• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英雄所见略同:新的召回相似度量化措施。

Great minds think alike: New measures to quantify the similarity of recalls.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

Department of Psychology, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2024 Aug;56(5):4239-4254. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02174-6. Epub 2023 Aug 1.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-023-02174-6
PMID:37528292
Abstract

Given the recent interest in how memory operates in social contexts, it is more important than ever to meaningfully measure the similarity between recall sequences of different individuals. Similarity of recall sequences of different individuals has been quantified using primarily order-agnostic and some order-sensitive measures specific to memory research without agreement on any one preferred measure. However, edit distance measures have not been used to quantify the similarity of recall sequences in collaborative memory studies. In the current study, we review a broad range of similarity measures, highlighting commonalities and differences. Using simulations and behavioral data, we show that edit distances do measure a memory-relevant factor of similarity and capture information distinct from that captured by order-agnostic measures. We answer illustrative research questions which demonstrate potential applications of edit distances in collaborative and individual memory settings and reveal the unique impact collaboration has on similarity.

摘要

鉴于最近人们对社会情境中记忆运作方式的兴趣,准确衡量不同个体回忆序列之间的相似性比以往任何时候都更为重要。目前,主要使用不考虑顺序的和一些特定于记忆研究的、对顺序敏感的度量标准来量化不同个体回忆序列的相似性,但是在没有任何一个首选度量标准的情况下,这些标准并不适用于合作记忆研究中回忆序列的相似性的量化。在本研究中,我们回顾了广泛的相似性度量标准,突出了它们的共同点和不同点。使用模拟和行为数据,我们表明编辑距离确实可以衡量记忆相关的相似性因素,并捕获与不考虑顺序的度量标准所捕获的信息不同的信息。我们回答了说明性的研究问题,这些问题展示了编辑距离在合作和个体记忆环境中的潜在应用,并揭示了合作对相似性的独特影响。

相似文献

1
Great minds think alike: New measures to quantify the similarity of recalls.英雄所见略同:新的召回相似度量化措施。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Aug;56(5):4239-4254. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02174-6. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
2
Collaborative Recall and the Construction of Collective Memory Organization: The Impact of Group Structure.协作回忆与集体记忆组织的构建:群体结构的影响。
Top Cogn Sci. 2024 Apr;16(2):282-301. doi: 10.1111/tops.12639. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
3
Collective memory: Collaborative recall synchronizes what and how people remember.集体记忆:协作回忆同步了人们记忆的内容和方式。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2023 Jul-Aug;14(4):e1641. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1641. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
4
An easy way to improve scoring of memory span tasks: The edit distance, beyond "correct recall in the correct serial position".一种提高记忆跨度任务评分的简便方法:编辑距离,超越“正确序列位置的正确回忆”。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jun;55(4):2021-2036. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01908-2. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
5
Interpersonal neural synchronization underlies mnemonic similarity during collaborative remembering.人际神经同步是协作记忆过程中记忆相似性的基础。
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Dec 15;191:108732. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108732. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
6
Neural pattern similarity across concept exemplars predicts memory after a long delay.跨概念范例的神经模式相似性可预测长时间延迟后的记忆。
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 1;219:117030. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117030. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
7
Differentiating the DF effect in episodic memory: evaluating the contribution of the procedures of collaborative memory.区分情节记忆中的 DF 效应:评估协作记忆程序的贡献。
J Gen Psychol. 2024 Jul-Sep;151(3):223-270. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2023.2252133. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
8
The influence of learning methods on collaboration: prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory.学习方法对协作的影响:预先重复检索增强了检索组织,消除了协作抑制,并促进了协作后的记忆。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Nov;140(4):535-51. doi: 10.1037/a0024308.
9
Phonological similarity in the serial recall task hinders item recall, not just order.在序列回忆任务中,语音相似性会干扰项目回忆,而不仅仅是顺序。
Br J Psychol. 2022 Nov;113(4):1100-1120. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12575. Epub 2022 Jun 12.
10
Does collaboration help or hurt recall? The answer depends on working memory capacity.合作对记忆有帮助还是有损害?答案取决于工作记忆容量。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Mar;49(3):350-370. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001155. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Serial order in perception, memory, and action.感知、记忆和动作中的序列顺序。
Psychol Rev. 2021 Jan;128(1):1-44. doi: 10.1037/rev0000253. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
2
A meta-analytic review of collaborative inhibition and postcollaborative memory: Testing the predictions of the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis.协作抑制和协作后记忆的元分析综述:检验检索策略干扰假说的预测。
Psychol Bull. 2016 Nov;142(11):1141-1164. doi: 10.1037/bul0000071. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
3
Collaborative Memory: Cognitive Research and Theory.协作记忆:认知研究与理论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;5(6):649-63. doi: 10.1177/1745691610388763.
4
The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice.测试记忆的力量:基础研究及其对教育实践的启示。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;1(3):181-210. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x.
5
The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect.测试与重测对保持效果的影响:测试效应的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1432-63. doi: 10.1037/a0037559. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
6
Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory.为何分头行动比共同行动更胜一筹:记忆中的协同抑制效应存在多种机制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Mar;41(2):559-66. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000037. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
7
Collaboration changes both the content and the structure of memory: Building the architecture of shared representations.协作改变记忆的内容和结构:构建共享表示的架构。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Aug;143(4):1570-1584. doi: 10.1037/a0035974. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
8
Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals.提取练习在短时间间隔内的记忆增益。
Memory. 2015;23(3):403-19. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.889710. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
9
Both multiple-choice and short-answer quizzes enhance later exam performance in middle and high school classes.选择题和简答题测验都能提高初中和高中课堂上学生后续考试的成绩。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2014 Mar;20(1):3-21. doi: 10.1037/xap0000004. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
10
Retention-error patterns in complex alphanumeric serial-recall tasks.复杂字母数字序列回忆任务中的保持错误模式。
Memory. 2013;21(8):945-68. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.769607. Epub 2013 Mar 14.