• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自由放任式领导在人才管理中的作用:来自孟加拉国制药行业的证据。

Role of laissez-faire leadership in talent management: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry of Bangladesh.

作者信息

Ali Mohammad, Ullah Muhammad Shariat

机构信息

Department of Business Administration in Management Studies, Bangladesh University of Professionals (BUP), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Department of Organization Strategy & Leadership, Faculty of Business Studies, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Jun 15;9(6):e17234. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17234. eCollection 2023 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17234
PMID:37484267
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10361365/
Abstract

Laissez-faire leadership is mainly perceived as zero leadership, and research on it is relatively scant compared with other dominant approaches to leadership. Although the adverse effects of laissez-faire leadership have been well examined, its influence on talent management (TM) has been undiscovered. This study assessed the impact of laissez-faire leadership on TM strategies, including talent attraction, retention, engagement, and development. Data were collected from 460 employees of pharmaceutical companies in Bangladesh using judgmental sampling. Structural equation modeling was employed to test the hypothesized relationships between laissez-faire leadership and TM strategies using social exchange theory. This study found positive effects of laissez-faire leadership on talent attraction, retention, development, and engagement. These findings suggest that if talented employees are given freedom, they tend to engage and secure more opportunities for self-directed development by solving problems independently. This study contributes to the understanding of how laissez-faire leadership may constructively affect TM in the context of a developing economy's pharmaceutical industry. Finally, this study provides recommendations for practitioners of pharmaceutical companies to improve their strategic choices regarding laissez-faire leadership to ensure better TM strategy practices.

摘要

自由放任式领导主要被视为零领导,与其他占主导地位的领导方式相比,对其的研究相对较少。尽管自由放任式领导的负面影响已得到充分研究,但其对人才管理(TM)的影响尚未被发现。本研究评估了自由放任式领导对人才管理策略的影响,包括人才吸引、保留、敬业度和发展。使用判断抽样法从孟加拉国制药公司的460名员工中收集数据。采用结构方程模型,运用社会交换理论来检验自由放任式领导与人才管理策略之间的假设关系。本研究发现自由放任式领导对人才吸引、保留、发展和敬业度有积极影响。这些发现表明,如果给予有才能的员工自由,他们往往会通过独立解决问题来更加投入并获得更多自我导向发展的机会。本研究有助于理解在发展中经济体的制药行业背景下,自由放任式领导如何对人才管理产生建设性影响。最后,本研究为制药公司的从业者提供建议,以改进他们在自由放任式领导方面的战略选择,确保更好地实施人才管理策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea5/10361365/90ed2b2740e6/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea5/10361365/ee5cbf7806b4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea5/10361365/90ed2b2740e6/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea5/10361365/ee5cbf7806b4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea5/10361365/90ed2b2740e6/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Role of laissez-faire leadership in talent management: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry of Bangladesh.自由放任式领导在人才管理中的作用:来自孟加拉国制药行业的证据。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 15;9(6):e17234. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17234. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Laissez-Faire Leadership and Affective Commitment: the Roles of Leader-Member Exchange and Subordinate Relational Self-concept.自由放任型领导与情感承诺:领导-成员交换关系和下属关系自我概念的作用。
J Bus Psychol. 2021;36(4):533-551. doi: 10.1007/s10869-020-09700-9. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
3
The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior.自由放任式领导行为的破坏性。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2007 Jan;12(1):80-92. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.80.
4
The dark and bright side of laissez-faire leadership: Does subordinates' goal orientation make a difference?自由放任式领导的阴暗面与光明面:下属的目标导向会产生影响吗?
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 15;14:1077357. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1077357. eCollection 2023.
5
High-Performance Work Practices and Interpersonal Relationships: Leadership as a Risk Factor.高绩效工作实践与人际关系:作为风险因素的领导力
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 29;13:854118. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.854118. eCollection 2022.
6
Impact of Authoritative and Laissez-Faire Leadership on Thriving at Work: The Moderating Role of Conscientiousness.权威型和放任型领导对工作中蓬勃发展的影响:尽责性的调节作用。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Jul 5;11(3):667-685. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11030048.
7
An examination of "nonleadership": from laissez-faire leadership to leader reward omission and punishment omission.对“非领导行为”的审视:从放任型领导到领导者奖励缺失与惩罚缺失
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Nov;93(6):1234-48. doi: 10.1037/a0012875.
8
The Relationship between Laissez-Faire Leadership and Cyberbullying at Work: The Role of Interpersonal Conflicts.放任型领导与工作场所网络欺凌之间的关系:人际冲突的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 16;14(9):824. doi: 10.3390/bs14090824.
9
Development of the Chinese coaches' autonomy-supportive- coaching style scale.中国教练自主支持型教练风格量表的编制
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 22;15:1412240. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1412240. eCollection 2024.
10
Linking Safety-Specific Leader Reward and Punishment Omission to Safety Compliance Behavior: The Role of Distributive Justice and Role Ambiguity.将安全特定领导者奖惩缺失与安全合规行为联系起来:分配公正和角色模糊的作用。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 16;10:841345. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.841345. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Laissez-Faire Leadership and Affective Commitment: the Roles of Leader-Member Exchange and Subordinate Relational Self-concept.自由放任型领导与情感承诺:领导-成员交换关系和下属关系自我概念的作用。
J Bus Psychol. 2021;36(4):533-551. doi: 10.1007/s10869-020-09700-9. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
2
Employee engagement practices during COVID-19 lockdown.新冠疫情封锁期间的员工敬业度实践。
J Public Aff. 2021 Nov;21(4):e2508. doi: 10.1002/pa.2508. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
3
The Influence of Nurse Manager Leadership Style on Staff Nurse Work Engagement.
护士长领导风格对护士工作投入的影响
J Nurs Adm. 2016 Sep;46(9):438-43. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000372.
4
The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior.自由放任式领导行为的破坏性。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2007 Jan;12(1):80-92. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.80.
5
Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity.变革型领导与交易型领导:对其相对有效性的元分析检验
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Oct;89(5):755-68. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755.
6
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
7
Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men.变革型、交易型和放任型领导风格:一项比较男性与女性的元分析
Psychol Bull. 2003 Jul;129(4):569-91. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569.