University College London, London, UK.
King's College London, London, UK.
J Parkinsons Dis. 2023;13(6):1011-1033. doi: 10.3233/JPD-230051.
Multi-arm, multi-stage (MAMS) platform trials can accelerate the identification of disease-modifying treatments for Parkinson's disease (PD) but there is no current consensus on the optimal outcome measures (OM) for this approach.
To provide an up-to-date inventory of OM for disease-modifying PD trials, and a framework for future selection of OM for such trials.
As part of the Edmond J Safra Accelerating Clinical Trials in Parkinson Disease (EJS ACT-PD) initiative, an expert group with Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) representatives' input reviewed and evaluated available evidence on OM for potential use in trials to delay progression of PD. Each OM was ranked based on aspects such as validity, sensitivity to change, participant burden and practicality for a multi-site trial. Review of evidence and expert opinion led to the present inventory.
An extensive inventory of OM was created, divided into: general, motor and non-motor scales, diaries and fluctuation questionnaires, cognitive, disability and health-related quality of life, capability, quantitative motor, wearable and digital, combined, resource use, imaging and wet biomarkers, and milestone-based. A framework for evaluation of OM is presented to update the inventory in the future. PPIE input highlighted the need for OM which reflect their experience of disease progression and are applicable to diverse populations and disease stages.
We present a range of OM, classified according to a transparent framework, to aid selection of OM for disease-modifying PD trials, whilst allowing for inclusion or re-classification of relevant OM as new evidence emerges.
多臂、多阶段(MAMS)平台试验可以加速帕金森病(PD)的治疗方法的发现,但目前对于这种方法的最佳疗效指标(OM)尚未达成共识。
提供一个用于帕金森病治疗方法的改变的临床试验的最新疗效指标清单,并为未来此类试验的疗效指标选择提供框架。
作为埃德蒙·J·萨夫拉帕金森病加速临床试验(EJS ACT-PD)倡议的一部分,一个有患者和公众参与和参与(PPIE)代表的专家小组,审查和评估了用于潜在试验的疗效指标的现有证据,以延迟 PD 的进展。每个疗效指标都根据有效性、对变化的敏感性、参与者负担和多地点试验的实用性等方面进行了排名。对证据和专家意见的审查导致了目前的清单。
创建了一个广泛的疗效指标清单,分为:一般、运动和非运动量表、日记和波动问卷、认知、残疾和健康相关生活质量、能力、定量运动、可穿戴和数字、综合、资源利用、成像和湿生物标志物以及基于里程碑的。提出了一个评估疗效指标的框架,以便将来更新清单。PPIE 的输入强调需要疗效指标来反映他们对疾病进展的经验,并且适用于不同的人群和疾病阶段。
我们提出了一系列疗效指标,根据一个透明的框架进行分类,以帮助选择用于改变帕金森病的临床试验的疗效指标,同时允许随着新证据的出现,包括或重新分类相关的疗效指标。