• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回顾性队列研究:直接面向消费者的遗传筛查在遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌中的局限性。

Retrospective Cohort Study on the Limitations of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Screening in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

机构信息

Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.

Division of Hematology-Oncology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.

出版信息

JCO Precis Oncol. 2023 Aug;7:e2200695. doi: 10.1200/PO.22.00695.

DOI:10.1200/PO.22.00695
PMID:37535880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10581610/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Among cancer predisposition genes, most direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests evaluate three Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) founder mutations in , which represent a small proportion of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PLPV) in cancer predisposing genes. In this study, we investigate PLPV in and other cancer predisposition genes that are missed by testing only AJ founder mutations.

METHODS

Individuals were referred to genetic testing for personal diagnoses of breast and/or ovarian cancer (clinical cohort) or were self-referred (nonindication-based cohort). There were 348,692 participants in the clinical cohort and 7,636 participants in the nonindication-based cohort. Both cohorts were analyzed for AJ founder mutations. Full sequence analysis was done for PLPV in , , , , , , , , , (truncating variants), , , , , , , and 22 other genes.

RESULTS

AJ founder mutations accounted for 10.8% and 29.7% of PLPV in the clinical and nonindication-based cohorts, respectively. AJ founder mutations accounted for 89.9% of PLPV in those of full AJ descent, but only 69.6% of those of partial AJ descent. In total, 0.5% of all individuals had a AJ founder variant, while 7.7% had PLPV in a high-risk breast/ovarian cancer gene. For non-AJ individuals, limiting evaluation to the AJ founder mutations missed >90% of mutations in actionable cancer risk genes. Secondary analysis revealed a false-positive rate of 69% for PLPV outside of non-AJ founder mutations.

CONCLUSION

DTC genetic testing misses >90% of PLPV in individuals of non-AJ ancestry and about 10% of PLPV among AJ individuals. There is a high false-positivity rate for non-AJ PLPV with DTC genetic testing.

摘要

目的

在癌症易感基因中,大多数直接面向消费者(DTC)的基因检测评估三个阿什肯纳兹犹太人(AJ)创始人突变,这仅代表癌症易感基因中致病性或可能致病性变异(PLPV)的一小部分。在这项研究中,我们研究了仅通过检测 AJ 创始人突变而错过的 和其他癌症易感基因中的 PLPV。

方法

个体因个人诊断乳腺癌和/或卵巢癌(临床队列)或自我转诊(非指征性队列)而被转介进行基因检测。临床队列中有 348692 名参与者,非指征性队列中有 7636 名参与者。两个队列均分析了 AJ 创始人突变。对 、、、、、、、、、(截断变异)、、、、、、、和 22 个其他基因中的 PLPV 进行了全序列分析。

结果

AJ 创始人突变分别占临床和非指征性队列中 PLPV 的 10.8%和 29.7%。AJ 创始人突变占完全 AJ 血统的 PLPV 的 89.9%,但仅占部分 AJ 血统的 69.6%。总的来说,所有个体中有 0.5%携带 AJ 创始人变体,而 7.7%携带高风险乳腺癌/卵巢癌基因中的 PLPV。对于非 AJ 个体,将评估仅限于 AJ 创始人 突变会导致 >90%可操作的癌症风险基因中的突变被遗漏。二次分析显示,非 AJ 创始人突变之外的 PLPV 的假阳性率为 69%。

结论

DTC 基因检测会遗漏 >90%非 AJ 血统个体中的 PLPV 以及 AJ 个体中约 10%的 PLPV。DTC 基因检测对非 AJ PLPV 的假阳性率较高。

