Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Araranguá, Brazil.
Glob Public Health. 2022 Jun;17(6):1087-1098. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1912138. Epub 2021 Apr 11.
The complex phenomenon of vaccine hesitancy has been causing increasing global concern. This systematic review aims at analysing the state of art of scientific literature concerning vaccine hesitancy in Latin America and Africa, observing if: (i) they use the same research trends as the global North; and (ii) the parameters recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and taken from the experience of the global North are adequate to the Global South's context. This review analyses empirical, qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-study publications, from 2015 to 2020, available at five different databases. The studies produced in the Global South bring up important context-specific issues, such as issues of access (that are not included in the WHO's definition of vaccine hesitancy), cultural and religious issues, reactions to governments, reactions to recent episodes of vaccine tests on populations, and reactions to past of colonial violence. Initiatives to understand the phenomenon based on methodological and conceptual frameworks from the global North alone can cause wrongful conclusions.
疫苗犹豫这一复杂现象引起了全球越来越多的关注。本系统综述旨在分析 2015 年至 2020 年间,拉丁美洲和非洲有关疫苗犹豫的科学文献现状,观察这些文献是否:(i) 使用与全球北方相同的研究趋势;以及 (ii) 世界卫生组织 (WHO) 采用的、源自全球北方经验的参数是否适用于全球南方的情况。本综述分析了来自五个不同数据库的实证性、定性、定量或混合研究出版物。在全球南方开展的研究提出了一些重要的具体国情问题,如获取方面的问题(这些问题未包含在世卫组织对疫苗犹豫的定义中)、文化和宗教问题、对政府的反应、对近期在人群中进行疫苗试验的反应,以及对过去殖民暴力的反应。仅仅基于来自全球北方的方法学和概念框架来理解这一现象,可能会导致得出错误的结论。