• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊柱手术后慢性疼痛的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Prevalence of Chronic Pain After Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Alshammari Hotoon S, Alshammari Abdullah S, Alshammari Sulaiman A, Ahamed Shaik Shaffi

机构信息

College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.

College of Medicine, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jul 13;15(7):e41841. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41841. eCollection 2023 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.41841
PMID:37575867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10423077/
Abstract

Degenerative disc disease and low back pain are common challenges that persist even after a discectomy. However, characterizations and quantifications of these illnesses from the patients' perspective are insufficient. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis to determine the frequency of chronic pain after spinal surgery. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Google Scholar, and the Saudi Digital Library to retrieve research articles describing the frequency of persistent back pain, reoccurring disc herniation, and undergoing another operation following primary lumbar discectomy. We excluded articles that did not disclose the proportion of patients who experienced ongoing back or leg pain for over six months after the operation. We included 16 studies evaluating 85,643 patients. The pooled prevalence of persistent pain was 14.97% (95% confidence interval: 12.38-17.76). With all advancements in technology and operation techniques, many patients (14.97%) still have failed back surgery syndrome. Appropriate preoperative communication and multidisciplinary and coordinated treatment strategies yielded the best results.

摘要

椎间盘退变疾病和下腰痛是常见的难题,即使在椎间盘切除术后依然存在。然而,从患者角度对这些疾病的特征描述和量化尚不充分。我们旨在对文献进行系统综述和荟萃分析,以确定脊柱手术后慢性疼痛的发生率。我们检索了MEDLINE(PubMed)、谷歌学术和沙特数字图书馆,以获取描述初次腰椎间盘切除术后持续性背痛、复发性椎间盘突出以及再次手术发生率的研究文章。我们排除了未披露术后持续背痛或腿痛超过六个月的患者比例的文章。我们纳入了16项评估85643例患者的研究。持续性疼痛的合并患病率为14.97%(95%置信区间:12.38 - 17.76)。尽管技术和手术技巧不断进步,但仍有许多患者(14.97%)出现腰椎手术失败综合征。适当的术前沟通以及多学科协作的治疗策略能取得最佳效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca2/10423077/e996584cbd23/cureus-0015-00000041841-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca2/10423077/976c09c5ab90/cureus-0015-00000041841-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca2/10423077/e996584cbd23/cureus-0015-00000041841-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca2/10423077/976c09c5ab90/cureus-0015-00000041841-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca2/10423077/e996584cbd23/cureus-0015-00000041841-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevalence of Chronic Pain After Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.脊柱手术后慢性疼痛的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 13;15(7):e41841. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41841. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Effect of Lumbar Discectomy or Lumbar Decompression on Axial Back Pain: Results of a Meta-Analysis.腰椎间盘切除术或腰椎减压术对轴性背痛的影响:一项荟萃分析的结果
World Neurosurg. 2023 Sep;177:109-121. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.06.064. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
3
Artificial discs for lumbar and cervical degenerative disc disease -update: an evidence-based analysis.用于腰椎和颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病的人工椎间盘——最新进展:基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(10):1-98. Epub 2006 Apr 1.
4
Comparative outcomes of epidural steroids versus placebo after lumbar discectomy in lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腰椎间盘突出症患者行腰椎间盘切除术后硬膜外注射类固醇与安慰剂的比较结果:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Dec;28(8):1589-1599. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2229-4. Epub 2018 May 29.
5
The effectiveness of lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain.腰椎经椎间孔硬膜外注射治疗慢性下腰痛和下肢痛的效果。
Pain Physician. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(4):E363-404.
6
Incidence of Low Back Pain After Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Disc and Its Effect on Patient-reported Outcomes.腰椎间盘突出症行腰椎间盘切除术后腰痛的发生率及其对患者报告结局的影响。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):1988-99. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4193-1.
7
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
8
Systematic review of caudal epidural injections in the management of chronic low back pain.尾端硬膜外注射治疗慢性下腰痛的系统评价
Pain Physician. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):109-35.
9
The association between changes in multifidus muscle morphology and back pain scores following discectomy surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腰椎间盘突出症椎间盘切除术后多裂肌形态变化与腰痛评分的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Jul;31(7):1784-1794. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07181-3. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
10
Is discectomy effective for treating low back pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation and Modic changes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.椎间盘切除术对伴有腰椎间盘突出症和Modic改变的患者治疗下腰痛是否有效?一项队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2023 Apr;23(4):533-549. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.10.008. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuity of care in lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis providing a deeper look into postoperative efficacy.腰椎间盘突出症的连续性护理:一项系统评价和荟萃分析,深入探讨术后疗效。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 17;12:1536391. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1536391. eCollection 2025.
2
Effectiveness of ultrasonography-guided periforaminal oxygen-ozone therapy in chronic low back pain.超声引导下椎间孔周围臭氧注射治疗慢性下腰痛的疗效
Turk J Med Sci. 2025 Apr 24;55(3):676-686. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.6015. eCollection 2025.
3
What is the role of non-surgical clinicians in the assessment and management of degenerative cervical myelopathy? - Insights from the RECODE-DCM peri-operative rehabilitation incubator.

