• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型的糖尿病患者对比剂诱导 AKI 可解释在线计算器:多中心验证和前瞻性评估研究。

A novel explainable online calculator for contrast-induced AKI in diabetics: a multi-centre validation and prospective evaluation study.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, China.

Department of Nephrology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

J Transl Med. 2023 Jul 31;21(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04387-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12967-023-04387-x
PMID:37525240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10391987/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI) is a frequent complication, especially in diabetics, and is connected with severe mortality and morbidity in the short and long term. Therefore, we aimed to develop a CIAKI predictive model for diabetic patients.

METHODS

3514 patients with diabetes from four hospitals were separated into three cohorts: training, internal validation, and external validation. We developed six machine learning (ML) algorithms models: random forest (RF), gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDT), logistic regression (LR), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator with LR, extreme gradient boosting trees (XGBT), and support vector machine (SVM). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of ML models was compared to the prior score model, and developed a brief CIAKI prediction model for diabetes (BCPMD). We also validated BCPMD model on the prospective cohort of 172 patients from one of the hospitals. To explain the prediction model, the shapley additive explanations (SHAP) approach was used.

RESULTS

In the six ML models, XGBT performed best in the cohort of internal (AUC: 0.816 (95% CI 0.777-0.853)) and external validation (AUC: 0.816 (95% CI 0.770-0.861)), and we determined the top 15 important predictors in XGBT model as BCPMD model variables. The features of BCPMD included acute coronary syndromes (ACS), urine protein level, diuretics, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%), hemoglobin (g/L), congestive heart failure (CHF), stable Angina, uric acid (umol/L), preoperative diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (mmHg), contrast volumes (mL), albumin (g/L), baseline creatinine (umol/L), vessels of coronary artery disease, glucose (mmol/L) and diabetes history (yrs). Then, we validated BCPMD in the cohort of internal validation (AUC: 0.819 (95% CI 0.783-0.855)), the cohort of external validation (AUC: 0.805 (95% CI 0.755-0.850)) and the cohort of prospective validation (AUC: 0.801 (95% CI 0.688-0.887)). SHAP was constructed to provide personalized interpretation for each patient. Our model also has been developed into an online web risk calculator. MissForest was used to handle the missing values of the calculator.

CONCLUSION

We developed a novel risk calculator for CIAKI in diabetes based on the ML model, which can help clinicians achieve real-time prediction and explainable clinical decisions.

摘要

背景

在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者中,对比剂诱导的急性肾损伤(CIAKI)是一种常见的并发症,尤其是在糖尿病患者中,并且与短期和长期的严重死亡率和发病率有关。因此,我们旨在为糖尿病患者开发一种 CIAKI 预测模型。

方法

来自四家医院的 3514 名糖尿病患者被分为三个队列:训练、内部验证和外部验证。我们开发了六种机器学习(ML)算法模型:随机森林(RF)、梯度提升决策树(GBDT)、逻辑回归(LR)、带有 LR 的最小绝对收缩和选择算子、极端梯度提升树(XGBT)和支持向量机(SVM)。比较了 ML 模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)与先前评分模型,并为糖尿病患者开发了一种简单的 CIAKI 预测模型(BCPMD)。我们还在其中一家医院的前瞻性队列中对 172 名患者的 BCPMD 模型进行了验证。为了解释预测模型,使用了 Shapley 加性解释(SHAP)方法。

结果

在这六种 ML 模型中,XGBT 在内部验证队列(AUC:0.816(95%CI 0.777-0.853))和外部验证队列(AUC:0.816(95%CI 0.770-0.861))中表现最佳,我们确定 XGBT 模型中的前 15 个重要预测因子为 BCPMD 模型变量。BCPMD 的特征包括急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)、尿蛋白水平、利尿剂、左心室射血分数(LVEF)(%)、血红蛋白(g/L)、充血性心力衰竭(CHF)、稳定型心绞痛、尿酸(umol/L)、术前舒张压(DBP)(mmHg)、造影剂体积(mL)、白蛋白(g/L)、基线肌酐(umol/L)、冠状动脉疾病血管、血糖(mmol/L)和糖尿病病史(yrs)。然后,我们在内部验证队列(AUC:0.819(95%CI 0.783-0.855))、外部验证队列(AUC:0.805(95%CI 0.755-0.850))和前瞻性验证队列(AUC:0.801(95%CI 0.688-0.887))中验证了 BCPMD。使用 SHAP 构建了个性化解释每个患者的模型。我们的模型还已开发为在线网络风险计算器。使用 MissForest 处理计算器的缺失值。

