Suppr超能文献

欧洲痴呆症患者病例系列中Cohen-Mansfield激越量表(CMAI)的验证性和探索性因素分析:RECage研究结果

A Confirmatory and an Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) in a European Case Series of Patients with Dementia: Results from the RECage Study.

作者信息

Cesana Bruno Mario, Poptsi Eleni, Tsolaki Magda, Bergh Sverre, Ciccone Alfonso, Cognat Emmanuel, Fabbo Andrea, Fascendini Sara, Frisoni Giovanni B, Frölich Lutz, Jori Maria Cristina, Mecocci Patrizia, Merlo Paola, Peters Oliver, Defanti Carlo Alberto

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Unit of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Bioinformatics "Giulio A. Maccacaro" Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.

Laboratory of Psychology, Section of Cognitive and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, School of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTh), 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2023 Jul 3;13(7):1025. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13071025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

One of the most widely used instruments for assessing agitation in dementia patients is the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), nevertheless no global score has been proposed. The aim of this study is: (a) to conduct a confirmatory (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of CMAI on people with dementia and Psychological and Behavioral Symptoms (BPSD), and (b) to propose an alternative structure, based on clinical criteria including all CMAI items.

METHODS

Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses were carried out on the CMAI 29 items administered at baseline to 505 patients with dementia (PwD) and BPSD enrolled in the international observational RECage study.

RESULTS

The three-factor structure has not been confirmed by the CFA, whilst the EFA was carried out respectively on 25 items disregarding 4 items with a prevalence ≤5% and then on 20 items disregarding 9 items with a prevalence ≤10%. The four-factor structure explaining 56% of the variance comprised Physically Aggressive behavior, Verbally Aggressive behavior, Physically non-aggressive behavior, and Physically and verbally aggressive behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

A new grouping of all items according to a clinical criterion is proposed, allowing for a more sensible evaluation of the symptoms leading to better differentiation.

摘要

背景

用于评估痴呆患者激越症状的最广泛使用的工具之一是科恩-曼斯菲尔德激越量表(CMAI),然而尚未提出总体评分。本研究的目的是:(a)对患有痴呆症和心理与行为症状(BPSD)的人群进行CMAI的验证性因素分析(CFA)和探索性因素分析(EFA),以及(b)基于包括所有CMAI项目的临床标准提出一种替代结构。

方法

对国际观察性RECage研究中纳入的505例患有痴呆症(PwD)和BPSD的患者在基线时给予的CMAI的29个项目进行了验证性和探索性因素分析。

结果

CFA未证实三因素结构,而EFA分别对25个项目进行了分析(不考虑患病率≤5%的4个项目),然后对20个项目进行了分析(不考虑患病率≤10%的9个项目)。解释56%方差的四因素结构包括身体攻击性行为、言语攻击性行为、非身体攻击性行为以及身体和言语攻击性行为。

结论

根据临床标准对所有项目提出了一种新的分组方式,从而能够对症状进行更合理的评估,实现更好的区分。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验