• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

既往腰椎手术会降低背根神经节脉冲射频治疗对慢性腰骶部神经根性疼痛患者的疗效。

Previous Lumbar Spine Surgery Decreases the Therapeutic Efficacy of Dorsal Root Ganglion Pulsed Radiofrequency in Patients with Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain.

作者信息

Jandura Jiri, Vajda Milan, Kostysyn Roman, Vanasek Jiri, Cermakova Eva, Zizka Jan, Ryska Pavel

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolska 581, 50005 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Simkova 870, 50003 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 27;13(7):1054. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071054.

DOI:10.3390/jpm13071054
PMID:37511667
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10381565/
Abstract

Chronic lumbosacral radicular pain (CLRP) as a possible adverse consequence of lumbar spine surgery represents a serious medical challenge. Pulsed radiofrequency of dorsal root ganglion (PRF-DRG) treatment is known to be effective in alleviating CLRP. This retrospective study compares the efficacy of a single CT-guided PRF-DRG procedure in the treatment of unilateral CLRP between patients without (non-PSS) and with (PSS) previous lumbar spine surgery. Non-PSS and PSS groups included 30 and 20 patients, respectively. Outcomes (pain intensity and disability) were evaluated by means of the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) immediately after the procedure (VAS), as well as three and six months after the procedure, respectively. Non-PSS group showed a significant ( ˂ 0.001) decrease of VAS (median) at all follow-up intervals (from 6 to 4; 4; 4.5 points, respectively). The PSS group showed a significant yet transient VAS (median) decrease (from 6 to 5 points) immediately after the procedure only ( < 0.001). The decrease of VAS was more pronounced in the non-PSS group after three and six months ( = 0.0054 and 0.011, respectively) in intergroup comparison. A relative decrease of VAS ≥ 50% during follow-up was achieved in 40%; 43.3%; 26.7% (non-PSS), and 25%; 5%; 0% (PSS) of patients. ODI (median) significantly decreased in the non-PSS group (from 21.5 to 18 points) at three and six months ( = 0.014 and 0.021, respectively). In conclusion, previous lumbar spine surgery decreases the therapeutic efficacy of PRF-DRG procedure in CLRP patients.

摘要

慢性腰骶部神经根性疼痛(CLRP)作为腰椎手术可能的不良后果,是一项严峻的医学挑战。已知背根神经节脉冲射频(PRF-DRG)治疗在缓解CLRP方面有效。本回顾性研究比较了在无(非PSS)和有(PSS)既往腰椎手术史的患者中,单次CT引导下PRF-DRG手术治疗单侧CLRP的疗效。非PSS组和PSS组分别纳入30例和20例患者。分别在术后即刻(VAS)以及术后3个月和6个月,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评估结果(疼痛强度和功能障碍)。非PSS组在所有随访间隔时VAS(中位数)均显著降低(˂0.001)(分别从6分降至4分、4分、4.5分)。PSS组仅在术后即刻VAS(中位数)有显著但短暂的降低(从6分降至5分)(˂0.001)。组间比较时,术后3个月和6个月非PSS组VAS降低更明显(分别为=0.0054和0.011)。随访期间VAS相对降低≥50%的患者比例在非PSS组为40%、43.3%、26.7%,在PSS组为25%、5%、0%。非PSS组在术后3个月和6个月时ODI(中位数)显著降低(分别从21.5降至18分)(分别为=0.014和0.021)。总之,既往腰椎手术会降低PRF-DRG手术对CLRP患者的治疗效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0572/10381565/8351f129816b/jpm-13-01054-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0572/10381565/f38f750d0579/jpm-13-01054-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0572/10381565/0cea568b835d/jpm-13-01054-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0572/10381565/2bfac4694a36/jpm-13-01054-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0572/10381565/882de8a7025a/jpm-13-01054-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0572/10381565/8351f129816b/jpm-13-01054-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0572/10381565/f38f750d0579/jpm-13-01054-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0572/10381565/0cea568b835d/jpm-13-01054-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0572/10381565/2bfac4694a36/jpm-13-01054-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0572/10381565/882de8a7025a/jpm-13-01054-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0572/10381565/8351f129816b/jpm-13-01054-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Previous Lumbar Spine Surgery Decreases the Therapeutic Efficacy of Dorsal Root Ganglion Pulsed Radiofrequency in Patients with Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain.既往腰椎手术会降低背根神经节脉冲射频治疗对慢性腰骶部神经根性疼痛患者的疗效。
J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 27;13(7):1054. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071054.
2
A real-world evidence of a consecutive treatment of 42 spine-related pain using dorsal root ganglion-pulsed radiofrequency (DRG-PRF).一项使用背根神经节脉冲射频(DRG-PRF)连续治疗 42 例脊柱相关疼痛的真实世界证据。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Oct;197:106186. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106186. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
3
Pulsed radiofrequency treatment of the lumbar dorsal root ganglion in patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study.脉冲射频治疗慢性腰椎根性疼痛患者的腰椎背根神经节:一项随机、安慰剂对照的初步研究。
J Pain Res. 2014 Jan 10;7:47-55. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S55749.
4
Transforaminal Steroid Injection After Dorsal Root Ganglion Pulsed Radiofrequency (DRG-PRF): Impact on Pain Intensity and Disability.背根神经节脉冲射频(DRG-PRF)后经椎间孔类固醇注射:对疼痛强度和功能障碍的影响。
Pain Ther. 2024 Oct;13(5):1271-1285. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00639-w. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
5
The Effect of Bipolar Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment on Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Refractory to Monopolar Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment.双极脉冲射频治疗对经单极脉冲射频治疗无效的慢性腰骶神经根性疼痛的疗效。
Pain Physician. 2018 Mar;21(2):E97-E103.
6
Chronic intractable lumbosacral radicular pain, is there a remedy? Pulsed radiofrequency treatment and volumetric modifications of the lumbar dorsal root ganglia.慢性难治性腰骶神经根痛,有治疗方法吗?脉冲射频治疗和腰椎背根神经节容积改建。
Radiol Med. 2021 Jan;126(1):124-132. doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01212-z. Epub 2020 May 4.
7
Retrospective review of the efficacy and safety of repeated pulsed and continuous radiofrequency lesioning of the dorsal root ganglion/segmental nerve for lumbar radicular pain.回顾性分析背根神经节/节段性神经重复脉冲射频与连续射频热凝治疗腰椎根性疼痛的疗效和安全性。
Pain Physician. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(4):371-6.
8
Comparison of Pulsed Radiofrequency, Oxygen-Ozone Therapy and Epidural Steroid Injections for the Treatment of Chronic Unilateral Radicular Syndrome.脉冲射频、臭氧治疗与硬膜外类固醇注射治疗单侧慢性根性综合征的比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Feb 4;57(2):136. doi: 10.3390/medicina57020136.
9
Pulsed radiofrequency of lumbar dorsal root ganglion for lumbar radicular pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.脉冲射频术治疗腰椎神经根痛:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Pract. 2024 Jun;24(5):772-785. doi: 10.1111/papr.13351. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
10
Predictive Factors for Successful Outcome of Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment in Patients with Intractable Lumbosacral Radicular Pain.顽固性腰骶部神经根性疼痛患者脉冲射频治疗成功结局的预测因素
Pain Med. 2016 Jul;17(7):1233-1240. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnv052. Epub 2016 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency stimulation in patients with chronic pain: a narrative review.脉冲射频刺激对慢性疼痛患者的疗效:一项叙述性综述。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 12;6:1544909. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1544909. eCollection 2025.
2
Transforaminal Steroid Injection After Dorsal Root Ganglion Pulsed Radiofrequency (DRG-PRF): Impact on Pain Intensity and Disability.背根神经节脉冲射频(DRG-PRF)后经椎间孔类固醇注射:对疼痛强度和功能障碍的影响。
Pain Ther. 2024 Oct;13(5):1271-1285. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00639-w. Epub 2024 Jul 28.

