Lenneis Anita, Das-Friebel Ahuti, Tang Nicole K Y, Sanborn Adam N, Lemola Sakari, Singmann Henrik, Wolke Dieter, von Mühlenen Adrian, Realo Anu
Department of Psychology, University of Warwick.
Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London.
Emotion. 2024 Mar;24(2):451-464. doi: 10.1037/emo0001268. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
Previous research has associated sleep with subjective well-being (SWB), but less is known about the underlying within-person processes. In the current study, we investigated how self-reported and actigraphy-measured sleep parameters (sleep onset latency, sleep duration, sleep satisfaction, social jetlag, and sleep efficiency) influence SWB (positive affect [PA], negative affect [NA], and life satisfaction [LS]) at the within- and between-person levels. Multilevel analyses of data from 109 university students who completed a 2-week experience sampling study revealed that higher within-person sleep satisfaction was a significant predictor of all three components of next day's SWB (s < .005). Higher between-person sleep satisfaction was also related to higher levels of PA and LS (s < .005), whereas shorter self-reported between-person sleep onset latency was associated with higher PA and LS, and lower NA (s < .05). However, longer actigraphy-measured within-person sleep onset latency was associated with higher next day's LS ( = .028). When including within- and between-person sleep parameters into the same models predicting SWB, only within- and between-person sleep satisfaction remained a significant predictor of all components of SWB. Additionally, we found an effect of higher self-reported within-person sleep onset latency on PA and of shorter self-reported within-person sleep duration on LS (s < .05). Our results indicate that the evaluative component of sleep-sleep satisfaction-is most consistently linked with SWB. Thus, sleep interventions that are successful in not only altering sleep patterns but also enhancing sleep satisfaction may stand a better chance at improving students' SWB. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
先前的研究已将睡眠与主观幸福感(SWB)联系起来,但对于其潜在的个体内部过程却知之甚少。在当前的研究中,我们调查了自我报告和通过活动记录仪测量的睡眠参数(入睡潜伏期、睡眠时间、睡眠满意度、社会时差和睡眠效率)如何在个体内部和个体之间的层面上影响主观幸福感(积极情绪[PA]、消极情绪[NA]和生活满意度[LS])。对109名完成了为期两周体验抽样研究的大学生的数据进行的多层次分析表明,更高的个体内部睡眠满意度是第二天主观幸福感所有三个组成部分的显著预测因素(p <.005)。更高的个体之间睡眠满意度也与更高水平的积极情绪和生活满意度相关(p <.005),而自我报告的个体之间入睡潜伏期较短与更高的积极情绪和生活满意度以及更低的消极情绪相关(p <.05)。然而,通过活动记录仪测量的更长的个体内部入睡潜伏期与第二天更高的生活满意度相关(p =.028)。当将个体内部和个体之间的睡眠参数纳入预测主观幸福感的同一模型时,只有个体内部和个体之间的睡眠满意度仍然是主观幸福感所有组成部分的显著预测因素。此外,我们发现自我报告的更长的个体内部入睡潜伏期对积极情绪有影响,而自我报告的更短的个体内部睡眠时间对生活满意度有影响(p <.05)。我们的结果表明,睡眠的评价成分——睡眠满意度——与主观幸福感的联系最为一致。因此,不仅成功改变睡眠模式而且提高睡眠满意度的睡眠干预措施可能更有机会改善学生的主观幸福感。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)