• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

六项认知障碍测试(6-CIT)作为一种认知筛查工具的准确性:急诊科环境中的最佳截断水平。

Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)'s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting.

作者信息

Salis Francesco, Pili Daniela, Collu Manuel, Serchisu Luca, Laconi Rosanna, Mandas Antonella

机构信息

Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.

University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria" of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 21;10:1186502. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1186502. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2023.1186502
PMID:37547596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10401263/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, elderly patients represent a significant number of accesses to the Emergency Department (ED). Working rhythms do not allow to perform complete cognitive analysis, which would, however, be useful for the health care. This study aims to define the optimal cut-off values of the six-item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) as a cognitive screening tool in ED.

METHODS

This study included 215 subjects, evaluated at the Emergency Department of the University Hospital of Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy, from July to December 2021. The accuracy of 6-CIT as a cognitive screening tool was assessed by comparison with Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE).

RESULTS

The correlation coefficient between the two tests was -0.836 (CI: -0.87 to -0.79;  < 0.0001), and 6-CIT showed AUC = 0.947 (CI: 0.908-0.973;  < 0.0001). The 8/9 6-CIT cut-off score presented 86.76% sensitivity (CI: 76.4-93.8) and 91.84% specificity (CI: 86.2-95.7), and Youden index for this score was 0.786.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that 6-CIT is a reliable cognitive screening tool in ED, offering excellent sensitivity and specificity with a 8/9 points cut-off score.

摘要

背景

如今,老年患者占急诊室(ED)就诊人数的很大一部分。工作节奏不允许进行全面的认知分析,然而,这对医疗保健是有用的。本研究旨在确定六项认知障碍测试(6-CIT)作为急诊室认知筛查工具的最佳临界值。

方法

本研究纳入了215名受试者,于2021年7月至12月在意大利卡利亚里蒙塞拉托大学医院急诊室进行评估。通过与简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)比较,评估6-CIT作为认知筛查工具的准确性。

结果

两项测试之间的相关系数为-0.836(CI:-0.87至-0.79;<0.0001),6-CIT的AUC为0.947(CI:0.908-0.973;<0.0001)。6-CIT的8/9临界值分数的灵敏度为86.76%(CI:76.4-93.8),特异度为91.84%(CI:86.2-95.7),该分数的约登指数为0.786。

