Division of Digital Healthcare, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Republic of Korea.
Tomography. 2023 Jul 24;9(4):1423-1433. doi: 10.3390/tomography9040113.
Quantitative analysis of intracranial vessel segments typically requires the identification of the vessels' centerlines, and a path-finding algorithm can be used to automatically detect vessel segments' centerlines. This study compared the performance of path-finding algorithms for vessel labeling. Three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) images from the publicly available dataset were considered for this study. After manual annotations of the endpoints of each vessel segment, three path-finding methods were compared: (Method 1) depth-first search algorithm, (Method 2) Dijkstra's algorithm, and (Method 3) A* algorithm. The rate of correctly found paths was quantified and compared among the three methods in each segment of the circle of Willis arteries. In the analysis of 840 vessel segments, Method 2 showed the highest accuracy (97.1%) of correctly found paths, while Method 1 and 3 showed an accuracy of 83.5% and 96.1%, respectively. The AComm artery was highly inaccurately identified in Method 1, with an accuracy of 43.2%. Incorrect paths by Method 2 were noted in the R-ICA, L-ICA, and R-PCA-P1 segments. The Dijkstra and A* algorithms showed similar accuracy in path-finding, and they were comparable in the speed of path-finding in the circle of Willis arterial segments.
颅内血管段的定量分析通常需要识别血管的中心线,而路径查找算法可用于自动检测血管段的中心线。本研究比较了用于血管标记的路径查找算法的性能。这项研究考虑了来自公开数据集的三维(3D)时间飞跃磁共振血管造影(MRA)图像。在对每个血管段的端点进行手动注释后,比较了三种路径查找方法:(方法 1)深度优先搜索算法、(方法 2)Dijkstra 算法和(方法 3)A算法。在 Willis 动脉环的每个血管段中,量化并比较了三种方法正确找到路径的比率。在对 840 个血管段的分析中,方法 2 显示出正确找到路径的最高准确性(97.1%),而方法 1 和 3 的准确性分别为 83.5%和 96.1%。方法 1 对 AComm 动脉的识别准确率非常低,为 43.2%。方法 2 在 R-ICA、L-ICA 和 R-PCA-P1 段中出现错误的路径。Dijkstra 和 A算法在路径查找中的准确性相似,在 Willis 动脉段的路径查找速度上也相当。