Suppr超能文献

多基因panel 及基因组检测中报告的 VUS 景观:是时候改变了。

The landscape of reported VUS in multi-gene panel and genomic testing: Time for a change.

机构信息

Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA; Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO; Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO; Genomic Medicine Center, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2023 Dec;25(12):100947. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100947. Epub 2023 Jul 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are a common result of diagnostic genetic testing and can be difficult to manage with potential misinterpretation and downstream costs, including time investment by clinicians. We investigated the rate of VUS reported on diagnostic testing via multi-gene panels (MGPs) and exome and genome sequencing (ES/GS) to measure the magnitude of uncertain results and explore ways to reduce their potentially detrimental impact.

METHODS

Rates of inconclusive results due to VUS were collected from over 1.5 million sequencing test results from 19 clinical laboratories in North America from 2020 to 2021.

RESULTS

We found a lower rate of inconclusive test results due to VUSs from ES/GS (22.5%) compared with MGPs (32.6%; P < .0001). For MGPs, the rate of inconclusive results correlated with panel size. The use of trios reduced inconclusive rates (18.9% vs 27.6%; P < .0001), whereas the use of GS compared with ES had no impact (22.2% vs 22.6%; P = ns).

CONCLUSION

The high rate of VUS observed in diagnostic MGP testing warrants examining current variant reporting practices. We propose several approaches to reduce reported VUS rates, while directing clinician resources toward important VUS follow-up.

摘要

目的

意义未明的变异(VUS)是诊断性基因检测的常见结果,可能由于潜在的误解和下游成本而难以管理,包括临床医生的时间投入。我们调查了通过多基因panel(MGPs)和外显子组和基因组测序(ES/GS)进行诊断性检测报告的 VUS 发生率,以衡量不确定结果的程度,并探索降低其潜在不利影响的方法。

方法

从 2020 年至 2021 年,我们从北美 19 个临床实验室的超过 150 万份测序测试结果中收集了由于 VUS 而导致的不确定结果的发生率。

结果

我们发现 ES/GS(22.5%)导致的不确定测试结果的发生率低于 MGPs(32.6%;P<.0001)。对于 MGPs,不确定结果的发生率与panel 大小相关。使用三联体降低了不确定的发生率(18.9% vs 27.6%;P<.0001),而与 ES 相比,使用 GS 没有影响(22.2% vs 22.6%;P=ns)。

结论

在诊断性 MGP 检测中观察到的高 VUS 发生率需要检查当前的变异报告实践。我们提出了几种方法来降低报告的 VUS 发生率,同时指导临床医生资源进行重要的 VUS 随访。

相似文献

1
The landscape of reported VUS in multi-gene panel and genomic testing: Time for a change.
Genet Med. 2023 Dec;25(12):100947. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100947. Epub 2023 Jul 30.
4
Understanding variants of uncertain significance in the era of multigene panels: Through the eyes of the patient.
J Genet Couns. 2019 Aug;28(4):878-886. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1130. Epub 2019 May 3.
5
Rates and Classification of Variants of Uncertain Significance in Hereditary Disease Genetic Testing.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2339571. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.39571.
7
Disclosure of cardiac variants of uncertain significance results in an exome cohort.
Clin Genet. 2018 May;93(5):1022-1029. doi: 10.1111/cge.13220. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
8
Hereditary cancer gene panel test reports: wide heterogeneity suggests need for standardization.
Genet Med. 2018 Nov;20(11):1438-1445. doi: 10.1038/gim.2018.23. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
9
The role of a multidisciplinary team in managing variants of uncertain clinical significance in prenatal genetic diagnosis.
Eur J Med Genet. 2023 Oct;66(10):104844. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2023.104844. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
10
Assessing management practices for variants of uncertain significance among genetic counselors in pediatrics.
J Genet Couns. 2024 Dec;33(6):1312-1322. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1860. Epub 2024 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

2
Exome analysis links kidney malformations to developmental disorders and reveals causal genes.
Nat Commun. 2025 Aug 7;16(1):7290. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62319-3.
3
Multiple domains of efficacy define the utility of genetic testing.
Pediatr Res. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-04289-2.
4
Multiplexed assays of variant effect for clinical variant interpretation.
Nat Rev Genet. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1038/s41576-025-00870-x.
6
Using Large Genomic Biobanks to Generate Insights into Genetic Kidney Disease.
Semin Nephrol. 2025 Jul 11:151651. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2025.151651.
7
Clinical Predictors of Inherited Breast Cancer at a Comprehensive Cancer Centre in Oman:
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2025 May 2;25(1):341-348. doi: 10.18295/2075-0528.2843.
10
Evaluation of Exome and Genome Sequencing for Critically Ill Pediatric Cardiac Patients.
Res Sq. 2025 May 6:rs.3.rs-6314694. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6314694/v1.

本文引用的文献

4
Improved provider preparedness through an 8-part genetics and genomic education program.
Genet Med. 2022 Jan;24(1):214-224. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
5
Variant interpretation using population databases: Lessons from gnomAD.
Hum Mutat. 2022 Aug;43(8):1012-1030. doi: 10.1002/humu.24309. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
6
Deep Phenotyping on Electronic Health Records Facilitates Genetic Diagnosis by Clinical Exomes.
Am J Hum Genet. 2018 Jul 5;103(1):58-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
8
Clinical Decision-Making in Patients with Variant of Uncertain Significance in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Genes.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(10):3067-3072. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5959-3. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
9
A Standardized DNA Variant Scoring System for Pathogenicity Assessments in Mendelian Disorders.
Hum Mutat. 2016 Jan;37(1):127-34. doi: 10.1002/humu.22918. Epub 2015 Oct 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验