[一种工具的心理测量特性3：收敛效度、区分效度、已知群体效度和标准效度]
[Psychometric properties of an instrument 3: convergent, discriminant, known-groups, and criterion validity].
作者信息
Lee Eun-Hyun
出版信息
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2021 Sep 30;27(3):176-179. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2021.08.18.
Abstract
Before evaluating convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity, it is suggested to design an instrument that reflects hypothetical relationships or differences with other comparator instruments or groups. For criterion validity, a gold-standard instrument measuring the same construct should be carefully selected.
摘要
在评估聚合效度、区分效度和已知群组效度之前，建议设计一种能够反映与其他比较工具或群组的假设关系或差异的工具。对于效标效度，应仔细选择测量相同构念的金标准工具。
相似文献
1
[Psychometric properties of an instrument 3: convergent, discriminant, known-groups, and criterion validity].[一种工具的心理测量特性3：收敛效度、区分效度、已知群体效度和标准效度]
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2021 Sep 30;27(3):176-179. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2021.08.18.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of Rosenberg's self-esteem scale.罗森伯格自尊量表瑞典语版本的心理测量评估。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;72(5):318-324. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2018.1457177. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
3
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
4
Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Worker Role Self-Assessment (WRS) When Used for People With Psychiatric Disabilities in Sweden.瑞典将工作者角色自我评估（WRS）用于精神残疾人士时的因子结构与结构效度
Eval Health Prof. 2016 Sep;39(3):299-316. doi: 10.1177/0163278716643825. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
5
Measuring Electronic Health Literacy: Development, Validation, and Test of Measurement Invariance of a Revised German Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale.测量电子健康素养：电子健康素养量表修订版的德国版本的开发、验证和测量不变性测试。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e28252. doi: 10.2196/28252.
6
Suitability of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) for Economic Evaluation: An Assessment of Its Convergent and Discriminant Validity.嗜睡量表（ESS）用于经济评估的适宜性：对其收敛和判别效度的评估。
Behav Sleep Med. 2018 Sep-Oct;16(5):448-470. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2016.1228647. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish Quality of Dyadic Relationships scale - homogeneity and construct validity.瑞典二元关系质量量表的心理测量评估——同质性和结构效度。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2021 Jun;35(2):468-475. doi: 10.1111/scs.12858. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
8
Studying Latent Criterion Validity for Complex Structure Measuring Instruments Using Latent Variable Modeling.使用潜在变量建模研究复杂结构测量工具的潜在准则效度。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Oct;78(5):905-917. doi: 10.1177/0013164417698017. Epub 2017 Mar 26.
9
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Connectedness with Health Care Providers Scale for Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer.青少年和青年癌症患者与医疗保健提供者联系感量表的编制与心理测量学评价。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2020 Apr;9(2):271-277. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0067. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
10
Measurement of quality of life in patients with lung cancer in multicenter trials of new therapies. Psychometric assessment of the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale.新疗法多中心试验中肺癌患者生活质量的测量。肺癌症状量表的心理测量评估。
Cancer. 1994 Apr 15;73(8):2087-98. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940415)73:8<2087::aid-cncr2820730813>3.0.co;2-x.
引用本文的文献
1
[Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Occupational Coping Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses].[护士职业应对自我效能量表韩文版的效度与信度]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2024 Nov;54(4):633-644. doi: 10.4040/jkan.24094.
2
Development and Psychometric Properties of the Health Belief Model Scale for Premature Birth Prevention (HBM-PBP) for Women of Childbearing Age.育龄女性早产预防健康信念模式量表（HBM-PBP）的编制及心理测量学特性
Int J Womens Health. 2024 Jun 26;16:1173-1186. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S456201. eCollection 2024.
3
Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in North Korean Defectors: A Scoping Review.朝鲜脱北者创伤后应激障碍患者报告结局测量的属性：一项范围综述
Psychiatry Investig. 2023 Jul;20(7):593-608. doi: 10.30773/pi.2022.0363. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
4
The Korean Version of Pandemic Stress Questionnaire: Validation in Korean Population.《大流行应激问卷》韩文版：在韩国人群中的效度验证
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2023 May 30;21(2):377-385. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2023.21.2.377.
5
[The Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of Readiness for Practice Survey for Nursing Students].[韩国护理专业学生实践准备度调查问卷的效度与信度]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2022 Dec;52(6):564-581. doi: 10.4040/jkan.22032.
6
Year in review and appreciation for 2021 reviewers.2021年回顾及对审稿人的感谢
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2021 Dec 31;27(4):265-267. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2021.12.13. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
本文引用的文献
1
Evaluation of Studies on the Measurement Properties of Self-Reported Instruments.自评工具测量特性研究的评价。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 Dec;14(5):267-276. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
2
Patient-reported outcome measures for diabetes self-care: A systematic review of measurement properties.糖尿病自我护理患者报告结局测量指标：系统评价测量特性。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 May;105:103498. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103498. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
3
A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: Development and psychometric evaluation.一个新的综合性糖尿病健康素养量表：编制与心理测量学评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
4
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价偏倚风险清单。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
5
Irritable bowel syndrome-specific health-related quality of life instrument: development and psychometric evaluation.肠易激综合征特异性健康相关生活质量量表：编制与心理测量学评价
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Feb 17;14:22. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0423-9.
6
Psychometric Properties of the Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale in Korean Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.韩国2型糖尿病患者糖尿病管理自我效能量表的心理测量学特性
Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:780701. doi: 10.1155/2015/780701. Epub 2015 May 18.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R) for patients with type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病症状检查表修订版（DSC-R）韩文版的心理计量学评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 May 19;12:77. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-77.
8
The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes.COSMIN 研究就健康相关患者报告结局的测量属性的分类学、术语和定义达成了国际共识。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):737-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R)--a measure of symptom distress.糖尿病症状清单修订版（DSC-R）的心理计量学评估——一种症状困扰的测量工具。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1168-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00571.x. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
Zotero 插件