• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Characteristics of Traumatic Patients Referring to the Emergency Department and their Association with Mortality and Incidence of Surgery Performance.急诊科创伤患者的特征及其与死亡率和手术发生率的关联。
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2023;11(3):132-137. doi: 10.30476/BEAT.2023.97729.1413.
2
Analysis of Shahid Rajaee hospital administrative data on injuries resulting from car accidents in Shiraz, Iran: 2011-2014 data.伊朗设拉子沙希德拉贾伊医院关于2011 - 2014年车祸所致损伤的行政数据分析
Chin J Traumatol. 2017 Feb;20(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.10.006. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
3
Specific abbreviated injury scale values are responsible for the underestimation of mortality in penetrating trauma patients by the injury severity score.特定的简明损伤定级(AIS)值导致损伤严重度评分低估穿透性创伤患者的死亡率。
J Trauma. 2011 Aug;71(2 Suppl 3):S384-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182287c8d.
4
[Correlation between survival time and severity of injuries in fatal injuries in traffic accidents].[交通事故致命伤中生存时间与损伤严重程度的相关性]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2001 Nov-Dec;129(11-12):291-5.
5
Same Abbreviated Injury Scale Values May Be Associated with Different Risks to Mortality in Trauma Patients: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study Based on the Trauma Registry System in a Level I Trauma Center.相同的简明损伤定级量表分值可能与创伤患者的死亡率风险相关:一项基于一级创伤中心创伤登记系统的横断面回顾性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 11;14(12):1552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121552.
6
Impact of Adapting the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)-2005 from AIS-1998 on Injury Severity Scores and Clinical Outcome.适应 AIS-2005 对伤害严重程度评分和临床结果的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 10;16(24):5033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245033.
7
Is ventilator-associated pneumonia in trauma patients an epiphenomenon or a cause of death?创伤患者的呼吸机相关性肺炎是一种附带现象还是死亡原因?
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2004 Fall;5(3):237-42. doi: 10.1089/sur.2004.5.237.
8
Pattern of Maxillofacial Injuries and Determinants of Outcome in a Large Series of Patients admitted to a Level-I Trauma Center.一级创伤中心收治的大量患者的颌面损伤模式及预后决定因素
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2019 Apr;7(2):176-182. doi: 10.29252/beat-070214.
9
Patients with severe traumatic brain injury transferred to a Level I or II trauma center: United States, 2007 to 2009.2007 年至 2009 年期间,严重创伤性脑损伤患者转送至一级或二级创伤中心:美国。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1491-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182782675.
10
Impact of AIS 2015 versus 1998 on injury severity scoring and mortality prediction - single centre retrospective comparison study.2015 年与 1998 年版 AIS 对创伤严重程度评分和死亡率预测的影响-单中心回顾性比较研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;60:73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.07.050. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Serum Levels of Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide and the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Cardiac Syncope.血清脑钠肽前体水平与心源性晕厥的诊断及预后
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2024;12(3):130-135. doi: 10.30476/beat.2024.103126.1520.
2
The Etiology of Trauma in Geriatric Traumatic Patients Refer to an Academic Trauma Center: A Cross Sectional Study.转诊至学术创伤中心的老年创伤患者的创伤病因:一项横断面研究。
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2024;12(3):124-129. doi: 10.30476/beat.2024.102627.1512.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology of trauma admissions in a level 1 trauma center in Northern Italy: a nine-year study.意大利北部 1 级创伤中心创伤患者入院的流行病学:一项 9 年研究。
Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):1963-1973. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-00991-y. Epub 2021 May 18.
2
Epidemiology of road traffic crashes in Ilam Province, Iran, 2009-2013.伊朗伊拉姆省 2009-2013 年道路交通碰撞的流行病学研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Nov 10;13(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05366-x.
3
Global road traffic injury statistics: Challenges, mechanisms and solutions.全球道路交通伤害统计:挑战、机制与解决方案。
Chin J Traumatol. 2020 Aug;23(4):216-218. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
4
Analysis of Risk Factors with Hospital Mortality in Pedestrian Injured Patients; A Dataset Analysis of a Level-I Trauma Center in Southern Iran.行人受伤患者医院死亡率的危险因素分析;伊朗南部一级创伤中心的数据集分析
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2018 Oct;6(4):349-354. doi: 10.29252/beat-060413.
5
Analysis of Prehospital Scene Times and Interventions on Mortality Outcomes in a National Cohort of Penetrating and Blunt Trauma Patients.一项针对全国穿透性和钝性创伤患者队列的院前现场时间及干预措施对死亡率影响的分析。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Nov-Dec;22(6):691-697. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1448494. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
6
Association of Prehospital Blood Product Transfusion During Medical Evacuation of Combat Casualties in Afghanistan With Acute and 30-Day Survival.阿富汗战斗伤员医疗后送期间院前血液制品输注与急性生存及30天生存率的关联
JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1581-1591. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.15097.
7
Analysis of Injury and Mortality Patterns in Deceased Patients with Road Traffic Injuries: An Autopsy Study.道路交通事故伤死亡患者损伤与死因模式分析:尸检研究。
World J Surg. 2017 Dec;41(12):3111-3119. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4122-4.
8
Prehospital blood transfusion programs: Capabilities and lessons learned.院前输血项目:能力与经验教训
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jun;82(6S Suppl 1):S70-S78. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001427.
9
Predictors of Death in Trauma Patients who are Alive on Arrival at Hospital.入院时存活的创伤患者的死亡预测因素。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2007 Feb;33(1):46-51. doi: 10.1007/s00068-007-6097-6. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
10
Potential Risk Factors of Death in Multiple Trauma Patients.多发伤患者死亡的潜在危险因素
Emerg (Tehran). 2014 Fall;2(4):170-3.

