Suppr超能文献

迈向对疫苗犹豫更具批判性的公共卫生理解:十年研究的关键见解

Towards a More Critical Public Health Understanding of Vaccine Hesitancy: Key Insights from a Decade of Research.

作者信息

Cooper Sara, Wiysonge Charles S

机构信息

Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town 7505, South Africa.

School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7935, South Africa.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jun 26;11(7):1155. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11071155.

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy has gained renewed attention as an important public health concern worldwide. Against this backdrop, over the last decade, we have conducted various qualitative, social science studies with the broad shared aim of better understanding this complex phenomenon. This has included various Cochrane systematic reviews of qualitative research globally, systematic reviews of qualitative research in Africa, and primary research studies in South Africa. These studies have also explored vaccine hesitancy for various vaccines, including routine childhood vaccination, HPV vaccination and other routine vaccinations for adolescents, and, most recently, COVID-19 vaccination. In this reflective and critical commentary piece we reflect on seven key overarching insights we feel we have gained about this complex phenomenon from the varying studies we have conducted over the past decade. These insights comprise the following: (1) the relationship between vaccine knowledge and hesitancy is complex and may operate in multiple directions; (2) vaccine hesitancy is driven by multiple socio-political forces; (3) vaccine hesitancy may be many things, rather than a single phenomenon; (4) vaccine hesitancy may be an ongoing 'process', rather than a fixed 'stance'; (5) vaccine hesitancy may sometimes be about a 'striving', rather than a 'resisting'; (6) 'distrust' as a driver of vaccine hesitancy needs to be better contextualized and disaggregated; and (7) the 'demand-side' versus 'supply/access-side' distinction of the drivers of suboptimal vaccination may be misleading and unhelpful. In unpacking these insights, we problematize some of the common assumptions within the vaccine hesitancy literature and flag topics that we think could benefit from further scrutiny and debate. Our hope is that this can provide a platform for further engagement on these issues and ultimately contribute towards fostering a more critical public health understanding of vaccine hesitancy.

摘要

疫苗犹豫作为一个重要的全球公共卫生问题,再次受到关注。在此背景下,在过去十年中,我们开展了各种定性的社会科学研究,其广泛的共同目标是更好地理解这一复杂现象。这包括对全球定性研究的各种Cochrane系统评价、对非洲定性研究的系统评价以及在南非开展的初级研究。这些研究还探讨了对各种疫苗的犹豫情况,包括儿童常规疫苗接种、人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种以及青少年的其他常规疫苗接种,最近还包括新冠疫苗接种。在这篇反思性和批判性的评论文章中,我们反思了我们认为从过去十年开展的不同研究中对这一复杂现象所获得的七个关键总体见解。这些见解包括:(1)疫苗知识与犹豫之间的关系是复杂的,可能以多种方式起作用;(2)疫苗犹豫受到多种社会政治力量的驱动;(3)疫苗犹豫可能有多种表现,而不是单一现象;(4)疫苗犹豫可能是一个持续的“过程”,而不是一种固定的“立场”;(5)疫苗犹豫有时可能是关于“努力争取”,而不是“抵制”;(6)作为疫苗犹豫驱动因素的“不信任”需要更好地结合背景进行分析和细分;(7)疫苗接种率不理想的驱动因素在“需求方”与“供应/获取方”之间的区分可能具有误导性且毫无帮助。在剖析这些见解时,我们对疫苗犹豫文献中的一些常见假设提出质疑,并指出我们认为可能受益于进一步审视和辩论的话题。我们希望这可以为就这些问题进行进一步探讨提供一个平台,并最终有助于促进对疫苗犹豫形成更具批判性的公共卫生理解。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
The Vaccine-Hesitant Moment.对疫苗犹豫不决的时刻。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 7;387(1):58-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2106441. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
5
Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.理解对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度。
Nat Med. 2021 Aug;27(8):1338-1339. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01459-7.
8
Trust in science, social consensus and vaccine confidence.信任科学、社会共识和疫苗信心。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Nov;5(11):1528-1534. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01115-7. Epub 2021 May 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验