• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在初次全髋关节置换术中,与后外侧入路相比,直接前入路导致肌酸激酶水平更高,C 反应蛋白水平更低:短期随访数据的倾向评分匹配分析。

In primary total hip arthroplasty, the direct anterior approach leads to higher levels of creatine kinase and lower levels of C-reactive protein compared to the posterolateral approach: a propensity score matching analysis of short-term follow-up data.

机构信息

Clinical Orthopedics, Department of Clinical and Molecular Science, School of Medicine, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto, 10/a, 60126, Ancona, AN, Italy.

Orthopedic Unit, Habilita Casa di Cura I Cedri, Via Don Guanella, 1, 28073, Fara Novarese, NO, Italy.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Aug 11;18(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04084-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-023-04084-x
PMID:37568175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10416395/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study compares the invasiveness of the direct anterior approach (DAA) and the posterolateral approach (PLA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) by assessing three widely used inflammation-related serum markers in the first ten post-operative days.

METHODS

The database of our institution was mined for primary THAs conducted by the DAA or the PLA from February 2020 to June 2022. Demographics and creatine kinase (CK), C-reactive protein (CRP), and white blood cells were compared. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) analysis (1:1 ratio) was conducted based on multiple variables.

RESULTS

PSM analysis yielded 44 pairs of DAA and PLA patients. CK was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the DAA than in the PLA group on postoperative day (POD) 2, 5 and 10. The POD2, POD5 and POD10 CK/preoperative CK ratio was 12.9, 5.0 and 0.8 in DAA and 8.8, 3.3 and 0.6 in PLA (p = 0.017, p = 0.012 and p = 0.025, respectively). The POD2, POD5 and POD10 CRP/preoperative CRP ratio was 95.1, 65.6 and 22.8 in PLA and 34.7, 23.3 and 8.9 in DAA (p < 0.001, p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

PSM analysis of early postoperative CK and CRP values demonstrated that the DAA should be considered as a less stressful approach, not as a muscle-sparing or a minimally invasive THA approach.

摘要

背景

本回顾性研究通过评估术后第 10 天的三种广泛使用的炎症相关血清标志物,比较直接前路(DAA)和后外侧入路(PLA)在全髋关节置换术(THA)中的侵袭性。

方法

从 2020 年 2 月至 2022 年 6 月,我们机构的数据库中挖掘出了通过 DAA 或 PLA 进行的初次 THA。比较了患者的人口统计学数据以及肌酸激酶(CK)、C 反应蛋白(CRP)和白细胞计数。根据多个变量进行了倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析(1:1 比例)。

结果

PSM 分析得出 44 对 DAA 和 PLA 患者。术后第 2、5 和 10 天,DAA 组 CK 显著高于 PLA 组(p<0.001)。DAA 组术后第 2、5 和 10 天的 CK/术前 CK 比值分别为 12.9、5.0 和 0.8,PLA 组分别为 8.8、3.3 和 0.6(p=0.017、p=0.012 和 p=0.025)。PLA 组术后第 2、5 和 10 天的 CRP/术前 CRP 比值分别为 95.1、65.6 和 22.8,DAA 组分别为 34.7、23.3 和 8.9(p<0.001、p=0.002 和 p<0.001)。

结论

早期术后 CK 和 CRP 值的 PSM 分析表明,DAA 应被视为一种压力较小的方法,而不是一种肌肉保留或微创的 THA 方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b76/10416395/5636c9807551/13018_2023_4084_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b76/10416395/5636c9807551/13018_2023_4084_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b76/10416395/5636c9807551/13018_2023_4084_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
In primary total hip arthroplasty, the direct anterior approach leads to higher levels of creatine kinase and lower levels of C-reactive protein compared to the posterolateral approach: a propensity score matching analysis of short-term follow-up data.在初次全髋关节置换术中,与后外侧入路相比,直接前入路导致肌酸激酶水平更高,C 反应蛋白水平更低:短期随访数据的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Aug 11;18(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04084-x.
2
The Direct Anterior Approach versus the Posterolateral Approach on the Outcome of Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Clinical Study.直接前入路与后外侧入路在全髋关节置换术后结果的比较:一项回顾性临床研究。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Oct;14(10):2563-2570. doi: 10.1111/os.13444. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
3
Posterolateral vs Direct Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty (POLADA Trial): A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Differences in Serum Markers.全髋关节置换术中外侧入路与前侧入路的比较(POLADA 试验):一项评估血清标志物差异的随机对照试验
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Dec;32(12):3652-3658.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
4
Changes in serum creatine kinase and C-reactive protein after posterior and direct anterior approaches in total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后后侧入路和直接前入路对血清肌酸激酶和 C 反应蛋白的影响。
Hip Int. 2022 Sep;32(5):591-595. doi: 10.1177/1120700020978643. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
5
[Comparison of the effects of total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach and posterolateral piriformis-sparing approach].[直接前方入路与保留梨状肌的后外侧入路全髋关节置换术效果比较]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Apr 18;49(2):214-220.
6
Patient-reported results of simultaneous direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasties performed in the same patients.患者报告的同期行直接前入路和后外侧入路全髋关节置换术的结果。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2021 Nov 13;22(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s10195-021-00611-w.
7
Direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of results on early post-operative period.直接前入路与后外侧入路在全髋关节置换术中的比较:早期术后结果的荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02218-7.
8
Total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach in the lateral position for the treatment of ankylosed hips.直接前侧入路侧卧位全髋关节置换术治疗髋关节僵直。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Aug;30(6):993-1001. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02655-w. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
9
Comparison of clinical efficacy between direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty.直接前入路与后外侧入路在初次全髋关节置换术中的临床疗效比较。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Jun;27(12):5604-5613. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202306_32799.
10
Direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review.直接前入路与后外侧入路治疗老年股骨颈骨折全髋关节置换术的疗效比较:Meta 分析与系统评价。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):1378-1392. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2193424.

