Department of Microbiology, Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Agriculture, Biomedicine and Environment, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
Health Social Sciences Cluster, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore.
Pain. 2023 Dec 1;164(12):2642-2652. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003004. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
The experience of pain associated with labour is complex and challenging to assess. A range of pain measurement tools are reported in the literature. This review aimed to identify current tools used in research to assess labour pain across the past decade and to evaluate their implementation and adequacy when used in the context of labour pain. A literature search was conducted in databases MEDLINE and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, using search terms relating to labour, pain, and measurement. A total of 363 articles were selected for inclusion. Most studies (89.9%) assessed pain as a unidimensional experience, with the most common tool being the Visual Analogue Scale, followed by the Numerical Rating Scale. Where studies assessed pain as a multidimensional experience, the most common measurement tool was the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Only 4 studies that used multidimensional tools selected a tool that was capable of capturing positive affective states. Numerous variations in the implementation of scales were noted. This included 35 variations found in the wording of the upper and lower anchors of the Visual Analogue Scale, some assessment tools not allowing an option for "no pain," and instances where only sections of validated tools were used. It is clear that development of a standardised pain assessment strategy, which evaluates the multidimensions of labour pain efficiently and effectively and allows for both positive and negative experiences of pain to be reported, is needed.
分娩相关疼痛的体验非常复杂,难以评估。文献中报道了一系列疼痛测量工具。本综述旨在确定过去十年中用于评估分娩疼痛的研究中当前使用的工具,并评估其在分娩疼痛背景下的实施情况和充分性。在 MEDLINE 和 Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature 数据库中使用与分娩、疼痛和测量相关的搜索词进行了文献检索。共选择了 363 篇文章进行纳入。大多数研究(89.9%)将疼痛评估为单维度体验,最常用的工具是视觉模拟量表,其次是数字评分量表。在评估疼痛为多维体验的研究中,最常用的测量工具是麦吉尔疼痛问卷。只有 4 项使用多维工具的研究选择了一种能够捕捉积极情感状态的工具。在量表的实施方面存在许多差异。这包括在视觉模拟量表的上下锚定词中发现的 35 种变化,一些评估工具不允许选择“无疼痛”,以及仅使用经过验证的工具部分的情况。显然,需要制定一种标准化的疼痛评估策略,该策略能够有效地评估分娩疼痛的多维维度,并允许报告疼痛的积极和消极体验。