• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于网络的、运用层次分析法进行群体决策的软件。

A web-based software for group decision with analytic hierarchy process.

作者信息

Françozo Rafael Verão, Junior Luiz Sérgio Velasquez Urquiza, Carrapateira Elana Souza, Pacheco Bruna Cristine Scarduelli, Oliveira Márcio Teixeira, Torsoni Guilherme Botega, Yari Jiyan

机构信息

Federal Institute of Education Science and Technology of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.

University of Araraquara, Brazil.

出版信息

MethodsX. 2023 Jun 30;11:102277. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102277. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2023.102277
PMID:37519948
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10372897/
Abstract

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a multi-criteria decision support method and is widely applied in many areas. The original AHP method proposed by Thomas L. Saaty in the 1970s requires (n²-n)/2 comparisons. The number of required comparisons can make using this method challenging for maintaining consistent judgments in problems involving many criteria and/or alternatives. Furthermore, the available software is platform-dependent and generally does not support group decision-making. In this paper, we present software for AHP that demands n-1 comparisons. Additionally, the software supports group decision-making using individual aggregation of priorities with arithmetic and geometric means. The system is available at http://ahpweb.net/ and is accessible from any internet-connected device. It currently has more than 100 users and dozens of decision problems in various areas.•The original AHP formulation requires (n²-n)/2 comparisons per cluster which makes it difficult to make consistent judgments.•AHP avaliable software does not enable group decision making.•The proposed system AHP-WEB fills these gaps. The method demands n-1 comparisons per cluster without any inconsistency and allows group decision making on a web system.

摘要

层次分析法（AHP）是一种多准则决策支持方法，在许多领域都有广泛应用。托马斯·L·萨蒂于20世纪70年代提出的原始AHP方法需要(n² - n)/2次比较。所需比较的数量使得在涉及许多准则和/或备选方案的问题中使用该方法难以保持一致的判断。此外，现有的软件依赖于平台，并且通常不支持群体决策。在本文中，我们提出了一种用于AHP的软件，该软件只需要n - 1次比较。此外，该软件支持使用算术平均值和几何平均值对优先级进行个体汇总的群体决策。该系统可在http://ahpweb.net/获取，并且可以从任何连接互联网的设备访问。它目前有100多名用户，涉及各个领域的数十个决策问题。

•原始的AHP公式每个聚类需要(n² - n)/2次比较，这使得做出一致的判断变得困难。

•现有的AHP软件不支持群体决策。

•所提出的AHP-WEB系统填补了这些空白。该方法每个聚类只需要n - 1次比较，不会产生任何不一致性，并且允许在网络系统上进行群体决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/629b88c72051/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/0a9377cf0df1/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/654bc89e8e10/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/5ee6321e31b4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/f34036933f35/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/3c60b85b9674/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/3f9b55839aeb/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/fd0a1bac2118/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/006ddd3e7d61/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/8290acd9cfaa/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/b7560cfa92e3/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/ac417923cf3e/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/629b88c72051/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/0a9377cf0df1/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/654bc89e8e10/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/5ee6321e31b4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/f34036933f35/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/3c60b85b9674/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/3f9b55839aeb/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/fd0a1bac2118/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/006ddd3e7d61/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/8290acd9cfaa/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/b7560cfa92e3/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/ac417923cf3e/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4294/10372897/629b88c72051/gr11.jpg

相似文献

1
A web-based software for group decision with analytic hierarchy process.一种基于网络的、运用层次分析法进行群体决策的软件。
MethodsX. 2023 Jun 30;11:102277. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102277. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
AHP-express: A simplified version of the analytical hierarchy process method.AHP-express：层次分析法的简化版本。
MethodsX. 2019 Dec 4;7:100748. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.11.021. eCollection 2020.
3
Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process in healthcare research: A systematic literature review and evaluation of reporting.层次分析法在医疗保健研究中的应用：系统文献综述与报告评估
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Dec 24;15:112. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0234-7.
4
Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection.一种用于ETL软件选择的集成多准则决策AHP-TOPSIS方法的应用。
Springerplus. 2016 Mar 2;5:263. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1888-z. eCollection 2016.
5
Sequential decision tree using the analytic hierarchy process for decision support in rectal cancer.使用层次分析法的序贯决策树在直肠癌决策支持中的应用。
Artif Intell Med. 2012 Sep;56(1):59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
6
Comparison of different approaches applied in Analytic Hierarchy Process - an example of information needs of patients with rare diseases.层次分析法中不同方法的比较——以罕见病患者的信息需求为例
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Sep 9;16(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0346-8.
7
Simulation Research on the Relationship between Selected Inconsistency Indices Used in AHP.层次分析法中所选不一致性指标之间关系的仿真研究
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Oct 19;25(10):1464. doi: 10.3390/e25101464.
8
Group decision making with the analytic hierarchy process in benefit-risk assessment: a tutorial.基于层次分析法的群体决策在效益-风险评估中的应用：教程
Patient. 2014;7(2):129-40. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0050-7.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区，服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中，叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Systematic assessment of benefits and risks: study protocol for a multi-criteria decision analysis using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for comparative effectiveness research.效益与风险的系统评估：使用层次分析法进行多标准决策分析以开展比较效果研究的研究方案
F1000Res. 2013 Jul 24;2:160. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-160.v1. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing consistency of AHP-based expert judgements: A new approach and its implementation in an interactive tool.提高基于层次分析法的专家判断的一致性：一种新方法及其在交互式工具中的实现。
MethodsX. 2025 May 1;14:103341. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2025.103341. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
A dataset on the segregation of students with disabilities in Brazil.巴西残疾学生隔离情况的数据集。
Data Brief. 2024 Sep 28;57:110972. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110972. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Geospatial approach to pluvial flood-risk and vulnerability assessment in Sunyani Municipality.

本文引用的文献

1
AHP-express: A simplified version of the analytical hierarchy process method.AHP-express：层次分析法的简化版本。
MethodsX. 2019 Dec 4;7:100748. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.11.021. eCollection 2020.
2
Transitivity of preferences.偏好的传递性。
Psychol Rev. 2011 Jan;118(1):42-56. doi: 10.1037/a0021150.
3
A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment.关于层次分析法在环境影响评价中的应用说明。
加纳库马西市雨洪风险与脆弱性评估的地理空间方法
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 18;10(18):e38013. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38013. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
J Environ Manage. 2001 Sep;63(1):27-35. doi: 10.1006/jema.2001.0455.