Department of Orthopedics, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Orthop Surg. 2023 Sep;15(9):2373-2382. doi: 10.1111/os.13818. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
The high hip center (HHC) technique has been proposed for the treatment of patients with developmental dysplaisa of the hip (DDH) who have an acetabular bone defect. However, the importance of global femoral offset (FO) in the application of this technique has not been sufficiently appreciated. Our goals were to confirm that the HHC technique is feasible in the treatment of patients with DDH and to assess the function of global FO in this procedure.
We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty using high hip center technique for unilateral DDH at our hospital between January 2014 and June 2019. According to global FO, the patients were split into three groups: increased FO group (increment greater than 5 mm), restored FO group (restoration within 5 mm) and decreased FO group (reduction greater than 5 mm). Patients' medical records and plain radiographs were reviewed. One-way ANOVA was used to compare radiographic outcomes and Harris hip score (HHS). Paired t-test was used to assess preoperative and postoperative HHS and leg length discrepancy. Trochanteric pain syndrome, Trendelenburg sign and postoperative limp was evaluated with Fisher's exact test.
The average follow-up time was 7.5 ± 1.4 years. The patients' HHS and leg length discrepancy were significantly improved (p < 0.05). In terms of vertical acetabular height, abductor arm, postoperative leg length difference, and acetabular cup inclination, there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups. At the last follow-up, HHS was significantly higher in the restored FO group than in the decreased FO and increased FO groups. Trochanteric pain syndrome occurred in 15.0% and Trendelenburg sign and postoperative limp in 8.2% of all patients, respectively. Trochanteric pain syndrome, Trendelenburg sign and postoperative limp did not differ significantly across the three groups. One patient in increased FO group underwent revision for dislocation 6 years after surgery.
The HHC technique is an alternative technique for total hip arthroplasty in patients with acetabular bone abnormalities, according to the results of the mid-term follow-up. Also, controlling the correction of the global femoral offset to within 5 mm may lead to better clinical outcomes.
高髋中心(HHC)技术已被提出用于治疗髋臼骨缺损的发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)患者。然而,在应用该技术时,整体股骨偏移(FO)的重要性尚未得到充分重视。我们的目标是证实 HHC 技术在治疗 DDH 患者中的可行性,并评估该技术中整体 FO 的作用。
我们回顾性分析了 2014 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月期间在我院接受单侧 DDH 全髋关节置换术的 73 例患者,均采用高髋中心技术。根据整体 FO,将患者分为三组:增加 FO 组(增加大于 5mm)、恢复 FO 组(恢复在 5mm 内)和减少 FO 组(减少大于 5mm)。回顾患者病历和骨盆正位片。采用单因素方差分析比较影像学结果和 Harris 髋关节评分(HHS)。配对 t 检验用于评估术前和术后 HHS 和下肢长度差异。采用 Fisher 确切检验评估转子间痛综合征、Trendelenburg 征和术后跛行。
平均随访时间为 7.5±1.4 年。患者的 HHS 和下肢长度差异均有显著改善(p<0.05)。在垂直髋臼高度、外展肌臂、术后下肢长度差异和髋臼杯倾斜度方面,三组之间无统计学差异。末次随访时,恢复 FO 组的 HHS 明显高于减少 FO 组和增加 FO 组。转子间痛综合征发生率为 15.0%,Trendelenburg 征和术后跛行发生率分别为 8.2%。三组间转子间痛综合征、Trendelenburg 征和术后跛行发生率无显著差异。增加 FO 组有 1 例患者术后 6 年因脱位行翻修手术。
根据中期随访结果,HHC 技术是髋臼骨异常患者全髋关节置换术的一种替代技术。另外,将整体股骨偏移的纠正控制在 5mm 以内可能会带来更好的临床结果。