Ultrasound Medical Laboratory, Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212002, China.
School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China.
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 3;13(1):12604. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39747-6.
The most common BRAF mutation is thymine (T) to adenine (A) missense mutation in nucleotide 1796 (T1796A, V600E). The BRAF gene encodes a protein-dependent kinase (PDK), which is a key component of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway and essential for controlling cell proliferation, differentiation, and death. The BRAF mutation causes PDK to be activated improperly and continuously, resulting in abnormal proliferation and differentiation in PTC. Based on elastography ultrasound (US) radiomic features, this study seeks to create and validate six distinct machine learning algorithms to predict BRAF mutation in PTC patients prior to surgery. This study employed routine US strain elastography image data from 138 PTC patients. The patients were separated into two groups: those who did not have the BRAF mutation (n = 75) and those who did have the mutation (n = 63). The patients were randomly assigned to one of two data sets: training (70%), or validation (30%). From strain elastography US images, a total of 479 radiomic features were retrieved. Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (PCC) and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) with stratified tenfold cross-validation were used to decrease the features. Based on selected radiomic features, six machine learning algorithms including support vector machine with the linear kernel (SVM_L), support vector machine with radial basis function kernel (SVM_RBF), logistic regression (LR), Naïve Bayes (NB), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were compared to predict the possibility of BRAF. The accuracy (ACC), the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPEC), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves of the machine learning algorithms were used to evaluate their performance. ① The machine learning algorithms' diagnostic performance depended on 27 radiomic features. ② AUCs for NB, KNN, LDA, LR, SVM_L, and SVM_RBF were 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.91), 0.87 (95% CI 0.73-0.95), 0.91(95% CI 0.79-0.98), 0.92 (95% CI 0.80-0.98), 0.93 (95% CI 0.80-0.98), and 0.98 (95% CI 0.88-1.00), respectively. ③ There was a significant difference in echogenicity,vertical and horizontal diameter ratios, and elasticity between PTC patients with BRAF and PTC patients without BRAF. Machine learning algorithms based on US elastography radiomic features are capable of predicting the likelihood of BRAF in PTC patients, which can assist physicians in identifying the risk of BRAF in PTC patients. Among the six machine learning algorithms, the support vector machine with radial basis function (SVM_RBF) achieved the best ACC (0.93), AUC (0.98), SEN (0.95), SPEC (0.90), PPV (0.91), and NPV (0.95).
最常见的 BRAF 突变是核苷酸 1796 处的胸腺嘧啶(T)到腺嘌呤(A)错义突变(T1796A,V600E)。BRAF 基因编码一种蛋白依赖性激酶(PDK),它是丝裂原活化蛋白激酶途径的关键组成部分,对控制细胞增殖、分化和死亡至关重要。BRAF 突变导致 PDK 异常和持续激活,导致 PTC 中异常增殖和分化。基于超声弹性成像(US)放射组学特征,本研究旨在创建和验证六种不同的机器学习算法,以在手术前预测 PTC 患者的 BRAF 突变。本研究采用了 138 名 PTC 患者的常规 US 应变弹性成像图像数据。将患者分为两组:未发生 BRAF 突变的患者(n=75)和发生突变的患者(n=63)。患者被随机分配到两个数据集之一:训练集(70%)或验证集(30%)。从应变弹性 US 图像中提取了 479 个放射组学特征。使用 Pearson 相关系数(PCC)和基于分层十折交叉验证的递归特征消除(RFE)来减少特征。基于选定的放射组学特征,比较了包括带有线性核的支持向量机(SVM_L)、带有径向基函数核的支持向量机(SVM_RBF)、逻辑回归(LR)、朴素贝叶斯(NB)、K-最近邻(KNN)和线性判别分析(LDA)在内的六种机器学习算法,以预测 BRAF 的可能性。使用准确性(ACC)、曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度(SEN)、特异性(SPEC)、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、决策曲线分析(DCA)和机器学习算法的校准曲线来评估其性能。①机器学习算法的诊断性能取决于 27 个放射组学特征。② NB、KNN、LDA、LR、SVM_L 和 SVM_RBF 的 AUC 分别为 0.80(95%置信区间 [CI]:0.65-0.91)、0.87(95% CI 0.73-0.95)、0.91(95% CI 0.79-0.98)、0.92(95% CI 0.80-0.98)、0.93(95% CI 0.80-0.98)和 0.98(95% CI 0.88-1.00)。③ BRAF 阳性和 BRAF 阴性 PTC 患者之间存在回声强度、垂直和水平直径比以及弹性的显著差异。基于 US 弹性成像放射组学特征的机器学习算法能够预测 PTC 患者 BRAF 的可能性,这可以帮助医生识别 PTC 患者 BRAF 的风险。在六种机器学习算法中,带有径向基函数的支持向量机(SVM_RBF)获得了最佳的 ACC(0.93)、AUC(0.98)、SEN(0.95)、SPEC(0.90)、PPV(0.91)和 NPV(0.95)。