急诊科创伤患者的特征及其与死亡率和手术发生率的关联。

Characteristics of Traumatic Patients Referring to the Emergency Department and their Association with Mortality and Incidence of Surgery Performance.

作者信息

Hosseini Maryam, Shayan Leila, Yadollahi Mahnaz, Karajizadeh Mehrdad

机构信息

Truama Research Center, Shahid Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

Bull Emerg Trauma. 2023;11(3):132-137. doi: 10.30476/BEAT.2023.97729.1413.

DOI:10.30476/BEAT.2023.97729.1413
PMID:37525653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10387339/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the distinctive features of acutely injured patients who were presented to the emergency department (ED) and their association with mortality and surgical intervention outcomes.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted on all trauma patients resuscitated in the ED of Shahid Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital (Shiraz, Iran) from May 2018 to June 2019. Demographic information, the mechanism of trauma, trauma type, injured body regions, criteria of abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score, injury severity score (ISS), and surgical intervention were all taken into consideration. The items related to the mortality and surgical performance outcomes among the patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of all 1281 cases, 82.9% were men, and the mean age of the patients was 37.9±19.1 years. The most common mechanism of injury was a car accident, and the thorax was the most prevalent injured area of the body. The majority of the patients had moderate blunt trauma. The mechanism of trauma, ISS, and the severity of head trauma were all significantly correlated with operation interventions. Moreover, age, the mechanism and type of trauma, ISS, and the necessity for the surgery were significantly associated with death occurrence. Additionally, head, thorax, and abdomen trauma were significantly related to a high mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

Age, trauma mechanism and type, ISS, and the necessity for surgery were significantly associated with the mortality rate of injured patients. The severity of the trauma, particularly head injuries and the mechanism of damage were important determinants in concern for surgery the necessity.

摘要

目的

确定前往急诊科(ED)的急性受伤患者的显著特征及其与死亡率和手术干预结果的关联。

方法

本横断面研究针对2018年5月至2019年6月在伊朗设拉子沙希德拉贾伊(恩蒂亚兹)创伤医院急诊科接受复苏的所有创伤患者进行。考虑了人口统计学信息、创伤机制、创伤类型、受伤身体部位、简明损伤定级标准(AIS)评分标准、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和手术干预情况。分析了患者中与死亡率和手术表现结果相关的项目。

结果

在所有1281例病例中,82.9%为男性,患者平均年龄为37.9±19.1岁。最常见的损伤机制是车祸,胸部是身体最常受伤的部位。大多数患者有中度钝性创伤。创伤机制ISS和头部创伤的严重程度均与手术干预显著相关。此外,年龄、创伤机制和类型、ISS以及手术必要性均与死亡发生显著相关。另外,头部、胸部和腹部创伤与高死亡率显著相关。

结论

年龄、创伤机制和类型、ISS以及手术必要性与受伤患者的死亡率显著相关。创伤的严重程度,特别是头部损伤和损伤机制是关乎手术必要性的重要决定因素。