本文引用的文献

1
The mechanism of action of pulsed radiofrequency in reducing pain: a narrative review.脉冲射频减轻疼痛的作用机制:一项叙述性综述。
J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2022 Jul;39(3):200-205. doi: 10.12701/jyms.2022.00101. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
2
Efficacy of Radiofrequency as Therapy and Diagnostic Support in the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.射频在肌肉骨骼疼痛管理中的治疗及诊断支持疗效:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 26;12(3):600. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030600.
3
Clinical Outcome of Pulsed-Radiofrequency Combined With Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Caused by Distinct Etiology.
脉冲射频联合经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射治疗不同病因所致腰骶部神经根性疼痛的临床疗效
Front Neurosci. 2021 Jul 28;15:683298. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.683298. eCollection 2021.
4
Comparison of Pulsed Radiofrequency, Oxygen-Ozone Therapy and Epidural Steroid Injections for the Treatment of Chronic Unilateral Radicular Syndrome.脉冲射频、臭氧治疗与硬膜外类固醇注射治疗单侧慢性根性综合征的比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Feb 4;57(2):136. doi: 10.3390/medicina57020136.
5
Postsurgical Spine: Techniques, Expected Imaging Findings, and Complications.术后脊柱:技术、预期影像学表现及并发症
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018 Dec;39(6):630-650. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2018.10.017. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
6
Predictors of the analgesic efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency treatment in patients with chronic lumbosacral radicular pain: a retrospective observational study.慢性腰骶部神经根性疼痛患者脉冲射频治疗镇痛效果的预测因素:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Pain Res. 2018 Jun 26;11:1223-1230. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S164414. eCollection 2018.
7
Efficacy of Pulsed Radiofrequency Stimulation in Patients with Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Narrative Review.脉冲射频刺激治疗周围神经性疼痛的疗效:一项叙述性综述。
Pain Physician. 2018 May;21(3):E225-E234.
8
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Review Article.腰椎手术失败综合征:一篇综述文章。
Asian Spine J. 2018 Apr;12(2):372-379. doi: 10.4184/asj.2018.12.2.372. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
9
The Effect of Bipolar Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment on Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Refractory to Monopolar Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment.双极脉冲射频治疗对经单极脉冲射频治疗无效的慢性腰骶神经根性疼痛的疗效。
Pain Physician. 2018 Mar;21(2):E97-E103.
10
Lumbar Dorsal Root Ganglion Block as a Prognostic Tool Before Pulsed Radiofrequency: A Randomized, Prospective, and Comparative Study on Cost-Effectiveness.腰椎背根神经节阻滞作为脉冲射频治疗前的预后评估工具:一项关于成本效益的随机、前瞻性对照研究
World Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;112:e157-e164. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.183. Epub 2018 Jan 6.