Duits Nils, Overdulve Carina, Kempes Maaike
Netherlands Institute of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology (NIFP), Utrecht, Netherlands.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 20;14:1165279. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1165279. eCollection 2023.
Violent extremism risk assessments of individuals suspected or convicted of terrorism are relevant for legal decisions, in prison and probation settings, and in inter-professional risk collaboration. These risk assessment reports by professionals should be applicable to and usable for the different judicial contexts. Informal and formal clinical practice evaluations, in the form of practitioners feedback and standardised evaluation of professional violent extremism risk reports are needed to gain insight in the use and quality of violent extremism risk assessments.
In this study we examined how forensic professionals from three different countries (Sweden, Belgium and the Netherlands) use the VERA-2R in different judicial contexts. We also investigated which organizational aspects are important for the use of the VERA-2R. We focused on the perspective of the forensic professionals and their judicial organisations. We did a standardised survey among 86 VERA-2R trained professionals and a standardised interview with 20 executives and managers of organizations working with the VERA-2R.
This study showed that professionals find the VERA-2R useful for structuring information and speaking a common risk language. However, using the VERA-2R comes with a variety of challenges, both on the professional and organisational level. VERA-2R trained professionals had few opportunities to use the instrument and when they did, they were not always offered regular supervision, intervision and booster training. Also, organisational issues in collaboration between judicial partner organisations and the lack of risk transfer information to professionals came to light.
More research on the topic of risk transfer is needed. Policy implications are advised, for example the development of booster trainings, more organizational support, regulations on re-assessments, providing expertise and knowledge to indirect stakeholders and clear writing guidelines.
对涉嫌或被判犯有恐怖主义罪行的个人进行暴力极端主义风险评估,对于法律决策、监狱和缓刑环境以及跨专业风险协作都具有重要意义。专业人员撰写的这些风险评估报告应适用于不同的司法环境并可供其使用。需要通过从业者反馈和对专业暴力极端主义风险报告的标准化评估等形式,进行非正式和正式的临床实践评估,以深入了解暴力极端主义风险评估的使用情况和质量。
在本研究中,我们考察了来自三个不同国家(瑞典、比利时和荷兰)的法医专业人员如何在不同司法环境中使用VERA - 2R。我们还调查了哪些组织方面对于VERA - 2R的使用很重要。我们关注法医专业人员及其司法组织的观点。我们对86名接受过VERA - 2R培训的专业人员进行了标准化调查,并对20名使用VERA - 2R的组织高管和经理进行了标准化访谈。
本研究表明,专业人员发现VERA - 2R有助于整理信息并使用共同的风险语言。然而,使用VERA - 2R在专业和组织层面都面临各种挑战。接受过VERA - 2R培训的专业人员使用该工具的机会很少,而且当他们使用时,并不总是能得到定期的监督、相互监督和强化培训。此外,司法伙伴组织之间协作中的组织问题以及缺乏向专业人员传递风险信息的情况也暴露出来。
需要对风险转移这一主题进行更多研究。建议出台政策,例如开展强化培训、提供更多组织支持、制定重新评估的规定、向间接利益相关者提供专业知识以及明确撰写指南。