Hijazi Mido Max, Siepmann Timo, El-Battrawy Ibrahim, Schröttner Percy, Podlesek Dino, Engellandt Kay, Schackert Gabriele, Juratli Tareq A, Eyüpoglu Ilker Y, Filis Andreas
Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Medicine, and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Spine Surgery, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Medicine, and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Neurology, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 2;12(15):5078. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155078.
Various treatment modalities are available for local antibiotic therapy in spondylodiscitis (SD) and isolated spinal epidural empyema (ISEE), but there is no evidence-based recommendation. Postoperative epidural suction-irrigation drainage (ESID) is thought to reduce bacterial load, which may prevent the development of relapse, wound healing, hematogenous spread, and systemic complications. We evaluated the efficacy of postoperative ESID over 20 years on disease progression and outcome in SD and ISEE.
Detailed demographic, clinical, imaging, laboratory, and microbiological characteristics were examined in our cohorts of 208 SD and ISEE patients treated with and without ESID at a university spine center in Germany between 2002 and 2022. Between-group comparisons were performed to identify meaningful differences for the procedure.
We included data from 208 patients (142 SD, 68.3% vs. 66 ISEE, 31.7%) of whom 146 were ESID patients (87 SD, 59.6% vs. 59 ISEE, 40.4%) and 62 were NON-ESID patients (55 SD, 88.7% vs. 7 ISEE, 11.3%). ESID patients with SD showed more frequent SSI (ESID: 22, 25.3% vs. NON-ESID: 3, 5.5%, = 0.003), reoperations due to empyema persistence or instability (ESID: 37, 42.5% vs. NON-ESID: 12, 21.8%, = 0.012), and a higher relapse rate (ESID: 21, 37.5% vs. NON-ESID: 6, 16.7%, = 0.037) than NON-ESID patients with SD. The success rate in NON-ESID patients with SD was higher than in ESID patients with SD (ESID: 26, 29.9% vs. NON-ESID: 36, 65.6%, < 0.001). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that ESID therapy ( < 0.001; OR: 0.201; 95% CI: 0.089-0.451) was a significant independent risk factor for treatment failure in patients with SD.
Our retrospective cohort study with more than 20 years of experience in ESID technique shows a negative effect in patients with SD in terms of surgical site infections and relapse rate.
对于脊柱椎间盘炎(SD)和孤立性脊柱硬膜外脓肿(ISEE)的局部抗生素治疗,有多种治疗方式可供选择,但尚无基于证据的推荐意见。术后硬膜外吸引冲洗引流(ESID)被认为可降低细菌载量,这可能预防复发、伤口愈合、血行播散及全身并发症的发生。我们评估了术后ESID在20年期间对SD和ISEE疾病进展及预后的疗效。
在德国一家大学脊柱中心,对2002年至2022年期间接受或未接受ESID治疗的208例SD和ISEE患者队列进行了详细的人口统计学、临床、影像学、实验室及微生物学特征检查。进行组间比较以确定该手术的有意义差异。
我们纳入了208例患者的数据(142例SD,占68.3%;66例ISEE,占31.7%),其中146例为ESID患者(87例SD,占59.6%;59例ISEE,占40.4%),62例为非ESID患者(55例SD,占88.7%;7例ISEE,占11.3%)。SD的ESID患者手术部位感染更频繁(ESID:22例,占25.3%;非ESID:3例,占5.5%,P = 0.003),因脓肿持续或不稳定而再次手术的情况更多(ESID:37例,占42.5%;非ESID:12例,占21.8%,P = 0.012),复发率也更高(ESID:21例,占37.5%;非ESID:6例,占16.7%,P = 0.037)。SD的非ESID患者成功率高于SD的ESID患者(ESID:26例,占29.9%;非ESID:36例,占65.6%,P < 0.001)。多因素二元逻辑回归分析显示,ESID治疗(P < 0.001;OR:0.201;95%CI:0.089 - 0.451)是SD患者治疗失败的显著独立危险因素。
我们这项在ESID技术方面有20多年经验的回顾性队列研究表明,ESID对SD患者的手术部位感染和复发率有负面影响。