• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过机器学习预测圆锥角膜交联术后两年视力和角膜曲率的模型开发与验证

Development and validation to predict visual acuity and keratometry two years after corneal crosslinking with progressive keratoconus by machine learning.

作者信息

Liu Yu, Shen Dan, Wang Hao-Yu, Qi Meng-Ying, Zeng Qing-Yan

机构信息

Aier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Aier Eye Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 3;10:1146529. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1146529. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2023.1146529
PMID:37534322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10393251/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To explore and validate the utility of machine learning (ML) methods using a limited sample size to predict changes in visual acuity and keratometry 2 years following corneal crosslinking (CXL) for progressive keratoconus.

METHODS

The study included all consecutive patients with progressive keratoconus who underwent CXL from July 2014 to December 2020, with a 2 year follow-up period before July 2022 to develop the model. Variables collected included patient demographics, visual acuity, spherical equivalence, and Pentacam parameters. Available case data were divided into training and testing data sets. Three ML models were evaluated based on their performance in predicting case corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and maximum keratometry (K) changes compared to actual values, as indicated by average root mean squared error (RMSE) and R-squared () values. Patients followed from July 2022 to December 2022 were included in the validation set.

RESULTS

A total of 277 eyes from 195 patients were included in training and testing sets and 43 eyes from 35 patients were included in the validation set. The baseline CDVA (26.7%) and the ratio of steep keratometry to flat keratometry (K/K; 13.8%) were closely associated with case CDVA changes. The baseline ratio of K to mean keratometry (K/K; 20.9%) was closely associated with case K changes. Using these metrics, the best-performing ML model was XGBoost, which produced predicted values closest to the actual values for both CDVA and K changes in testing set ( = 0.9993 and 0.9888) and validation set ( = 0.8956 and 0.8382).

CONCLUSION

Application of a ML approach using XGBoost, and incorporation of identifiable parameters, considerably improved variation prediction accuracy of both CDVA and K 2 years after CXL for treatment of progressive keratoconus.

摘要

目的

探讨并验证使用有限样本量的机器学习(ML)方法预测圆锥角膜交联术(CXL)治疗进行性圆锥角膜2年后视力和角膜曲率变化的效用。

方法

该研究纳入了2014年7月至2020年12月期间所有连续接受CXL治疗的进行性圆锥角膜患者,并在2022年7月之前进行了2年随访以建立模型。收集的变量包括患者人口统计学信息、视力、等效球镜度和Pentacam参数。可用病例数据分为训练集和测试集。基于三种ML模型预测病例矫正远视力(CDVA)和最大角膜曲率(K)变化与实际值相比的性能进行评估,以平均均方根误差(RMSE)和R平方()值表示。2022年7月至2022年12月随访的患者纳入验证集。

结果

训练集和测试集共纳入195例患者的277只眼,验证集纳入35例患者的43只眼。基线CDVA(26.7%)和陡峭角膜曲率与平坦角膜曲率之比(K/K;13.8%)与病例CDVA变化密切相关。基线K与平均角膜曲率之比(K/K;20.9%)与病例K变化密切相关。使用这些指标,表现最佳的ML模型是XGBoost,其在测试集(=0.9993和0.9888)和验证集(=0.8956和0.8382)中产生的预测值最接近CDVA和K变化的实际值。

