Suppr超能文献

生物活性玻璃治疗牙本质过敏症的评估:一项系统综述

Evaluation of Bioactive Glass Treatment for Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Petrović Dorotea, Galić Dora, Seifert Davor, Lešić Nikolina, Smolić Martina

机构信息

Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia.

Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia.

出版信息

Biomedicines. 2023 Jul 14;11(7):1992. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11071992.

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review is to compare home and office desensitizers containing bioactive glass with control groups in randomized controlled trials (RCT) conducted between 2018 and 2022. According to PRISMA guidelines, three electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Library) were searched for published scientific articles in October 2022. RCT with adult participants with dentin hypersensitivity (DH) diagnosed by evaporative, mechanical, or thermal stimulation, with a follow-up period and quantified pain assessment were included in the study. Studies that reported DH due to tooth restoration, crown preparation, bleaching, or periodontal surgery or used bioactive glass-ceramics were excluded. The quality of the studies was assessed using version 2 of the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for randomized studies (RoB 2 tool). Articles that were duplicative or unrelated to this study were excluded. Nine articles were selected for full-text evaluation, whereas two articles were rejected. The remaining seven reports were included in this review. The calcium sodium phosphosilicate group (CSPS) was not significantly different from the positive control groups. Compared with the control groups, fluoro calcium phosphosilicate (FCPS) may be the most effective long-term treatment option. In terms of DH symptom reduction, the FCPS group performed better than the CSPS group. CSPS at a concentration of 5-15% and FCPS at a concentration of 5% are effective in treating DH in adult participants.

摘要

本系统评价的目的是在2018年至2022年期间进行的随机对照试验(RCT)中,比较含生物活性玻璃的家用和办公室脱敏剂与对照组。根据PRISMA指南,2022年10月检索了三个电子数据库(Scopus、PubMed和Cochrane图书馆)以查找已发表的科学文章。纳入研究的RCT参与者为经蒸发、机械或热刺激诊断为牙本质过敏(DH)的成年人,有随访期且疼痛评估进行了量化。排除报告因牙齿修复、牙冠制备、漂白或牙周手术导致的DH或使用生物活性玻璃陶瓷的研究。使用Cochrane随机研究偏倚风险工具第2版(RoB 2工具)评估研究质量。排除重复或与本研究无关的文章。选择9篇文章进行全文评估,而2篇文章被拒绝。其余7篇报告纳入本综述。磷酸硅钙钠组(CSPS)与阳性对照组无显著差异。与对照组相比,氟磷酸硅钙(FCPS)可能是最有效的长期治疗选择。在减轻DH症状方面,FCPS组比CSPS组表现更好。浓度为5-15% 的CSPS和浓度为5% 的FCPS对治疗成年参与者的DH有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b22c/10377612/86dbb28dc30a/biomedicines-11-01992-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验