引用本文的文献

1
Short Stem vs. Standard Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Perioperative Prospective Invasiveness Study with Serum Markers.初次全髋关节置换中短柄与标准柄的比较:一项使用血清标志物的围手术期前瞻性侵入性研究。
Diseases. 2025 Jul 23;13(8):233. doi: 10.3390/diseases13080233.
2
Comparison of autograft and allograft outcomes in adolescent ACL reconstruction: a propensity score analysis.青少年前交叉韧带重建中自体移植与同种异体移植结果的比较:倾向评分分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Apr 6;35(1):149. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04244-1.
3
Reduced polyethylene wear in dual mobility versus single mobility hip implants: Results from quantitative and qualitative scanning electron microscopy analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors influencing the outcomes of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.影响微创全髋关节置换术结局的因素:系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 May 18;17(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03168-4.
2
No benefits of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via Watson-Jones approach: A retrospective cohort study.微创经 Watson-Jones 入路全髋关节置换术无获益:一项回顾性队列研究。
Surgeon. 2022 Oct;20(5):e241-e247. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
3
Changes in serum creatine kinase and C-reactive protein after posterior and direct anterior approaches in total hip arthroplasty.
双动与单动髋关节植入物中聚乙烯磨损减少:定量和定性扫描电子显微镜分析结果
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Feb 26;12(1):e70177. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70177. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Mid-term outcomes of medial metal backed and all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in obese patients: a retrospective propensity-matched analysis.肥胖患者中金属内侧支撑和全聚乙烯单间室膝关节置换术的中期结果:回顾性倾向评分匹配分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Oct 14;19(1):651. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05148-2.
5
Metal-backed or all-poly tibial components: which are better for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A propensity-score-matching retrospective study at the 5-year follow-up.金属背衬或全聚乙烯胫骨组件:在 5 年随访时,哪种更适合内侧单间室膝关节置换术?倾向评分匹配回顾性研究。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 May 4;25(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00765-3.
全髋关节置换术后后侧入路和直接前入路对血清肌酸激酶和 C 反应蛋白的影响。
Hip Int. 2022 Sep;32(5):591-595. doi: 10.1177/1120700020978643. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
4
Greater trochanteric pain after primary total hip replacement, comparing the anterior and posterior approach: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial.初次全髋关节置换术后大转子区疼痛:前路与后路入路的对比——一项随机试验的二次分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Dec;107(8):102709. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
5
Patient satisfaction in different approaches for total hip arthroplasty.不同全髋关节置换术方法的患者满意度。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Nov;105(7):1277-1282. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
6
Does the direct anterior approach allow earlier recovery of walking following total hip arthroplasty? A randomized prospective trial using accelerometry.全髋关节置换术后,直接前路手术能否使患者更早恢复行走能力?一项使用加速度计的随机前瞻性试验。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 May;105(3):445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
7
Electromyographic study of hip muscles involved in total hip arthroplasty: Surprising results using the direct anterior minimally invasive approach.髋关节置换术中髋关节肌肉的肌电图研究:采用直接前侧微创入路的惊人结果。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Dec;104(8):1137-1142. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 May 16.
8
Evaluation of the Learning Curve When Transitioning From Posterolateral to Direct Anterior Hip Arthroplasty: A Consecutive Series of 1000 Cases.从后侧入路到直接前侧入路行髋关节置换术的学习曲线评估:一项连续 1000 例病例的研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Aug;33(8):2530-2534. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.086. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
9
Posterolateral vs Direct Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty (POLADA Trial): A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Differences in Serum Markers.全髋关节置换术中外侧入路与前侧入路的比较(POLADA 试验):一项评估血清标志物差异的随机对照试验
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Dec;32(12):3652-3658.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
10
No Correlation Between Serum Markers and Early Functional Outcome After Contemporary THA.当代全髋关节置换术后血清标志物与早期功能结果之间无相关性。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):452-462. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4904-2.