结论

应用使用XGBoost的ML方法并纳入可识别参数,显著提高了CXL治疗进行性圆锥角膜2年后CDVA和K的变化预测准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23bf/10393251/ee0bb83781f1/fmed-10-1146529-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23bf/10393251/680e8a61882e/fmed-10-1146529-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23bf/10393251/c68bab0d45e2/fmed-10-1146529-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23bf/10393251/4c90233ebd2e/fmed-10-1146529-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23bf/10393251/ee0bb83781f1/fmed-10-1146529-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23bf/10393251/680e8a61882e/fmed-10-1146529-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23bf/10393251/c68bab0d45e2/fmed-10-1146529-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23bf/10393251/4c90233ebd2e/fmed-10-1146529-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23bf/10393251/ee0bb83781f1/fmed-10-1146529-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation to predict visual acuity and keratometry two years after corneal crosslinking with progressive keratoconus by machine learning.通过机器学习预测圆锥角膜交联术后两年视力和角膜曲率的模型开发与验证
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 3;10:1146529. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1146529. eCollection 2023.
2
Pulsed corneal crosslinking in the treatment of Keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.脉冲角膜交联术治疗圆锥角膜:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar;263(3):589-601. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06622-7. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
3
Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.经上皮角膜交联与角膜上皮瓣下角膜交联治疗进行性圆锥角膜的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 23;3(3):CD013512. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013512.pub2.
4
Transepithelial accelerated corneal crosslinking for keratoconus eyes with maximum keratometry values larger than 58 diopters.经上皮角膜交联术治疗最大角膜曲率值大于 58 屈光度的圆锥角膜眼。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Feb 1;48(2):208-214. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000733.
5
Conventional versus accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in the treatment of keratoconus.传统角膜胶原交联术与加速角膜胶原交联术治疗圆锥角膜的对比
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan-Feb;44(1):8-14. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12571. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
6
Topographic, corneal wavefront, and refractive outcomes 2 years after collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.交联治疗进展性圆锥角膜 2 年后的地形学、角膜前表面像差和屈光结果。
Cornea. 2014 Jan;33(1):43-8. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a9fbdf.
7
Accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus: Five-year results and predictors of visual and topographic outcomes.渐进性圆锥角膜中加速角膜胶原交联:5 年结果及视觉和地形学结果的预测因素。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;70(8):2930-2935. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2778_21.
8
The Outcome of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Patients with Advanced Progressive Keratoconus: A 2-Year Follow-up Study.晚期进行性圆锥角膜患者角膜胶原交联的结果:一项为期2年的随访研究。
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan-Mar;26(1):11-16. doi: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_101_18.
9
36-Month Outcomes of Mechanical and Transepithelial PTK Epithelium Removal Techniques Prior to Accelerated CXL for Progressive Keratoconus.渐进性圆锥角膜行加速交联术前机械和经上皮性 PTK 角膜上皮去除技术 36 个月的疗效观察。
J Refract Surg. 2022 Mar;38(3):191-200. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20220114-03. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
10
Long-term database analysis of conventional and accelerated crosslinked keratoconic mid-European eyes.中欧圆锥角膜患者常规交联和加速交联的长期数据库分析
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;256(6):1165-1172. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3955-3. Epub 2018 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual Risk Assessment and Prognostication of Outcomes After Corneal Cross-Linking.角膜交联术后个体风险评估及预后预测
J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 1;2025:3678453. doi: 10.1155/joph/3678453. eCollection 2025.
2
Digital transformation of care for keratoconus patients: ML modeling structural outcomes of corneal collagen cross-linking.圆锥角膜患者护理的数字化转型:角膜胶原交联的机器学习建模结构结果
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 4;12:1462653. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1462653. eCollection 2025.
3
Mitochondrial Quality Control Systems in Septic AKI: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.

