Hua Rong, Lam Chun Sing, Chu Natural, Yang Aimin, Chow Elaine, Cheung Yin Ting
School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 8th Floor, Lo Kwee-Seong Integrated Biomedical Sciences Building, Area 39, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Nutr Metab (Lond). 2023 Aug 11;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12986-023-00753-0.
Despite the popularity of dietary supplements, their effectiveness and safety in patients with diabetes remain controversial. Furthermore, evidence from clinical trials may not be generalizable to real-world settings. This study examined the association between dietary supplement use and mortality outcomes among patients with diabetes based on a nationally representative sample of US adults.
This study analyzed data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2018. Supplement users referred to adults with diabetes who reported the use of any dietary supplements in the last 30 days, and with a cumulative duration of ≥ 90 days. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between supplement use and all-cause mortality, and mortality from cardiovascular diseases (CVD), diabetes, and cancer. Subgroup analysis of different supplement classes (vitamins, minerals, botanicals, amino acids, fatty acids, probiotics and glucosamine) were also conducted.
We included 8,122 adults with diabetes (mean age: 59.4 years; 48.7% female), of whom 3,997 (54.0%) reported using supplements regularly. Vitamins (87.3%), minerals (75.3%) and botanicals (51.8%) were the most popular supplements. At a median follow-up of 6.9 years, 2447 all-cause deaths had occurred. Overall supplement use was not associated with risk of all-cause mortality among patients with diabetes (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.08, P = 0.56). Subgroup analyses suggested that amino acid use was associated with a lower all-cause mortality (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.96, P = 0.028), while the use of fatty acids (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.92, P = 0.018) and glucosamine (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.95, P = 0.022) supplements were significantly associated with lower CVD mortality.
Our results derived from real-world data suggested that overall supplement use was not associated with any mortality benefit in patients with diabetes. However, there is preliminary evidence that suggests a protective effect of amino acid use on all-cause mortality, and a benefit of fatty acids and glucosamine supplement use on CVD mortality. Future large-scale longitudinal studies are needed to investigate the association between dietary supplement use and other intermediate diabetes-related outcomes, such as glucose control and reducing diabetes-related complications.
尽管膳食补充剂很受欢迎,但它们在糖尿病患者中的有效性和安全性仍存在争议。此外,临床试验的证据可能不适用于现实世界的情况。本研究基于美国成年人的全国代表性样本,调查了糖尿病患者使用膳食补充剂与死亡率之间的关联。
本研究分析了1999 - 2018年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据。补充剂使用者指的是过去30天内报告使用过任何膳食补充剂且累计使用时间≥90天的糖尿病成年人。采用Cox比例风险模型来估计补充剂使用与全因死亡率、心血管疾病(CVD)、糖尿病和癌症死亡率之间关联的风险比(HRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。还对不同补充剂类别(维生素、矿物质、植物药、氨基酸、脂肪酸、益生菌和氨基葡萄糖)进行了亚组分析。
我们纳入了8122名糖尿病成年人(平均年龄:59.4岁;48.7%为女性),其中3997人(54.0%)报告经常使用补充剂。维生素(87.3%)、矿物质(75.3%)和植物药(51.8%)是最常用的补充剂。在中位随访6.9年时,发生了2447例全因死亡。总体而言,补充剂的使用与糖尿病患者的全因死亡风险无关(HR = 0.97,95% CI:0.87至1.08,P = 0.56)。亚组分析表明,使用氨基酸与较低的全因死亡率相关(HR = 0.66,95% CI:0.46至0.96,P = 0.028),而使用脂肪酸(HR = 0.62,95% CI:0.42至0.92,P = 0.018)和氨基葡萄糖(HR = 0.69,95% CI:0.51至0.95,P = 0.022)补充剂与较低的CVD死亡率显著相关。
我们基于现实世界数据得出的结果表明,总体补充剂使用与糖尿病患者的任何死亡获益无关。然而,有初步证据表明,使用氨基酸对全因死亡率有保护作用,使用脂肪酸和氨基葡萄糖补充剂对CVD死亡率有益。未来需要大规模的纵向研究来调查膳食补充剂使用与其他糖尿病相关中间结局之间的关联,如血糖控制和减少糖尿病相关并发症。