Anatomy segmentation in laparoscopic surgery: comparison of machine learning and human expertise - an experimental study.

BACKGROUND

Lack of anatomy recognition represents a clinically relevant risk in abdominal surgery. Machine learning (ML) methods can help identify visible patterns and risk structures; however, their practical value remains largely unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on a novel dataset of 13 195 laparoscopic images with pixel-wise segmentations of 11 anatomical structures, we developed specialized segmentation models for each structure and combined models for all anatomical structures using two state-of-the-art model architectures (DeepLabv3 and SegFormer) and compared segmentation performance of algorithms to a cohort of 28 physicians, medical students, and medical laypersons using the example of pancreas segmentation.

RESULTS

Mean Intersection-over-Union for semantic segmentation of intra-abdominal structures ranged from 0.28 to 0.83 and from 0.23 to 0.77 for the DeepLabv3-based structure-specific and combined models, and from 0.31 to 0.85 and from 0.26 to 0.67 for the SegFormer-based structure-specific and combined models, respectively. Both the structure-specific and the combined DeepLabv3-based models are capable of near-real-time operation, while the SegFormer-based models are not. All four models outperformed at least 26 out of 28 human participants in pancreas segmentation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that ML methods have the potential to provide relevant assistance in anatomy recognition in minimally invasive surgery in near-real-time. Future research should investigate the educational value and subsequent clinical impact of the respective assistance systems.