Panazzolo Giovanni Kalempa, Kmetiuk Louise Bach, Domingues Orlei José, Farinhas João Henrique, Doline Fernando Rodrigo, França Danilo Alves de, Rodrigues Nássarah Jabur Lot, Biondo Leandro Meneguelli, Giuffrida Rogério, Langoni Helio, Santarém Vamilton Alvares, Biondo Alexander Welker, Fávero Giovani Marino
Graduate College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa 84030-900, PR, Brazil.
Graduate College of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 81530-000, PR, Brazil.
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023 Jul 24;8(7):377. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8070377.
Brazilian are rural semi-isolated remnant communities of former black slaves and their descendants who traditionally maintained themselves through archaic subsistence livestock and agriculture practices and historically lacked specific public health policies. Although such individuals and their dogs may be exposed to zoonotic pathogens such as , no study to date has assessed these human-animal populations together. Populations in four different Brazilian in southern Brazil were evaluated. Overall, 93/208 people (44.7%) and 63/100 dogs (63.0%) were seropositive for IgG anti- antibodies by indirect immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT), 4/208 (1.9%) human samples seropositive for IgM anti- antibodies, with a human-dog seropositivity ratio for IgG of 0.71. individuals ingesting game meat were 2.43-fold more likely (95% CI: 1.05-5.9) to be seropositive. No risk factors were associated with seropositivity among dogs, thus suggesting that their exposure to was random. Surprisingly, our research group had previously found an inverted human-dog ratio for seropositivity of 2.54 in the urban area of a nearby major city. Because consumption of raw/undercooked game meat by individuals may have contributed to higher exposure, higher overall seroprevalence among dogs may have also indicated interaction with wildlife. Although these dogs may hunt wildlife without their owners' awareness, the higher dog seropositivity may also be related to feeding from discarded food in the community or backyard livestock animals and drinking surface water contaminated with oocysts. Thus, wildlife cannot be singled out as the reason, and future studies should consider sampling water, soil, wildlife, and livestock tissues, to fully establish the source of infection in dogs herein.
巴西的[群体名称未明确]是前黑奴及其后代组成的农村半孤立残余社区,他们传统上通过古老的自给性畜牧和农业方式维持生计,历史上缺乏特定的公共卫生政策。尽管这些人和他们的狗可能接触到诸如[病原体名称未明确]等人畜共患病原体,但迄今为止尚无研究对这些人与动物群体进行综合评估。对巴西南部四个不同的巴西[群体名称未明确]群体进行了评估。总体而言,通过间接免疫荧光抗体试验(IFAT),93/208人(44.7%)和63/100只狗(63.0%)抗[抗体名称未明确]IgG呈血清阳性,4/208份人类样本抗[抗体名称未明确]IgM呈血清阳性,人与狗的IgG血清阳性率为0.71。食用野味的[群体名称未明确]个体血清阳性的可能性高2.43倍(95%可信区间:1.05 - 5.9)。狗的血清阳性与任何危险因素均无关联,这表明它们接触[病原体名称未明确]是随机的。令人惊讶的是,我们的研究小组此前在附近一个大城市的市区发现人与狗的[病原体名称未明确]血清阳性率之比为2.54,呈倒置状态。由于[群体名称未明确]个体食用生的/未煮熟的野味可能导致更高的暴露风险,狗的总体血清阳性率较高也可能表明它们与野生动物有相互作用。尽管这些狗可能在主人不知情的情况下捕食野生动物,但狗的血清阳性率较高也可能与食用社区丢弃的食物、后院家畜或饮用被卵囊污染的地表水有关。因此,不能将野生动物单独作为原因,未来的研究应考虑对水、土壤、野生动物和家畜组织进行采样,以全面确定本文中狗的感染源。