Suppr超能文献

基于粪便免疫化学检测的筛查中息肉切除术后的结直肠癌风险

Colorectal cancer risk after removal of polyps in fecal immunochemical test based screening.

作者信息

van Toledo D E F W M, IJspeert J E G, Spaander M C W, Nagtegaal I D, van Leerdam M E, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Dekker E

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jul 5;61:102066. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102066. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy surveillance intervals are based on the predicted risk of metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) after polyp removal. However, risk estimation per polyp subtype is difficult due to the fact that many patients have multiple polyps. To enable risk estimation per polyp subtypes we examined the metachronous CRC risk of subgroups based on presence or absence of co-occurring findings.

METHODS

Using high-quality screening colonoscopies performed after a positive fecal immunochemical test between 2014 and 2020 within the Dutch CRC screening program, we applied Cox regression analysis to evaluate the association between findings at baseline colonoscopy and metachronous CRCs. For our primary outcome, we appointed each patient to unique subgroups based on removed polyp subtypes that were present or absent at baseline colonoscopy and used the groups without polyps as reference. High-risk subgroups were individuals with high-risk serrated polyps, defined as serrated polyp ≥10 mm, sessile serrated lesions with dysplasia, or traditional serrated adenomas, as well as high-risk adenomas, defined as adenoma ≥10 mm or containing high-grade dysplasia.

FINDINGS

In total 253,833 colonoscopies were included. Over a median follow-up of 36 months (IQR, 21-57), we identified 504 metachronous CRCs. Hazard ratios for metachronous CRC was 1.70 (95% CI, 1.07-2.69) for individuals with high-risk serrated polyps without high-risk adenomas, 1.22 (0.96-1.55) for individuals with high-risk adenomas without high-risk serrated polyps, and 2.00 (1.19-3.39) for individuals with high-risk serrated polyps and high-risk adenomas, compared to patients without polyps.

INTERPRETATION

Accounting for co-occurring findings, we observed an increased metachronous CRC risk for individuals that had high-risk serrated polyps with the presence of high-risk adenomas, or individuals with high-risk serrated polyps without high-risk adenomas. These findings could provide more evidence to support post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines.

FUNDING

None.

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查监测间隔基于息肉切除术后异时性结直肠癌(CRC)的预测风险。然而,由于许多患者有多个息肉,按息肉亚型进行风险评估很困难。为了能够按息肉亚型进行风险评估,我们根据是否存在并发发现来检查亚组的异时性CRC风险。

方法

利用2014年至2020年荷兰CRC筛查项目中粪便免疫化学检测呈阳性后进行的高质量筛查结肠镜检查,我们应用Cox回归分析来评估基线结肠镜检查结果与异时性CRC之间的关联。对于我们的主要结局,我们根据基线结肠镜检查时存在或不存在的切除息肉亚型将每位患者分配到独特的亚组,并将无息肉组作为对照。高危亚组包括患有高危锯齿状息肉的个体,定义为锯齿状息肉≥10毫米、伴有发育异常的无蒂锯齿状病变或传统锯齿状腺瘤,以及高危腺瘤,定义为腺瘤≥10毫米或含有高级别发育异常。

结果

共纳入253,833例结肠镜检查。在中位随访36个月(四分位间距,21 - 57个月)期间,我们识别出504例异时性CRC。与无息肉患者相比,无高危腺瘤的高危锯齿状息肉患者发生异时性CRC的风险比为1.70(95%置信区间,1.07 - 2.69),无高危锯齿状息肉的高危腺瘤患者为1.22(0.96 - 1.55),同时患有高危锯齿状息肉和高危腺瘤的患者为2.00(1.19 - 3.39)。

解读

考虑到并发发现,我们观察到患有高危锯齿状息肉且伴有高危腺瘤的个体,或患有高危锯齿状息肉但无高危腺瘤的个体,其异时性CRC风险增加。这些发现可为支持息肉切除术后监测指南提供更多证据。

资金来源

无。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7172/10388570/530f7a9d64f6/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验