[一种工具的心理测量特性2：结构效度、内部一致性和跨文化效度/测量不变性]
[Psychometric properties of an instrument 2: structural validity, internal consistency, and cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance].
作者信息
Lee Eun-Hyun
出版信息
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2021 Jun 30;27(2):69-74. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2021.05.18. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
Abstract
Structural validity, internal consistency, and cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance are psychometric properties of the internal structure of an instrument. In psychometric studies published in Korean nursing journals, structural validity has mainly been assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. Cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance has rarely been evaluated. It is recommended for Korean nursing researchers to evaluate the internal structure of instruments using a greater variety of methods, such as item response theory, Rasch analysis, multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, and differential item functioning.
摘要
结构效度、内部一致性以及跨文化效度/测量不变性是一种工具内部结构的心理测量学特性。在韩国护理期刊发表的心理测量学研究中，结构效度主要通过验证性因子分析进行评估。跨文化效度/测量不变性很少被评估。建议韩国护理研究人员使用更多样化的方法来评估工具的内部结构，如项目反应理论、拉施分析、多组验证性因子分析和项目功能差异分析。
相似文献
1
[Psychometric properties of an instrument 2: structural validity, internal consistency, and cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance].[一种工具的心理测量特性2：结构效度、内部一致性和跨文化效度/测量不变性]
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2021 Jun 30;27(2):69-74. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2021.05.18. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
2
Evaluation of Studies on the Measurement Properties of Self-Reported Instruments.自评工具测量特性研究的评价。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 Dec;14(5):267-276. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
3
Psychometric properties of instruments used to measure the cultural competence of nurses: A systematic review.测量护士文化能力的工具的心理测量学特性：系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jan;113:103789. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103789. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
4
The Hausa 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12): Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation in mixed urban and rural Nigerian populations with chronic low back pain.《豪萨 12 项简短健康调查（SF-12）》：在患有慢性下腰痛的混合城乡尼日利亚人群中进行翻译、跨文化调适和验证。
PLoS One. 2020 May 7;15(5):e0232223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232223. eCollection 2020.
5
Assessing cross-cultural validity of scales: a methodological review and illustrative example.评估量表的跨文化效度：方法学综述及实例说明
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Jan;45(1):110-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.09.002. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
6
[Measurement properties of self-report questionnaires published in Korean nursing journals].[韩国护理期刊发表的自我报告问卷的测量属性]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013 Feb;43(1):50-8. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2013.43.1.50.
7
Psychometric properties of the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale in Greek Adolescents.希腊青少年版修订儿童焦虑抑郁量表的心理测量特性
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;27(2):424-438. doi: 10.1177/13591045211056502. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
8
Cross-Cultural Adaption and Psychometric Evaluation of the German Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI).跨文化调适与心理计量评估的德国颅面疼痛和残疾量表 (CF-PDI)。
Pain Physician. 2021 Sep;24(6):E857-E866.
9
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷：医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
10
Evaluation of psychometric properties of needs assessment tools in cancer patients: A systematic literature review.癌症患者需求评估工具的心理测量学特性评价：系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 8;14(1):e0210242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210242. eCollection 2019.
引用本文的文献
1
Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in North Korean Defectors: A Scoping Review.朝鲜脱北者创伤后应激障碍患者报告结局测量的属性：一项范围综述
Psychiatry Investig. 2023 Jul;20(7):593-608. doi: 10.30773/pi.2022.0363. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
2
[The Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of Readiness for Practice Survey for Nursing Students].[韩国护理专业学生实践准备度调查问卷的效度与信度]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2022 Dec;52(6):564-581. doi: 10.4040/jkan.22032.
3
is indexed in Scopus and stepping closer to international connectivity.被收录在Scopus中，并且正在更接近国际连通性。
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2021 Jun 30;27(2):59-63. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2021.06.16. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
4
Year in review and appreciation for 2021 reviewers.2021年回顾及对审稿人的感谢
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2021 Dec 31;27(4):265-267. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2021.12.13. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
本文引用的文献
1
Development and Validation of the Humanistic Practice Ability of Nursing Scale.护理人文实践能力量表的编制及信效度检验。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2021 May;15(2):105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.12.003. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
2
Cross-cultural applicability of the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale in a multi-national study.跨文化适用性的自我护理自我效能感量表在一个多国家的研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Feb;77(2):681-692. doi: 10.1111/jan.14617. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
3
Evaluation of Studies on the Measurement Properties of Self-Reported Instruments.自评工具测量特性研究的评价。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 Dec;14(5):267-276. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
4
The Core Knowledge and Skills of Nursing Competency Regarding Mealtime Assistance for Hemiplegic Patients in China.中国偏瘫患者进食辅助护理能力的核心知识与技能。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 May;14(2):129-135. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
5
The 21-Item and 12-Item Versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales: Psychometric Evaluation in a Korean Population.抑郁焦虑压力量表的21项和12项版本：韩国人群的心理测量学评估
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2019 Feb;13(1):30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
6
A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: Development and psychometric evaluation.一个新的综合性糖尿病健康素养量表：编制与心理测量学评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
7
A Danish version of self-efficacy in diabetes self-management: A valid and reliable questionnaire affected by age and sex.丹麦版糖尿病自我管理自我效能感问卷：受年龄和性别影响的有效且可靠的问卷。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 May;19(3):544-552. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12601. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
8
Psychometric Properties of the Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale in Korean Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.韩国2型糖尿病患者糖尿病管理自我效能量表的心理测量学特性
Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:780701. doi: 10.1155/2015/780701. Epub 2015 May 18.
9
The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes.COSMIN 研究就健康相关患者报告结局的测量属性的分类学、术语和定义达成了国际共识。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):737-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.
Zotero 插件