Wang Chaochao, Fu Lihui, Liang Liang, Zhou Jinlong
Department of Radiology, Li Huili Hospital of Ningbo Medical Center Ningbo 315041, Zhejiang, P. R. China.
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Jul 15;15(7):4678-4686. eCollection 2023.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to analyze the relationship between tumors and nerves before surgery. However, the application value of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and post-processing techniques needs further elucidation.
To assess the value of DTI, DWI, and various post-processing techniques in determining the relationship between tumors and nerves.
The participants were 42 patients diagnosed with peripheral nerve-related tumors and 20 healthy controls. DTI and DWI scans were performed before surgery, and then DTI unidirectional maximum intensity projection (MIP) post-processing and DWI subtraction of unidirectionally encoded images for suppression of heavily isotropic objects (DWI) postprocessing techniques were used to observe the relationship between the mass and the target nerves. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of nerves was compared among the target neural origin group, non-target neural origin group, and healthy control group using the paired Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
The diagnostic coincidence rates of preoperative DTI and DWI findings with postoperative pathology were 88.1% and 100%, respectively. DTI images were of poor quality when compared to DWI (P < 0.05). The mean ADC value of the target neural origin group was greater than that of the non-target neural origin group and the healthy control group (P < 0.05).
Both DTI and DWI can stereoscopically display the relationship between peripheral nerves and tumors, but the latter contributes to better quality of the reconstructed images.
磁共振成像(MRI)常用于术前分析肿瘤与神经之间的关系。然而,扩散张量成像(DTI)、扩散加权成像(DWI)及后处理技术的应用价值尚需进一步阐明。
评估DTI、DWI及各种后处理技术在确定肿瘤与神经关系中的价值。
研究对象为42例诊断为周围神经相关肿瘤的患者及20名健康对照者。术前进行DTI和DWI扫描,然后采用DTI单向最大强度投影(MIP)后处理及DWI单向编码图像减法以抑制高各向同性物体(DWI)后处理技术观察肿块与靶神经之间的关系。采用配对Wilcoxon秩和检验比较靶神经起源组、非靶神经起源组及健康对照组神经的平均表观扩散系数(ADC)。
术前DTI和DWI检查结果与术后病理诊断的符合率分别为88.1%和100%。与DWI相比,DTI图像质量较差(P<0.05)。靶神经起源组的平均ADC值大于非靶神经起源组及健康对照组(P<0.05)。
DTI和DWI均可立体显示周围神经与肿瘤之间的关系,但后者有助于获得质量更好的重建图像。