• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用比值比回归模型评估病例对照研究中的家族聚集性。

Application of odds ratio regression models for assessing familial aggregation from case-control studies.

作者信息

Liang K Y, Beaty T H, Cohen B H

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Oct;124(4):678-83. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114441.

DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114441
PMID:3752061
Abstract

A regression model for estimating covariate effects on odds ratios to test for familial aggregation of common disease in first-degree relatives of cases and controls is presented and illustrated by using family data from a study of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These estimators are in essence an extension of the Mantel-Haenszel estimator of odds ratio but do not require the assumption of independence among relatives. A robust test statistic for possible effects of covariates such as the matching variables for cases and controls on odds ratio is also presented. In data on 156 adult first-degree relatives of 28 cases with demonstrated airway obstruction and 28 controls matched for age, sex, race, and hospital status, there appeared to be a difference in the odds ratio among families of black and white case-control pairs. However, the small sample size available prevents conclusive interpretation of this observation.

摘要

本文提出了一种回归模型,用于估计协变量对优势比的影响,以检验病例和对照的一级亲属中常见疾病的家族聚集性,并通过一项慢性阻塞性肺疾病研究的家庭数据进行了说明。这些估计量本质上是优势比的Mantel-Haenszel估计量的扩展,但不需要亲属之间独立性的假设。还提出了一个稳健的检验统计量,用于检验协变量(如病例和对照的匹配变量)对优势比的可能影响。在28例有气道阻塞的病例和28例年龄、性别、种族和医院状态匹配的对照的156名成年一级亲属的数据中,黑人和白人病例对照对的家庭之间的优势比似乎存在差异。然而,可用的小样本量妨碍了对这一观察结果的确定性解释。

相似文献

1
Application of odds ratio regression models for assessing familial aggregation from case-control studies.应用比值比回归模型评估病例对照研究中的家族聚集性。
Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Oct;124(4):678-83. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114441.
2
An analytical method for assessing patterns of familial aggregation in case-control studies.
Genet Epidemiol. 1992;9(2):141-54. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370090206.
3
Extended Mantel-Haenszel estimating procedure for multivariate logistic regression models.多元逻辑回归模型的扩展Mantel-Haenszel估计程序。
Biometrics. 1987 Jun;43(2):289-99.
4
Familial aggregation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: use of the loglinear model to analyze intermediate environmental and genetic risk factors.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的家族聚集性:运用对数线性模型分析中间环境和遗传风险因素。
Genet Epidemiol. 1985;2(2):155-66. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370020206.
5
Estimation of a common odds ratio in case-control studies of familial aggregation.家族聚集性病例对照研究中共同比值比的估计。
Biometrics. 1988 Jun;44(2):369-78.
6
Genetic epidemiology of severe, early-onset chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Risk to relatives for airflow obstruction and chronic bronchitis.重度早发性慢性阻塞性肺疾病的遗传流行病学。亲属患气流阻塞和慢性支气管炎的风险。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Jun;157(6 Pt 1):1770-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.6.9706014.
7
[Analysis of familial aggregation of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases].
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1997 Mar;31(2):107-9.
8
Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.使用逻辑回归和倾向评分分层法估计边缘比值比的估计值和置信区间。
Stat Med. 2010 Mar 30;29(7-8):760-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.3811.
9
Elementary methods for the analysis of dichotomous outcomes in unselected samples of twins.对未选择的双胞胎样本中二分结局进行分析的基本方法。
Genet Epidemiol. 1992;9(4):273-87. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370090406.
10
Familial aggregation of irritable bowel syndrome: a family case-control study.肠易激综合征的家族聚集性:一项家族病例对照研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Apr;105(4):833-41. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.116. Epub 2010 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the reliability and validity of two versions of the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT).检验两种版本的努力-回报付出任务(EEfRT)的可靠性和有效性。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 28;17(1):e0262902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262902. eCollection 2022.
2
Enhanced neural responses in specific phases of reward processing in individuals with Internet gaming disorder.网络游戏障碍个体在奖励加工特定阶段的神经反应增强。
J Behav Addict. 2021 Feb 10;10(1):99-111. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00003.
3
A low dosage of the dopamine D2-receptor antagonist sulpiride affects effort allocation for reward regardless of trait extraversion.
低剂量的多巴胺D2受体拮抗剂舒必利会影响奖励的努力分配,无论其特质外向性如何。
Personal Neurosci. 2020 Jun 23;3:e7. doi: 10.1017/pen.2020.7. eCollection 2020.
4
Effort-based decision making varies by smoking status.基于努力的决策因吸烟状况而异。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Apr;237(4):1081-1090. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05437-3. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
5
Deficits in voluntary pursuit and inhibition of risk taking in sensation seeking.寻求刺激者在自愿追求和抑制冒险行为方面存在缺陷。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Dec;38(12):6019-6028. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23807. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
6
A Longitudinal Analysis of the Effects of Socioeconomic Factors, Foreign Media, and Attitude toward Appearance on General and Central Adiposity in Chinese Adolescents.社会经济因素、外国媒体及外貌态度对中国青少年全身及腹部肥胖影响的纵向分析
Prev Med Rep. 2015;2:608-214. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.07.003.
7
Effort-based decision-making in major depressive disorder: a translational model of motivational anhedonia.重度抑郁症中的基于努力的决策:动机快感缺失的转化模型。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Aug;121(3):553-8. doi: 10.1037/a0028813. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
8
Prevention of sexually transmitted infections in urban communities (Peru PREVEN): a multicomponent community-randomised controlled trial.城市社区中预防性传播感染(秘鲁 PREVEN):一项多组分社区随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2012 Mar 24;379(9821):1120-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61846-1. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
9
Amping up effort: effects of d-amphetamine on human effort-based decision-making.努力加倍:安非他命对人类基于努力的决策的影响。
J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 16;31(46):16597-602. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4387-11.2011.
10
One-year postcollaborative depression care trial outcomes among predominantly Hispanic diabetes safety net patients.主要为西班牙裔的糖尿病安全网患者的协作性抑郁症护理试验一年后结果。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011 Sep-Oct;33(5):436-42. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.05.018. Epub 2011 Jul 19.