Suppr超能文献

更新急诊医学研究重点。

Refreshing the emergency medicine research priorities.

机构信息

Academic Department of Military Emergency Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK

School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2023 Sep;40(9):666-670. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-213019. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The priorities for UK emergency medicine research were defined in 2017 by a priority setting partnership coordinated by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine in collaboration with the James Lind Alliance (JLA). Much has changed in the last 5 years, not least a global infectious disease pandemic and a significant worsening of the crisis in the urgent and emergency care system. Our aim was to review and refresh the emergency medicine research priorities.

METHODS

A steering group including patients, carers and healthcare professionals was established to agree to the methodology of the refresh. An independent adviser from the JLA chaired the steering group. The scope was adult patients in the ED. New questions were invited via an open call using multiple communications methods ensuring that patients, carers and healthcare professionals had the opportunity to contribute. Questions underwent minisystematic (BestBETs) review to determine if the question had been answered, and the original 2017 priorities were reviewed. Any questions that remained unanswered were included in an interim prioritisation survey, which was distributed to patients, carers and healthcare professionals. Rankings from this survey were reviewed by the steering group and a shortlist of questions put forward to the final workshop, which was held to discuss and rank the research questions in order of priority.

RESULTS

77 new questions were submitted, of which 58 underwent mini-systematic review. After this process, 49 questions (of which 32 were new, 11 were related to original priorities and 6 unanswered original priorities were carried forward) were reviewed by the steering group and included in an interim prioritisation survey. The interim prioritisation survey attracted 276 individual responses. 26 questions were shortlisted for discussion at the final prioritisation workshop, where the top 10 research priorities were agreed.

CONCLUSION

We have redefined the priorities for emergency medicine research in the UK using robust and established methodology, which will inform the agenda for the coming years.

摘要

背景

2017 年,由英国皇家急诊医学院与詹姆斯林德联盟(JLA)合作协调的一个优先事项设定伙伴关系确定了英国急诊医学研究的优先事项。在过去的 5 年中,情况发生了很大变化,不仅发生了全球传染病大流行,而且紧急和急救护理系统的危机也显著恶化。我们的目的是审查和更新急诊医学研究重点。

方法

成立了一个包括患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员在内的指导小组,以同意刷新方法。JLA 的一位独立顾问担任指导小组主席。范围包括急诊科的成年患者。通过多种沟通方式公开呼吁邀请新问题,确保患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员有机会做出贡献。问题经过最小系统(最佳 BETs)审查,以确定该问题是否已得到回答,并审查了 2017 年的原始优先事项。任何未得到解答的问题都包含在临时优先排序调查中,并分发给患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员。指导小组审查了该调查的排名,并向最终研讨会提交了一个问题清单,该研讨会旨在讨论和按优先顺序对研究问题进行排名。

结果

提交了 77 个新问题,其中 58 个经过了 mini 系统审查。经过这一过程,49 个问题(其中 32 个是新问题,11 个与原始重点相关,6 个未回答的原始重点被保留)由指导小组审查并纳入临时优先排序调查。临时优先排序调查吸引了 276 条个人回复。26 个问题被列入最终优先级研讨会的讨论名单,会上确定了前 10 项研究重点。

结论

我们使用可靠和成熟的方法重新定义了英国急诊医学研究的重点,这将为未来几年的议程提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d769/10447359/019f56d26668/emermed-2022-213019f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验