Nutritional Epidemiology Observatory, Josué de Castro Nutrition Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho 373/CCS, bloco J, 2 andar, sala 29. Cidade Universitária, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-902, Brazil.
Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, 227 Savage Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 26;20(1):734. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03354-4.
Self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and weight measured in the first trimester are both used to estimate pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) but there is limited information on how they compare, especially in low- and middle-income countries, where access to a weight scale can be limited. Thus, the main goal of this study was to evaluate the agreement between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and weight measured during the first trimester of pregnancy among Brazilian women so as to assess whether self-reported pre-pregnancy weight is reliable and can be used for calculation of BMI and GWG.
Data from the Brazilian Maternal and Child Nutrition Consortium (BMCNC, n = 5563) and the National Food and Nutritional Surveillance System (SISVAN, n = 393,095) were used to evaluate the agreement between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and weights measured in three overlapping intervals (30-94, 30-60 and 30-45 days of pregnancy) and their impact in BMI classification. We calculated intraclass correlation and Lin's concordance coefficients, constructed Bland and Altman plots, and determined Kappa coefficient for the categories of BMI.
The mean of the differences between self-reported and measured weights was < 2 kg during the three intervals examined for BMCNC (1.42, 1.39 and 1.56 kg) and about 1 kg for SISVAN (1.0, 1.1 and 1.2 kg). Intraclass correlation and Lin's coefficient were > 0.90 for both datasets in all time intervals. Bland and Altman plots showed that the majority of the difference laid in the ±2 kg interval and that the differences did not vary according to measured first-trimester BMI. Kappa coefficient values were > 0.80 for both datasets at all intervals. Using self-reported pre-pregnancy or measured weight would change, in total, the classification of BMI in 15.9, 13.5, and 12.2% of women in the BMCNC and 12.1, 10.7, and 10.2% in the SISVAN, at 30-94, 30-60 and 30-45 days, respectively.
In Brazil, self-reported pre-pregnancy weight can be used for calculation of BMI and GWG when an early measurement of weight during pregnancy is not available. These results are especially important in a country where the majority of woman do not initiate prenatal care early in pregnancy.
自我报告的孕前体重和孕早期测量的体重都可用于估计孕前体重指数(BMI)和妊娠增重(GWG),但有关两者比较的信息有限,尤其是在获得体重秤的机会有限的中低收入国家。因此,本研究的主要目的是评估巴西女性自我报告的孕前体重与孕早期测量的体重之间的一致性,以评估自我报告的孕前体重是否可靠,是否可用于计算 BMI 和 GWG。
本研究使用巴西母婴营养联盟(BMCNC,n=5563)和国家食品和营养监测系统(SISVAN,n=393095)的数据,评估了自我报告的孕前体重与三个重叠时间段(妊娠 30-94、30-60 和 30-45 天)内测量的体重之间的一致性及其对 BMI 分类的影响。我们计算了组内相关系数和 Lin 一致性系数,绘制 Bland 和 Altman 图,并确定了 BMI 分类的 Kappa 系数。
在 BMCNC 研究中,自我报告和测量体重之间的差异平均值在三个时间段均小于 2kg(分别为 1.42、1.39 和 1.56kg),在 SISVAN 研究中约为 1kg(分别为 1.0、1.1 和 1.2kg)。在所有时间段内,两个数据集的组内相关系数和 Lin 系数均>0.90。Bland 和 Altman 图显示,大部分差异在±2kg 区间内,且差异不随测量的孕早期 BMI 而变化。在所有时间段内,两个数据集的 Kappa 系数值均>0.80。在 BMCNC 中,在 30-94、30-60 和 30-45 天,分别有 15.9%、13.5%和 12.2%的女性和 SISVAN 中 12.1%、10.7%和 10.2%的女性,使用自我报告的孕前体重或测量体重会改变 BMI 的分类。
在巴西,当无法获得孕早期体重的早期测量值时,自我报告的孕前体重可用于计算 BMI 和 GWG。在大多数女性在妊娠早期未及时进行产前检查的国家,这些结果尤为重要。