Suppr超能文献

意识及其难题:区分本体论与进化论

Consciousness and its hard problems: separating the ontological from the evolutionary.

作者信息

Lacalli Thurston

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 7;14:1196576. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1196576. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Few of the many theories devised to account for consciousness are explicit about the role they ascribe to evolution, and a significant fraction, by their silence on the subject, treat evolutionary processes as being, in effect, irrelevant. This is a problem for biological realists trying to assess the applicability of competing theories of consciousness to taxa other than our own, and across evolutionary time. Here, as an aid to investigating such questions, a consciousness "machine" is employed as conceptual device for thinking about the different ways ontology and evolution contribute to the emergence of a consciousness composed of distinguishable contents. A key issue is the nature of the evolutionary innovations required for any kind of consciousness to exist, specifically whether this is due to the underappreciated properties of electromagnetic (EM) field effects, as in neurophysical theories, or, for theories where there is no such requirement, including computational and some higher-order theories (here, as a class, algorithmic theories), neural connectivity and the pattern of information flow that connectivity encodes are considered a sufficient explanation for consciousness. In addition, for consciousness to evolve in a non-random way, there must be a link between emerging consciousness and behavior. For the neurophysical case, an EM field-based scenario shows that distinct contents can be produced in the absence of an ability to consciously control action, i.e., without agency. This begs the question of how agency is acquired, which from this analysis would appear to be less of an evolutionary question than a developmental one. Recasting the problem in developmental terms highlights the importance of real-time feedback mechanisms for transferring agency from evolution to the individual, the implication being, for a significant subset of theories, that agency requires a learning process repeated once in each generation. For that subset of theories the question of how an evolved consciousness can exist will then have two components, of accounting for conscious experience as a phenomenon on the one hand, and agency on the other. This reduces one large problem to two, simplifying the task of investigation and providing what may prove an easier route toward their solution.

摘要

为了解释意识而提出的众多理论中,很少有理论明确阐述它们赋予进化的角色,而且相当一部分理论在这个问题上保持沉默,实际上将进化过程视为无关紧要。对于试图评估相互竞争的意识理论在除人类之外的其他生物分类群以及跨越进化时间的适用性的生物实在论者来说,这是个问题。在此,作为研究此类问题的一种辅助手段,一个意识“机器”被用作概念工具,来思考本体论和进化以不同方式促成由可区分内容构成的意识出现的情况。一个关键问题是任何一种意识存在所需的进化创新的本质,具体而言,这是像神经物理理论中那样归因于未得到充分认识的电磁场效应特性,还是对于不存在此类要求的理论,包括计算理论和一些高阶理论(在此作为一类算法理论)而言,神经连接以及连接所编码的信息流模式被认为足以解释意识。此外,为了使意识以非随机的方式进化,新兴意识与行为之间必须存在联系。就神经物理情况而言,基于电磁场的设想表明,在缺乏有意识控制行动能力(即没有能动性)的情况下也能产生不同的内容。这就引出了能动性是如何获得的问题,从这种分析来看,这似乎与其说是一个进化问题,不如说是一个发育问题。从发育角度重新审视这个问题凸显了实时反馈机制对于将能动性从进化传递给个体的重要性,这意味着,对于相当一部分理论来说,能动性需要在每一代中重复一次的学习过程。对于那部分理论而言,进化后的意识如何能够存在的问题将有两个方面,一方面是解释作为一种现象的有意识体验,另一方面是解释能动性。这将一个大问题简化为两个问题,简化了研究任务,并可能提供一条更容易解决这些问题的途径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b721/10362341/46c6214236ad/fpsyg-14-1196576-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验