Suppr超能文献

混合觅食搜索:搜索多种类型目标的多个实例。

Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.

作者信息

Wolfe Jeremy M, Aizenman Avigael M, Boettcher Sage E P, Cain Matthew S

机构信息

Visual Attention Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Cambridge, MA, United States; Depts. of Radiology and Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Visual Attention Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Cambridge, MA, United States.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2016 Feb;119:50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 20.

Abstract

This paper introduces the "hybrid foraging" paradigm. In typical visual search tasks, observers search for one instance of one target among distractors. In hybrid search, observers search through visual displays for one instance of any of several types of target held in memory. In foraging search, observers collect multiple instances of a single target type from visual displays. Combining these paradigms, in hybrid foraging tasks observers search visual displays for multiple instances of any of several types of target (as might be the case in searching the kitchen for dinner ingredients or an X-ray for different pathologies). In the present experiment, observers held 8-64 target objects in memory. They viewed displays of 60-105 randomly moving photographs of objects and used the computer mouse to collect multiple targets before choosing to move to the next display. Rather than selecting at random among available targets, observers tended to collect items in runs of one target type. Reaction time (RT) data indicate searching again for the same item is more efficient than searching for any other targets, held in memory. Observers were trying to maximize collection rate. As a result, and consistent with optimal foraging theory, they tended to leave 25-33% of targets uncollected when moving to the next screen/patch. The pattern of RTs shows that while observers were collecting a target item, they had already begun searching memory and the visual display for additional targets, making the hybrid foraging task a useful way to investigate the interaction of visual and memory search.

摘要

本文介绍了“混合觅食”范式。在典型的视觉搜索任务中,观察者在干扰物中搜索一个目标的一个实例。在混合搜索中,观察者在视觉显示中搜索记忆中几种目标类型中任何一种的一个实例。在觅食搜索中,观察者从视觉显示中收集单个目标类型的多个实例。将这些范式结合起来,在混合觅食任务中,观察者在视觉显示中搜索几种目标类型中任何一种的多个实例(就像在厨房中寻找晚餐食材或在X光片中寻找不同病变时的情况)。在本实验中,观察者在记忆中保存8 - 64个目标物体。他们观看60 - 105张随机移动的物体照片显示,并在选择进入下一个显示之前使用电脑鼠标收集多个目标。观察者不是在可用目标中随机选择,而是倾向于连续收集一种目标类型的物品。反应时间(RT)数据表明,再次搜索相同物品比搜索记忆中的任何其他目标更有效。观察者试图使收集率最大化。因此,与最优觅食理论一致,当进入下一个屏幕/区域时,他们倾向于留下25 - 33%的目标未收集。反应时间模式表明,当观察者收集一个目标物品时,他们已经开始在记忆和视觉显示中搜索其他目标,这使得混合觅食任务成为研究视觉和记忆搜索相互作用的一种有用方法。

相似文献

1
Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.
Vision Res. 2016 Feb;119:50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
2
Hybrid foraging search in younger and older age.
Psychol Aging. 2019 Sep;34(6):805-820. doi: 10.1037/pag0000387. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
3
Hybrid value foraging: How the value of targets shapes human foraging behavior.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Apr;80(3):609-621. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1471-x.
4
You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Dec;41(6):1576-87. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000096. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
5
The role of object categories in hybrid visual and memory search.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Aug;143(4):1585-99. doi: 10.1037/a0036313. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
7
Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Feb;183:108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
Searching for the right word: Hybrid visual and memory search for words.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 May;77(4):1132-42. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0858-9.
9
Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Apr;81(3):637-653. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-01649-5.
10
The target effect: visual memory for unnamed search targets.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(11):2090-104. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.905611. Epub 2014 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding human visual foraging: a review.
Biol Cybern. 2025 Jul 23;119(4-6):20. doi: 10.1007/s00422-025-01020-6.
3
The impact of clock timing on VDT visual search performance under time constraint.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 15;15:1369920. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369920. eCollection 2024.
4
The effects of visual and auditory synchrony on human foraging.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Apr;86(3):909-930. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02840-z. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
5
The time course of visual foraging in the lifespan: Spatial scanning, organization search, and target processing.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):325-339. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02345-8. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
6
The association of targets modulates the search efficiency in multitarget searches.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Aug;85(6):1888-1904. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02771-9. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
7
Priming effects in inefficient visual search: Real, but transient.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jul;84(5):1417-1431. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02503-5. Epub 2022 May 16.
8
Foraging as sampling without replacement: A Bayesian statistical model for estimating biases in target selection.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jan 24;18(1):e1009813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009813. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Target value and prevalence influence visual foraging in younger and older age.
Vision Res. 2021 Sep;186:87-102. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 29.
10
Foraging behavior in visual search: A review of theoretical and mathematical models in humans and animals.
Psychol Res. 2022 Mar;86(2):331-349. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01499-1. Epub 2021 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

2
You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Dec;41(6):1576-87. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000096. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
3
Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):977-94. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000053. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
4
Searching for the right word: Hybrid visual and memory search for words.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 May;77(4):1132-42. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0858-9.
5
The role of object categories in hybrid visual and memory search.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Aug;143(4):1585-99. doi: 10.1037/a0036313. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
6
The influence of cognitive load on spatial search performance.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jan;76(1):49-63. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0575-1.
7
The invisible gorilla strikes again: sustained inattentional blindness in expert observers.
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1848-53. doi: 10.1177/0956797613479386. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
8
A bayesian optimal foraging model of human visual search.
Psychol Sci. 2012 Sep 1;23(9):1047-54. doi: 10.1177/0956797612440460. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
9
Saved by a log: how do humans perform hybrid visual and memory search?
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul 1;23(7):698-703. doi: 10.1177/0956797612443968. Epub 2012 May 22.
10
Optimal foraging in semantic memory.
Psychol Rev. 2012 Apr;119(2):431-40. doi: 10.1037/a0027373. Epub 2012 Feb 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验