagner Moritz, von Cossel Moritz
Biobased Resources in the Bioeconomy (340b) Institute of Crop Science University of Hohenheim 70599 Stuttgart Germany.
Department of Plant Production and Genetics at Urmia University Urmia Iran.
Glob Chall. 2023 Apr 27;7(7):2200225. doi: 10.1002/gch2.202200225. eCollection 2023 Jul.
The current geological epoch is characterized by anthropogenic activity that greatly impacts on natural ecosystems and their integrity. The complex networks of ecosystem services (ESs) are often ignored because the provision of natural resources, such as food and industrial crops, is mistakenly viewed as an independent process separate from ecosystems and ignoring the impacts on ecosystems. Recently, research has intensified on how to evaluate and manage ES to minimize environmental impacts, but it remains unclear how to balance anthropogenic activity and ecosystem integrity. This paper reviews the main ESs at farm level including provisioning, regulating, habitat, and cultural services. For these ESs, synergies are outlined and evaluated along with the respective practices (e.g., cover- and intercropping) and ES suppliers (e.g., pollinators and biocontrol agents). Further, several farm-level ES trade-offs are discussed along with a proposal for their evaluation. Finally, a framework for stakeholder approaches specific to farm-level ES is put forward, along with an outlook on how existing precision agriculture technologies can be adapted for improved assessment of ES bundles. This is believed to provide a useful framework for both decision makers and stakeholders to facilitate the development of more sustainable and resilient farming systems.
当前的地质时代以人类活动为特征,这种活动对自然生态系统及其完整性产生了重大影响。生态系统服务(ESs)的复杂网络常常被忽视,因为诸如粮食和经济作物等自然资源的供应被错误地视为一个独立于生态系统的过程,而忽略了对生态系统的影响。最近,关于如何评估和管理生态系统服务以尽量减少环境影响的研究有所加强,但如何平衡人类活动与生态系统完整性仍不明确。本文综述了农场层面的主要生态系统服务,包括供给服务、调节服务、生境服务和文化服务。针对这些生态系统服务,概述并评估了协同效应以及各自的实践活动(如覆盖种植和间作)和生态系统服务提供者(如传粉者和生物防治剂)。此外,还讨论了一些农场层面的生态系统服务权衡,并提出了评估建议。最后,提出了一个针对农场层面生态系统服务的利益相关者方法框架,以及关于如何调整现有精准农业技术以改进生态系统服务束评估的展望。这被认为可为决策者和利益相关者提供一个有用的框架,以促进更可持续和有韧性的农业系统的发展。