本文引用的文献

1
: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis.一个用于生成符合PRISMA 2020标准流程图的R包和Shiny应用程序,具有交互性以实现优化的数字透明度和开放综合。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 27;18(2):e1230. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1230. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Gender Disparities in Outpatient Management of Postlaminectomy Syndrome.椎板切除术后综合征门诊管理中的性别差异
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Apr;16(2):373-377. doi: 10.14444/8225.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
非手术临床医生在退行性颈椎脊髓病的评估和管理中扮演着什么角色?——来自RECODE-DCM围手术期康复孵化器的见解。
Brain Spine. 2025 May 8;5:104275. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104275. eCollection 2025.
4
Treatment modalities for patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type II: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.II型持续性脊柱疼痛综合征患者的治疗方式:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Mar 5;5(1):63. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00778-x.
5
Prevalence of and recommendation for measuring chronic postsurgical pain in children: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童慢性术后疼痛的患病率及测量建议:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Feb 5;50(2):132-143. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105697.
6
The Utilization of Ultrasound-Guided Regional Nerve Blocks in Anesthetic Management for Fracture Surgery.超声引导下区域神经阻滞在骨折手术麻醉管理中的应用
J Pain Res. 2025 Jan 20;18:353-366. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S492151. eCollection 2025.
7
The safety and efficacy of anti-inflammatory-impregnated gelatin sponge in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗炎浸渍明胶海绵在脊柱手术中的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Asian Spine J. 2024 Dec;18(6):875-888. doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0271. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
8
A digital tool for multidimensional assessment and prediction of treatment effectiveness in chronic pain management.一种用于慢性疼痛管理中治疗效果多维评估和预测的数字工具。
iScience. 2024 Oct 18;27(12):111200. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111200. eCollection 2024 Dec 20.
9
Does rehabilitation improve work participation in patients with chronic spinal pain after spinal surgery: a systematic review.康复治疗能否提高脊柱手术后慢性脊柱疼痛患者的工作参与度:一项系统评价
J Rehabil Med. 2025 Jan 3;57:jrm25156. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v57.25156.
10
Using Key Predictors in an SVM Model for Differentiating Spinal Fractures and Herniated Intervertebral Discs in Preoperative Anesthesia Evaluation.在术前麻醉评估中使用支持向量机模型中的关键预测因子区分脊柱骨折和椎间盘突出症
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Nov 2;14(21):2456. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14212456.
《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
4
Perceived Injustice Helps Explain the Association Between Chronic Pain Stigma and Movement-Evoked Pain in Adults with Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain.感知到的不公正有助于解释非特异性慢性下腰痛成人中慢性疼痛污名与运动诱发性疼痛之间的关联。
Pain Med. 2020 Nov 1;21(11):3161-3171. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa095.
5
Damaging State Legislation Regarding Opioids: The Need To Scrutinize Sources Of Inaccurate Information Provided To Lawmakers.关于阿片类药物的有害州立法:审视向立法者提供的不准确信息来源的必要性。
J Pain Res. 2019 Nov 11;12:3049-3053. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S235366. eCollection 2019.
6
The incidence of new onset sacroiliac joint pain following lumbar fusion.腰椎融合术后新发骶髂关节疼痛的发生率。
J Spine Surg. 2019 Sep;5(3):310-314. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.09.05.
7
Invalidation of chronic pain: a thematic analysis of pain narratives.慢性疼痛的否定:疼痛叙事的主题分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Mar;43(6):861-869. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1636888. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
8
Optimizing the Management and Outcomes of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Consensus Statement on Definition and Outlines for Patient Assessment.优化腰椎手术失败综合征的管理与治疗效果:关于定义及患者评估大纲的共识声明
Pain Res Manag. 2019 Feb 18;2019:3126464. doi: 10.1155/2019/3126464. eCollection 2019.
9
Today's nonmedical opioid users are not yesterday's patients; implications of data indicating stable rates of nonmedical use and pain reliever use disorder.如今的非医疗类阿片类药物使用者已不同于往昔的患者;数据表明非医疗使用和止痛药使用障碍的发生率稳定,这具有重要意义。
J Pain Res. 2019 Feb 7;12:617-620. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S199750. eCollection 2019.
10
Socioeconomic inequalities in low back pain among older people: the JAGES cross-sectional study.老年人腰痛的社会经济不平等:JAGES 横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jan 21;18(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0918-1.