结论

我们基于机器学习模型为糖尿病患者开发了一种新的 CIAKI 风险计算器,可以帮助临床医生实现实时预测和可解释的临床决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2689/10391987/d8945fea3376/12967_2023_4387_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2689/10391987/581335948ee6/12967_2023_4387_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2689/10391987/5b238af24e27/12967_2023_4387_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2689/10391987/bf45a8259a8f/12967_2023_4387_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2689/10391987/ea161dec599f/12967_2023_4387_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2689/10391987/672628265527/12967_2023_4387_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2689/10391987/d8945fea3376/12967_2023_4387_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2689/10391987/581335948ee6/12967_2023_4387_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2689/10391987/5b238af24e27/12967_2023_4387_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2689/10391987/bf45a8259a8f/12967_2023_4387_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2689/10391987/ea161dec599f/12967_2023_4387_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2689/10391987/672628265527/12967_2023_4387_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2689/10391987/d8945fea3376/12967_2023_4387_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A novel explainable online calculator for contrast-induced AKI in diabetics: a multi-centre validation and prospective evaluation study.一种新型的糖尿病患者对比剂诱导 AKI 可解释在线计算器:多中心验证和前瞻性评估研究。
J Transl Med. 2023 Jul 31;21(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04387-x.
2
Predictive modeling for acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a machine learning approach.急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性肾损伤的预测模型:机器学习方法。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 24;29(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01675-0.
3
Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery in Two Centers in China: Retrospective Study.中国两个中心用于预测非心脏手术后心肌损伤的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证:一项回顾性研究
JMIR Aging. 2024 Jul 26;7:e54872. doi: 10.2196/54872.
4
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: Model Development and Validation Study.基于机器学习的小儿心脏手术后急性肾损伤预测:模型开发与验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 5;25:e41142. doi: 10.2196/41142.
5
Predicting acute kidney injury risk in acute myocardial infarction patients: An artificial intelligence model using medical information mart for intensive care databases.预测急性心肌梗死患者的急性肾损伤风险:一种使用重症监护数据库医学信息集市的人工智能模型。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 7;9:964894. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.964894. eCollection 2022.
6
[Comparison of machine learning and Logistic regression model in predicting acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: data analysis based on MIMIC-III database].[机器学习与逻辑回归模型在预测心脏手术后急性肾损伤中的比较:基于MIMIC-III数据库的数据分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Nov;34(11):1188-1193. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210223-00279.
7
Enhancing the prediction of acute kidney injury risk after percutaneous coronary intervention using machine learning techniques: A retrospective cohort study.利用机器学习技术提高经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性肾损伤风险的预测:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 27;15(11):e1002703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002703. eCollection 2018 Nov.
8
A simple machine learning model for the prediction of acute kidney injury following noncardiac surgery in geriatric patients: a prospective cohort study.一种用于预测老年非心脏手术后急性肾损伤的简单机器学习模型:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 25;24(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05148-1.
9
Machine Learning for Predicting Risk and Prognosis of Acute Kidney Disease in Critically Ill Elderly Patients During Hospitalization: Internet-Based and Interpretable Model Study.基于互联网的可解释模型研究:机器学习在预测住院期间危重症老年患者急性肾损伤风险和预后中的应用。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 1;26:e51354. doi: 10.2196/51354.
10
Establishment and validation of a heart failure risk prediction model for elderly patients after coronary rotational atherectomy based on machine learning.基于机器学习的老年患者冠状动脉旋磨术后心力衰竭风险预测模型的建立与验证
PeerJ. 2024 Jan 31;12:e16867. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16867. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Predict and prevent microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study in Chinese communities.预测和预防2型糖尿病的微血管并发症:一项针对中国社区的横断面和纵向研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 31;16:1541663. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1541663. eCollection 2025.
2