本文引用的文献

1
Oxygen-supplemented transepithelial-accelerated corneal crosslinking with pulsed irradiation for progressive keratoconus: 1 year outcomes.脉冲照射补充氧的经上皮角膜交联术治疗进行性圆锥角膜:1 年结果。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Oct 1;48(10):1175-1182. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000952.
2
Inferring Retinal Degeneration-Related Genes Based on Xgboost.基于Xgboost推断视网膜变性相关基因
Front Mol Biosci. 2022 Feb 11;9:843150. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.843150. eCollection 2022.
3
Factors Affecting Visual Gain after Accelerated Crosslinking in Pediatric Keratoconic Cases.
脓毒症急性肾损伤中的线粒体质量控制系统:分子机制与治疗意义
Int J Med Sci. 2025 Mar 19;22(8):1852-1864. doi: 10.7150/ijms.107012. eCollection 2025.
4
Identifying Water-Salt Homeostasis and Inflammatory Response in Pathological Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: NT-proBNP-related lncRNAs and miRNAs as Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets.识别病理心脏手术相关急性肾损伤中的水盐稳态和炎症反应:NT-proBNP相关长链非编码RNA和微小RNA作为新型诊断生物标志物和治疗靶点
Int J Med Sci. 2025 Jan 21;22(4):845-855. doi: 10.7150/ijms.107589. eCollection 2025.
5
Unveiling the role of risk factors and predictive models in acute type-a aortic dissection surgery: OI downregulation and its association with immune disorders.揭示危险因素和预测模型在急性A型主动脉夹层手术中的作用:OI下调及其与免疫紊乱的关联。
Int J Med Sci. 2025 Jan 13;22(3):745-753. doi: 10.7150/ijms.104622. eCollection 2025.
6
Glycosphingolipids-Dependent Phospholipid Metabolism Enhances Cancer Initiation and Progression through SMPD1/GLTP/B3GALT4/ST8SIA6 Signaling Axis: A Novel Therapeutic Target.糖鞘脂依赖性磷脂代谢通过SMPD1/GLTP/B3GALT4/ST8SIA6信号轴增强癌症起始和进展:一个新的治疗靶点。
Int J Med Sci. 2025 Jan 6;22(3):604-615. doi: 10.7150/ijms.103834. eCollection 2025.
7
Spinal Metastasis Pain Surveillance: A Comprehensive Imaging-Based Tool Design for Evaluating Metastatic Burden and Guiding Therapeutic Strategies.脊柱转移瘤疼痛监测:一种基于影像学的综合工具设计,用于评估转移负担和指导治疗策略。
Int J Med Sci. 2025 Jan 13;22(3):708-715. doi: 10.7150/ijms.103916. eCollection 2025.
8
Artificial intelligence in corneal diseases: A narrative review.人工智能在角膜疾病中的应用:综述。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2024 Dec;47(6):102284. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2024.102284. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
9
Utility of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of keratoconus: a systematic review.人工智能在圆锥角膜诊断与管理中的应用:一项系统评价
Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2024 May 17;4:1380701. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2024.1380701. eCollection 2024.
小儿圆锥角膜病例中加速交联后影响视觉增益的因素。
Beyoglu Eye J. 2021 Dec 17;6(4):267-271. doi: 10.14744/bej.2021.15046. eCollection 2021.
4
Keratoconus: An updated review.圆锥角膜:更新综述。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2022 Jun;45(3):101559. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2021.101559. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
5
Predictive factors of the accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking outcomes in keratoconus.圆锥角膜经上皮角膜交联术治疗效果的预测因素。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02235-4.
6
Risk Factors for Progression of Keratoconus and Failure Rate After Corneal Cross-linking.圆锥角膜进展的危险因素和角膜交联术后的失败率。
J Refract Surg. 2021 Dec;37(12):816-823. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20210830-01. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
7
Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Subclinical Keratoconus: Systematic Review.用于检测亚临床圆锥角膜的机器学习算法:系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Dec 13;9(12):e27363. doi: 10.2196/27363.
8
Keratoconus Severity Classification Using Features Selection and Machine Learning Algorithms.使用特征选择和机器学习算法对圆锥角膜严重程度进行分类。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2021 Nov 16;2021:9979560. doi: 10.1155/2021/9979560. eCollection 2021.
9
Risk factors for keratoconus progression after treatment by accelerated cross-linking (A-CXL): A prospective 24-month study.加速交联(A-CXL)治疗后圆锥角膜进展的危险因素:一项为期24个月的前瞻性研究。
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2021 Jun;44(6):863-872. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2020.08.040. Epub 2021 May 28.
10
Fellow Eye as a Predictor for Keratoconus Progression Following Accelerated Corneal Cross-linking.《眼表在交联术后角膜扩张进展中的预测价值》。
J Refract Surg. 2021 Mar;37(3):186-191. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20201229-02. Epub 2021 Mar 18.