相似文献

1
Retrospective Cohort Study on the Limitations of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Screening in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.回顾性队列研究:直接面向消费者的遗传筛查在遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌中的局限性。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2023 Aug;7:e2200695. doi: 10.1200/PO.22.00695.
2
Prevalence of nonfounder BRCA1/2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish patients presenting for genetic testing at a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer center.在遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌中心进行基因检测的阿什肯纳兹犹太裔患者中,非胚系 BRCA1/2 突变的流行率。
Cancer. 2019 Mar 1;125(5):690-697. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31856. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
3
Incidence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 non-founder mutations in patients of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry.阿什肯纳兹犹太裔患者中BRCA1和BRCA2非始祖突变的发生率。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jan;149(1):223-7. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3218-x. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
4
Cancer Susceptibility Genetic Testing in a High-Risk Cohort of Urban Ashkenazi Jewish Individuals.城市阿什肯纳兹犹太高危人群中的癌症易感性基因检测
J Genet Couns. 2018 Dec;27(6):1405-1410. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0269-x. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
5
Screening for BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, BRIP1, RAD50, and CDH1 mutations in high-risk Finnish BRCA1/2-founder mutation-negative breast and/or ovarian cancer individuals.在高危芬兰 BRCA1/2 种系突变阴性的乳腺癌和/或卵巢癌个体中筛查 BRCA1、BRCA2、CHEK2、PALB2、BRIP1、RAD50 和 CDH1 突变。
Breast Cancer Res. 2011 Feb 28;13(1):R20. doi: 10.1186/bcr2832.
6
Extended genetic analysis and tumor characteristics in over 4600 women with suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.对 4600 多名疑似遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌的女性进行了扩展的基因分析和肿瘤特征分析。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Aug 10;23(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11229-y.
7
Genetic Predisposition to Breast Cancer Due to Mutations Other Than BRCA1 and BRCA2 Founder Alleles Among Ashkenazi Jewish Women.非 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 种系突变导致的阿什肯纳兹犹太裔妇女乳腺癌遗传易感性。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;3(12):1647-1653. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1996.
8
High frequency of pathogenic non-founder germline mutations in and in families with breast and ovarian cancer in a founder population.在一个奠基者群体中,乳腺癌和卵巢癌家族中BRCA1和BRCA2致病性非奠基者种系突变的高频率。
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2018 Jun 5;16:12. doi: 10.1186/s13053-018-0094-0. eCollection 2018.
9
BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations are frequently demonstrated in both high-risk pancreatic cancer screening and pancreatic cancer cohorts.在高危胰腺癌筛查队列和胰腺癌队列中,经常能检测到BRCA1和BRCA2种系突变。
Cancer. 2014 Jul 1;120(13):1960-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28662. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
10
Genetic screening results of individuals with high risk BRCA-related breast/ovarian cancer in Trakya region of Turkey.土耳其特拉基亚地区高危 BRCA 相关乳腺癌/卵巢癌个体的遗传筛查结果。
J BUON. 2020 May-Jun;25(3):1337-1347.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetics of Congenital Heart Disease: A Narrative Review of Challenges and Strategies in Identifying Novel Genes.先天性心脏病的遗传学:关于鉴定新基因的挑战与策略的叙述性综述
Cureus. 2025 Sep 5;17(9):e91674. doi: 10.7759/cureus.91674. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Experience using conventional compared to ancestry-based population descriptors in clinical genomics laboratories.临床基因组学实验室中使用传统人群描述符与基于血统的人群描述符的经验。
Am J Hum Genet. 2025 Mar 6;112(3):481-491. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.01.008. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
3
Challenges in Implementing Comprehensive Precision Medicine Screening for Ovarian Cancer.实施卵巢癌综合精准医学筛查面临的挑战。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Dec 18;31(12):8023-8038. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31120592.
4
The NHS England Jewish BRCA Testing Programme: overview after first year of implementation (2023-2024).英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)英格兰犹太裔BRCA检测项目:实施第一年(2023 - 2024年)后的概述
J Med Genet. 2025 Jan 27;62(2):69-73. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2024-110390.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating Web-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests for Cancer Susceptibility.评估基于网络的直接面向消费者的癌症易感性基因检测
JCO Precis Oncol. 2020 Mar 5;4. doi: 10.1200/PO.19.00317. eCollection 2020.
2
Use of SNP chips to detect rare pathogenic variants: retrospective, population based diagnostic evaluation.使用 SNP 芯片检测罕见的致病性变异:回顾性、基于人群的诊断评估。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:n214. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n214.
3
Comparison of Universal Genetic Testing vs Guideline-Directed Targeted Testing for Patients With Hereditary Cancer Syndrome.遗传性癌症综合征患者的通用基因检测与指南指导的靶向检测比较。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Feb 1;7(2):230-237. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6252.
4
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing.直接面向消费者的基因检测。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 16;367:l5688. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5688.
5
How Should Patients and Providers Interpret the US Food and Drug Administration's Regulatory Language for Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests?患者和医疗服务提供者应如何解读美国食品药品监督管理局针对直接面向消费者的基因检测的监管语言?
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct 1;37(28):2514-2517. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01418. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
6
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: The Implications of the US FDA's First Marketing Authorization for BRCA Mutation Testing.直接面向消费者的基因检测:美国食品药品监督管理局首次批准BRCA突变检测上市的影响
JAMA. 2018 Jun 19;319(23):2377-2378. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5330.
7
False-positive results released by direct-to-consumer genetic tests highlight the importance of clinical confirmation testing for appropriate patient care.直接面向消费者的基因检测产生的假阳性结果强调了为适当的患者护理进行临床确认检测的重要性。
Genet Med. 2018 Dec;20(12):1515-1521. doi: 10.1038/gim.2018.38. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
8
Mutational spectrum in a worldwide study of 29,700 families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.BRCA1 或 BRCA2 突变 29700 个家系的世界性研究中的突变谱。
Hum Mutat. 2018 May;39(5):593-620. doi: 10.1002/humu.23406. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
9
Genetic Predisposition to Breast Cancer Due to Mutations Other Than BRCA1 and BRCA2 Founder Alleles Among Ashkenazi Jewish Women.非 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 种系突变导致的阿什肯纳兹犹太裔妇女乳腺癌遗传易感性。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;3(12):1647-1653. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1996.
10
Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.Sherloc:ACMG-AMP 变异分类标准的全面细化。
Genet Med. 2017 Oct;19(10):1105-1117. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.37. Epub 2017 May 11.