• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因果信息活动流模型为网络生成的认知激活提供了机制上的见解。

Causally informed activity flow models provide mechanistic insight into network-generated cognitive activations.

机构信息

Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.

Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2023 Sep;278:120300. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120300. Epub 2023 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120300
PMID:37524170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10634378/
Abstract

Brain activity flow models estimate the movement of task-evoked activity over brain connections to help explain network-generated task functionality. Activity flow models have been shown to accurately generate task-evoked brain activations across a wide variety of brain regions and task conditions. However, these models have had limited explanatory power, given known issues with causal interpretations of the standard functional connectivity measures used to parameterize activity flow models. We show here that functional/effective connectivity (FC) measures grounded in causal principles facilitate mechanistic interpretation of activity flow models. We progress from simple to complex FC measures, with each adding algorithmic details reflecting causal principles. This reflects many neuroscientists' preference for reduced FC measure complexity (to minimize assumptions, minimize compute time, and fully comprehend and easily communicate methodological details), which potentially trades off with causal validity. We start with Pearson correlation (the current field standard) to remain maximally relevant to the field, estimating causal validity across a range of FC measures using simulations and empirical fMRI data. Finally, we apply causal-FC-based activity flow modeling to a dorsolateral prefrontal cortex region (DLPFC), demonstrating distributed causal network mechanisms contributing to its strong activation during a working memory task. Notably, this fully distributed model is able to account for DLPFC working memory effects traditionally thought to rely primarily on within-region (i.e., not distributed) recurrent processes. Together, these results reveal the promise of parameterizing activity flow models using causal FC methods to identify network mechanisms underlying cognitive computations in the human brain.