Web-Based Explainable Machine Learning-Based Drug Surveillance for Predicting Sunitinib- and Sorafenib-Associated Thyroid Dysfunction: Model Development and Validation Study.基于网络的可解释机器学习药物监测,用于预测舒尼替尼和索拉非尼相关的甲状腺功能障碍:模型开发与验证研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 10;9:e67767. doi: 10.2196/67767.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin monitoring reveals persistent subclinical kidney injury following intraarterial administration of iodinated contrast agents.中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白监测显示,动脉内给予碘造影剂后持续存在亚临床肾脏损伤。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 14;12(1):19464. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24169-7.
2
A Clinical Nomogram Based on the Triglyceride-Glucose Index to Predict Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury after Percutaneous Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome with Diabetes Mellitus.基于三酰甘油-葡萄糖指数的临床列线图预测糖尿病急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后对比剂诱导的急性肾损伤。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2022 Oct 27;2022:5443880. doi: 10.1155/2022/5443880. eCollection 2022.
3
A Machine Learning Model for Predicting Prognosis in HCC Patients With Diabetes After TACE.
一种用于预测肝癌合并糖尿病患者经动脉化疗栓塞术后预后的机器学习模型。
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2025 Jan 21;12:77-91. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S496481. eCollection 2025.
4
Risk prediction models for successful discontinuation in acute kidney injury undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.接受持续肾脏替代治疗的急性肾损伤患者成功停药的风险预测模型。
iScience. 2024 Jun 27;27(8):110397. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110397. eCollection 2024 Aug 16.
5
Explainable Boosting Machine approach identifies risk factors for acute renal failure.可解释增强机器方法识别急性肾衰竭的风险因素。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2024 Jun 14;12(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s40635-024-00639-2.
6
Evaluating the Differential Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Among Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者发生对比剂肾病的差异风险。
Cureus. 2024 Feb 3;16(2):e53493. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53493. eCollection 2024 Feb.
A risk score model of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with emergency percutaneous coronary interventions.
急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者对比剂诱导的急性肾损伤风险评分模型
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 13;9:989243. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.989243. eCollection 2022.
4
The Utility of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index for Predicting Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.全身免疫炎症指数在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中预测对比剂肾病的价值。
Cardiorenal Med. 2022;12(2):71-80. doi: 10.1159/000524945. Epub 2022 May 17.
5
Machine learning for the prediction of acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis.机器学习在脓毒症患者急性肾损伤预测中的应用。
J Transl Med. 2022 May 13;20(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03364-0.
6
Development and Validation of a Risk Nomogram Model for Predicting Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.开发和验证预测行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者对比剂诱导急性肾损伤风险列线图模型。
Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Jan 26;17:65-77. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S349159. eCollection 2022.
7
Using Machine Learning to Identify Metabolomic Signatures of Pediatric Chronic Kidney Disease Etiology.利用机器学习识别儿科慢性肾脏病病因的代谢组学特征。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 Feb;33(2):375-386. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021040538. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
8
A contemporary simple risk score for prediction of contrast-associated acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention: derivation and validation from an observational registry.当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后对比剂相关急性肾损伤的简单风险评分:来自观察性注册研究的推导和验证。
Lancet. 2021 Nov 27;398(10315):1974-1983. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02326-6. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
9
Use of Deep Learning to Predict Acute Kidney Injury After Intravenous Contrast Media Administration: Prediction Model Development Study.利用深度学习预测静脉注射造影剂后急性肾损伤:预测模型开发研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Oct 1;9(10):e27177. doi: 10.2196/27177.
10
Risk of Worsening Renal Function Following Repeated Exposures to Contrast Media During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中反复接触对比剂后肾功能恶化的风险。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Sep 21;10(18):e021473. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021473. Epub 2021 Sep 17.