Nguyen Son D, Biesbroek Sander, Le Tuyen D, Feskens Edith J M, Brouwer Inge D, Talsma Elise F
Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
National Institute of Nutrition, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Front Nutr. 2023 Jul 6;10:986241. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.986241. eCollection 2023.
Improving diet quality while decreasing environmental impacts is an important challenge for a healthy and sustainable food system. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the most common dietary patterns per female household member and explore the diet quality and environmental impacts of these patterns.
The nationally representative General Nutrition Survey of 2009-2010 ( = 8,225 households) was used to derive dietary patterns using principal component analysis (PCA) based on 18 food groups as input variables. Quintiles of the highest adherence (Q5) and lowest adherence (Q1) were generated based on the factor score of each dietary pattern. Nutrient adequacy and dietary diversity scores (DDS) were calculated to measure diet quality, and greenhouse gas emission (GHGE) and blue water use (BWU) were selected as environmental impact indicators.
Using PCA, three distinct dietary patterns were identified: an Omnivorous, Traditional, and Pescatarian pattern. Compared to the Traditional pattern, the Omnivorous and Pescatarian patterns (Q5s) were associated with a higher nutrient adequacy, with mean probability of adequacy of 0.51 in both patterns, compared to 0.45 in the Traditional pattern. However, environmental impacts in terms of GHGE and BWU per 2,000 kcal were considerably higher in the Omnivorous pattern (6.14 kg CO-eq. and 0.15 m/kg) compared to all other pattern's Q5s. The GHGE was lowest in the Traditional pattern (4.18 kg CO-eq.) and the Pescatarian pattern has the lowest BWU (0.12 m/kg).
Despite that diet quality was slightly better in all three patterns compared to the average diet of the total population, environmental impact was also higher. Therefore, future research is needed to develop a more optimal diet that considers both diet quality and environmental impact to explore the trade-offs between diet quality and environmental impact.
在降低环境影响的同时提高饮食质量,是健康且可持续的食物系统面临的一项重大挑战。因此,本研究旨在分析每位女性家庭成员最常见的饮食模式,并探究这些模式的饮食质量及环境影响。
利用具有全国代表性的2009 - 2010年综合营养调查(n = 8225户家庭),以18个食物组作为输入变量,通过主成分分析(PCA)得出饮食模式。根据每种饮食模式的因子得分,生成最高依从性五分位数(Q5)和最低依从性五分位数(Q1)。计算营养充足率和饮食多样性得分(DDS)以衡量饮食质量,并选择温室气体排放(GHGE)和蓝水用量(BWU)作为环境影响指标。
通过主成分分析,确定了三种不同的饮食模式:杂食模式、传统模式和素食模式。与传统模式相比,杂食模式和素食模式(Q5)的营养充足率更高,这两种模式的充足率平均概率均为0.51,而传统模式为0.45。然而,每2000千卡杂食模式的GHGE和BWU环境影响相比所有其他模式的Q5都要高得多(分别为6.14千克二氧化碳当量和0.15立方米/千克)。传统模式的GHGE最低(4.18千克二氧化碳当量),素食模式的BWU最低(0.12立方米/千克)。
尽管这三种模式的饮食质量均略高于总体人群的平均饮食,但环境影响也更高。因此,未来需要开展研究,制定一种同时兼顾饮食质量和环境影响的更优化饮食方案,以探究饮食质量与环境影响之间的权衡取舍。