结论

我们的研究表明,6-CIT是急诊室可靠的认知筛查工具,8/9分的临界值分数具有出色的灵敏度和特异度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3323/10401263/32b0e3d06a64/fmed-10-1186502-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3323/10401263/2f488fa90bb0/fmed-10-1186502-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3323/10401263/32b0e3d06a64/fmed-10-1186502-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3323/10401263/2f488fa90bb0/fmed-10-1186502-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3323/10401263/32b0e3d06a64/fmed-10-1186502-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)'s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting.六项认知障碍测试(6-CIT)作为一种认知筛查工具的准确性:急诊科环境中的最佳截断水平。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 21;10:1186502. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1186502. eCollection 2023.
2
Validation of the 6-Item Cognitive Impairment Test and the 4AT test for combined delirium and dementia screening in older Emergency Department attendees.验证 6 项认知障碍测试和 4AT 测试在老年急诊科就诊者中联合用于谵妄和痴呆筛查的有效性。
Age Ageing. 2018 Jan 1;47(1):61-68. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx149.
3
The Six Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) as a screening test for dementia: comparison with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).六项认知障碍测试(6-CIT)作为痴呆症的筛查测试:与简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)的比较。
Curr Aging Sci. 2010 Jul;3(2):138-42. doi: 10.2174/1874609811003020138.
4
5
CAM-ICU may not be the optimal screening tool for early delirium screening in older emergency department patients: a prospective cohort study.CAM-ICU 可能不是老年急诊科患者早期谵妄筛查的最佳筛查工具:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;26(6):428-432. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000587.
6
Is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test better suited than the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) detection among people aged over 60? Meta-analysis.在60岁以上人群的轻度认知障碍(MCI)检测中,蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)测试是否比简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)更适用?荟萃分析。
Psychiatr Pol. 2016 Oct 31;50(5):1039-1052. doi: 10.12740/PP/45368.
7
Screening and case finding tools for the detection of dementia. Part I: evidence-based meta-analysis of multidomain tests.用于痴呆检测的筛查和病例发现工具。第一部分:多领域测试的基于证据的荟萃分析。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;18(9):759-82. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181cdecb8.
8
An evaluation of two screening tools for cognitive impairment in older emergency department patients.对两种用于老年急诊科患者认知障碍筛查工具的评估。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jul;12(7):612-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.01.017.
9
A score based on screening tests to differentiate mild cognitive impairment from subjective memory complaints.基于筛查测试的分数,用于区分轻度认知障碍和主观记忆主诉。
Neurol Int. 2013 Sep 5;5(3):e16. doi: 10.4081/ni.2013.e16. eCollection 2013.
10
Evaluation of the Ottawa 3DY as a screening tool for cognitive impairment in older emergency department patients.评估渥太华 3DY 作为老年急诊科患者认知障碍筛查工具的效果。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;38(12):2545-2551. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.12.036. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Sarcopenia association with physical and psychological indices in community-dwelling aged population, Birjand Longitudinal Aging Study (BLAS).社区居住老年人群中肌肉减少症与身体和心理指标的关联,比尔詹德纵向衰老研究(BLAS)
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Jun 28;37(1):198. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-03072-x.
2
The Italian guideline on diagnosis and treatment of dementia and mild cognitive impairment.《意大利痴呆和轻度认知障碍诊断与治疗指南》
Age Ageing. 2024 Nov 1;53(11). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae250.
3
Sex Differences in Elderly People's Sleep: A Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) predicts long-term mortality in old type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a 13-year follow-up study.多维预后指数 (MPI) 可预测老年 2 型糖尿病患者的长期死亡率:一项长达 13 年的随访研究。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2024 Jan;47(1):191-200. doi: 10.1007/s40618-023-02135-y. Epub 2023 Jun 18.
2
Physical Performance and Falling Risk Are Associated with Five-Year Mortality in Older Adults: An Observational Cohort Study.体能表现和跌倒风险与老年人五年死亡率相关:一项观察性队列研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 17;59(5):964. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050964.
3
STOPP/START Anti-aggregation and Anticoagulation Alerts in Atrial Fibrillation.
老年人睡眠的性别差异:一项横断面研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Oct 9;60(10):1654. doi: 10.3390/medicina60101654.
4
A protocol to determine the acceptability and feasibility of a pilot intervention emergency department virtual observation unit fall prevention program.一项用于确定试点干预急诊科虚拟观察单元跌倒预防项目的可接受性和可行性的方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 May 18;10(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01502-7.
5
Factors affecting subsequent dose of COVID-19 vaccine uptake based on BASNEF model among older adults.基于 BASNEF 模型的老年人 COVID-19 疫苗后续剂量接种影响因素。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08903-8.
6
Diabetes mellitus, malnutrition, and sarcopenia: The bond is not explained by bioelectrical impedance analysis in older adults.糖尿病、营养不良和肌肉减少症:生物电阻抗分析无法解释老年人之间的这种关联。
J Med Life. 2023 Aug;16(8):1170-1177. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0173.
7
Orthogeriatric Assessment of the Elderly Patient with Fragility Hip Fracture: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Study.老年脆性髋部骨折患者的骨科老年评估:一项前瞻性研究的初步结果
J Pers Med. 2023 Jul 14;13(7):1138. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071138.
STOPP/START 心房颤动中的抗聚集和抗凝警报。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2023;21(3):205-210. doi: 10.2174/1570161121666230418163016.
4
Frailty and comorbidity burden in Atrial Fibrillation.心房颤动中的虚弱和合并症负担。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 9;11:1134453. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1134453. eCollection 2023.
5
Anemia in Elderly Patients-The Impact of Hemoglobin Cut-Off Levels on Geriatric Domains.老年患者贫血——血红蛋白临界值对老年领域的影响。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 5;13(2):191. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13020191.
6
Mini-Mental State Examination: Optimal Cut-Off Levels for Mild and Severe Cognitive Impairment.简易精神状态检查表:轻度和重度认知障碍的最佳临界值水平
Geriatrics (Basel). 2023 Jan 12;8(1):12. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics8010012.
7
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment: Application and correlations in a real-life cross-sectional study.综合老年评估:在一项现实生活横断面研究中的应用及相关性
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 13;9:984046. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.984046. eCollection 2022.
8
Optimal Emergency Department Care Practices for Persons Living With Dementia: A Scoping Review.优化痴呆患者的急诊护理实践:范围综述。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Aug;23(8):1314.e1-1314.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.05.024.
9
Emergency Department Communication in Persons Living With Dementia and Care Partners: A Scoping Review.痴呆症患者及其照护伙伴的急诊科沟通:范围综述。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Aug;23(8):1313.e15-1313.e46. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.02.024.
10
Nutritional Status and Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Elderly.老年人的营养状况与潜在不适当用药
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 16;11(12):3465. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123465.