摘要

脑活动流模型估计任务诱发活动在脑连接上的移动,以帮助解释网络产生的任务功能。活动流模型已被证明能够在广泛的大脑区域和任务条件下准确生成任务诱发的大脑激活。然而,鉴于用于参数化活动流模型的标准功能连接测量存在因果解释的已知问题,这些模型的解释能力有限。我们在这里表明,基于因果原理的功能/有效连接(FC)测量有助于对活动流模型进行机制解释。我们从简单到复杂的 FC 测量进行,每个测量都增加了反映因果原则的算法细节。这反映了许多神经科学家对减少 FC 测量复杂性的偏好(以最小化假设、最小化计算时间,并完全理解和轻松传达方法细节),这可能会与因果有效性产生权衡。我们从 Pearson 相关系数(当前领域的标准)开始,以保持与该领域的最大相关性,使用模拟和实证 fMRI 数据来估计一系列 FC 测量的因果有效性。最后,我们将基于因果的 FC 的活动流模型应用于背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)区域,证明了分布式因果网络机制对其在工作记忆任务中强烈激活的贡献。值得注意的是,这个完全分布式的模型能够解释传统上认为主要依赖于区域内(即非分布式)递归过程的 DLPFC 工作记忆效应。总之,这些结果表明,使用因果 FC 方法对活动流模型进行参数化可以识别人类大脑中认知计算的网络机制,具有很大的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b09/10634378/941e8eb7ef34/nihms-1924376-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b09/10634378/3b6a0df447f0/nihms-1924376-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b09/10634378/baf53d84ab81/nihms-1924376-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b09/10634378/b291ffb5df92/nihms-1924376-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b09/10634378/6c6647257eff/nihms-1924376-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b09/10634378/db609cfb51ab/nihms-1924376-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b09/10634378/941e8eb7ef34/nihms-1924376-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b09/10634378/3b6a0df447f0/nihms-1924376-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b09/10634378/baf53d84ab81/nihms-1924376-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b09/10634378/b291ffb5df92/nihms-1924376-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b09/10634378/6c6647257eff/nihms-1924376-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b09/10634378/db609cfb51ab/nihms-1924376-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b09/10634378/941e8eb7ef34/nihms-1924376-f0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Causally informed activity flow models provide mechanistic insight into network-generated cognitive activations.因果信息活动流模型为网络生成的认知激活提供了机制上的见解。
Neuroimage. 2023 Sep;278:120300. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120300. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
2
Activity flow underlying abnormalities in brain activations and cognition in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中脑激活和认知异常的活动流程。
Sci Adv. 2021 Jul 14;7(29). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf2513. Print 2021 Jul.
3
Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations.静息态网络上的活动流塑造了认知任务激活。
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Dec;19(12):1718-1726. doi: 10.1038/nn.4406. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
4
The Functional Relevance of Task-State Functional Connectivity.任务态功能连接的功能相关性。
J Neurosci. 2021 Mar 24;41(12):2684-2702. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1713-20.2021. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Modeling the association between functional connectivity and lateralization with the activity flow framework.用活动流框架模拟功能连接与偏侧化之间的关系。
Brain Res. 2024 May 1;1830:148831. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2024.148831. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
6
Resting state networks in empirical and simulated dynamic functional connectivity.实证和模拟动态功能连接中的静息态网络。
Neuroimage. 2017 Oct 1;159:388-402. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.065. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
7
Multivariate dynamical systems-based estimation of causal brain interactions in fMRI: Group-level validation using benchmark data, neurophysiological models and human connectome project data.基于多变量动力系统的功能磁共振成像中大脑因果交互作用估计:使用基准数据、神经生理模型和人类连接组计划数据进行组水平验证
J Neurosci Methods. 2016 Aug 1;268:142-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
8
Task activations produce spurious but systematic inflation of task functional connectivity estimates.任务激活会产生虚假但系统的任务功能连接估计膨胀。
Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 1;189:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.054. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
9
Reduced neural connectivity but increased task-related activity during working memory in de novo Parkinson patients.初发帕金森病患者在工作记忆过程中神经连接性降低但任务相关活动增加。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Apr;36(4):1554-66. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22723. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
10
Context-dependency in the Cognitive Bias Task and Resting-state Functional Connectivity of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex.情境依赖与背外侧前额叶皮质的静息态功能连接在认知偏差任务中的表现
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 Sep;26(8):749-762. doi: 10.1017/S1355617720000302. Epub 2020 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Distributed Cortical Network Dynamics of Binocular Convergent Eye Movements in Humans.人类双眼会聚眼球运动的分布式皮质网络动力学
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 21:2025.08.15.670412. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.15.670412.
2
Regularized partial correlation provides reliable functional connectivity estimates while correcting for widespread confounding.正则化偏相关在校正广泛存在的混杂因素的同时,提供了可靠的功能连接估计。
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 22:2023.09.16.558065. doi: 10.1101/2023.09.16.558065.
3
Exploring the transmission of cognitive task information through optimal brain pathways.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical perspective on functional and causal neural connectomics: The Time-Aware PC algorithm.从统计学角度看功能和因果神经连接组学:时间感知 PC 算法。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Nov 14;18(11):e1010653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010653. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Network modeling of dynamic brain interactions predicts emergence of neural information that supports human cognitive behavior.动态大脑相互作用的网络建模预测了支持人类认知行为的神经信息的出现。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Aug 18;20(8):e3001686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001686. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Latent functional connectivity underlying multiple brain states.
探索认知任务信息通过最佳脑通路的传递。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Mar 7;21(3):e1012870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012870. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Distributed network flows generate localized category selectivity in human visual cortex.分布式网络流在人类视觉皮层中产生局部类别选择性。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Oct 22;20(10):e1012507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012507. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
TSP-GNN: a novel neuropsychiatric disorder classification framework based on task-specific prior knowledge and graph neural network.TSP-GNN:一种基于特定任务先验知识和图神经网络的新型神经精神疾病分类框架。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Dec 21;17:1288882. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1288882. eCollection 2023.
多种脑状态下的潜在功能连接
Netw Neurosci. 2022 Jun 1;6(2):570-590. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00234. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS.增强工作记忆:揭示经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和经颅交流电刺激(tACS)的不同效果。
Cereb Cortex Commun. 2022 May 7;3(2):tgac018. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgac018. eCollection 2022.
5
Constructing neural network models from brain data reveals representational transformations linked to adaptive behavior.从脑数据构建神经网络模型揭示了与自适应行为相关的表示变换。
Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 3;13(1):673. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28323-7.
6
Predicting individual task contrasts from resting-state functional connectivity using a surface-based convolutional network.基于曲面的卷积网络从静息态功能连接预测个体任务对比。
Neuroimage. 2022 Mar;248:118849. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118849. Epub 2021 Dec 26.
7
Activity flow underlying abnormalities in brain activations and cognition in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中脑激活和认知异常的活动流程。
Sci Adv. 2021 Jul 14;7(29). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf2513. Print 2021 Jul.
8
Dynamic causal brain circuits during working memory and their functional controllability.工作记忆期间的动态因果脑回路及其功能可控性。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 29;12(1):3314. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23509-x.
9
Brain network mechanisms of visual shape completion.视觉形状完成的脑网络机制。
Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 1;236:118069. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118069. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
10
The Functional Relevance of Task-State Functional Connectivity.任务态功能连接的功能相关性。
J Neurosci. 2021 Mar 24;41(12):2684-2702. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1713-20.2021. Epub 2021 Feb 4.